[STATUS] (flood) Wed May 19 23:46:56 EDT 2004

2004-05-20 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/01 20:55:12 $] Release: 1.0: Released July 23, 2002 milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13,

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.06

2004-05-20 Thread Geoffrey Young
blargh - cut and paste error. the subject should read Apache-Test-1.11. --Geoff

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.06

2004-05-20 Thread David Wheeler
On May 19, 2004, at 9:02 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote: a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.11 is now available. http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.11-dev.tar.gz please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing applications that use Apache-Test and report back

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.06

2004-05-20 Thread William McKee
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures. I had errors during testing which appear to be due to problems with the auto configuration. Here's the steps I used: perl Makefile.PL make

APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES problems

2004-05-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoff, why did you make APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES prevent from saving autoconfig? sub custom_config_save { my $self = shift; if ($ENV{APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES}) { debug skipping save of custom config data; return; } I mean,

Re: APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES problems

2004-05-20 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: Geoff, why did you make APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES prevent from saving autoconfig? however it's done, I want an option wereby absolutely nothing sticky is ever generated or used. the don't touch my system option was my goal, which really isn't unreasonable.

Re: Move apache-1.3 to Subversion

2004-05-20 Thread Andr Malo
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's only one thing for us to decide; how to define the layout under httpd/ in the SVN repository. e.g. .../ httpd/ trunk/ branches/ 1.3.x/ 2.0.x/ tags/ 2.0.49/ ...

Re: [STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed May 19 23:45:09 EDT 2004

2004-05-20 Thread Sander Temme
On May 19, 2004, at 8:45 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Release: 1.3.32-dev: In development 1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Jim, did you ever complete the release process? S. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529

Patch for AllowEncodedSlashes directive

2004-05-20 Thread Larry Toppi
I would like to be able to configure the AllowEncodedSlashes directive within a Location section. Currently this directive is only allowed in the server config and virtual host sections. Allowing this functionality will only need a slight modification to the core.c file by or'ing

Re: Move apache-1.3 to Subversion

2004-05-20 Thread Joseph Dane
André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...Are the different tag directories necessarry or optional? Not that every private tag gets its own... in subversion, tag == copy. this is probably the biggest conceptual difference between subversion and CVS. -- joe

looking for mpm-perchild info

2004-05-20 Thread Binam, Jesse
I apologize if this is the wrong forum. I saw in the documentation that the perchild mpm development has ceased. I have looked on apache.org for info but did not find anything. I am curious if anyone in here can tell me where else I might look for information on why it stopped, as I would like

Re: looking for mpm-perchild info

2004-05-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Binam, Jesse wrote: I apologize if this is the wrong forum. I saw in the documentation that the perchild mpm development has ceased. I have looked on apache.org for info but did not find anything. I am curious if anyone in here can tell me where else I might look for

Re: looking for mpm-perchild info

2004-05-20 Thread Eugene Lee
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:25:06PM -0600, Binam, Jesse wrote: : : I apologize if this is the wrong forum. I saw in the documentation : that the perchild mpm development has ceased. I have looked on : apache.org for info but did not find anything. I am curious if anyone : in here can tell me where

RE: looking for mpm-perchild info

2004-05-20 Thread Binam, Jesse
I saw the note. Nice choice of words they chose ;) CGI/suexec is not sufficient for me since I still cannot run as root. I know there are other options that would probably be easier, but I think the mpm would work better, plus it would be awesome for virtual hosting as well if I could get it

Re: looking for mpm-perchild info

2004-05-20 Thread Sascha Kersken
You might want to try metux MPM instead; it provides similar functionality and works all right: http://www.metux.de/mpm/ Regards Sascha - Original Message - From: Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:38 PM Subject: Re: looking for mpm-perchild

Re: looking for mpm-perchild info

2004-05-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Sascha Kersken wrote: You might want to try metux MPM instead; it provides similar functionality and works all right: http://www.metux.de/mpm/ metux... That's the name I keep forgetting. But you might note that your website is not very useful since the download link is

Re: looking for mpm-perchild info

2004-05-20 Thread Sascha Kersken
Hi, you are right, it's broken. But this is not my site ;-). Regards Sascha - Original Message - From: Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:55 PM Subject: Re: looking for mpm-perchild info On Thu, 20 May 2004, Sascha Kersken wrote:

LDAP SDK behaviour and mod_ldap

2004-05-20 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, There is a request outstanding for the ability to specify the trusted CA for TLS on a per virtualhost basis. With openldap, the TLS setting can be set per connection with the ldap_set_option() function. I don't have info for the ways that the Netscape, Netware or Microsoft SDKs work -

[Patch] IfSymbol directive (bug 29003)

2004-05-20 Thread Edward Rudd
I've posted 2 patches and listed several solutions to my bug # 29003. This bug is a feature request addressing the common issue where a module does not follow the standard naming of module source code names.. (mod_modulename.c), but instead use something else (sapi_apache2.c). The first solution