On Jun 28, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Darwin 7.4 (MacOSX 10.3.4), prefork, the test suite gives me minor
barfage which I think is more on the test side than on the httpd side:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List o
* Chip Cuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:43:11PM -0500:
>
> Indeed it did. Applied diff, and am building on arbitrary RH 7.3 and 9.0
> rpm buildhosts as I type this. Shall I send the resulting build-logs to the
> list, or just you? I usually ask permission to send attachment
* Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:45:19AM +0200:
>
> The diff is attached - give it a try, tell me if it works. You need to
> run ./buildconf to generate the httpd.spec from build/rpm/httpd.spec.in,
> then tar up the archive and run and an RPM should result.
Got
Chip Cuccio wrote:
Ahhh - thanks ;-)
Shall I take a crack at it? How can we test the resultant spec?
The diff is attached - give it a try, tell me if it works. You need to
run ./buildconf to generate the httpd.spec from build/rpm/httpd.spec.in,
then tar up the archive and run
rpmbuild --rebuild
* Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:36:33AM +0200:
>
> No, I am referring to the spec file included in httpd v2.0.50, which is
> currently broken.
Ahhh - thanks ;-)
Shall I take a crack at it? How can we test the resultant spec?
Take care
--
Chip Cuccio
Chip Cuccio wrote:
The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still
outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it.
I built RPMs with no issues for Fedora and RH 7.2 - 9.0.
Are you referring to the libpcre hack?
No, I am referring to the spec file included in httpd v2.0.50, whic
* Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:17:01AM +0200:
>
> Sander Striker wrote:
>
> >The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >
> >Please test and cast your votes for release.
>
> The trivial fix to make the
Sander Striker wrote:
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still
outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it.
Any takers?
Regards,
G
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 02:27 +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> Please test and cast your votes for release.
Good On FreeBSD 5.2.1
* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:27:06AM +0200:
>
> Please test and cast your votes for release.
Builds and works very well on;
- Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, & 9.0
- Fedora Core Linux 1, & 2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, & 3.0
- Slackware Linu
Sander Striker wrote:
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
The update to apr_strings.c after rc2 isn't correct AFAICT (apr_snprintf()
doesn't return negative). I don't see that it hurts, as the sp
Hi,
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Sander
I have recently started to look how Authentication and Authorization
in done in Apache, and have looked over Justin Erenkrantz's slides
for "Authentication in Apache HTTP Server 2.1" and have been in touch
with some of the mod_auth_kerb developers. My apologies if this
is already being addressed,
On Monday, Patrick W. thus responded:
Indeed.. Where does that construct come from?
> printf("'N' = %d <-> FALSE[\"NY\"] = %d\n", 'N', FALSE["NY"]);
I have never seend TRUE["NY"], and would have guessed cpp would change
it to 1["NY"] which doesn't mean anything to me. It appears to want to
be "N
Agreed, and interested in other thoughts as well.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Monday, June 28, 2004 11:23:57 AM
>>>
Brad Nicholes wrote:
> I was hoping to a
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > Anyone have any problem if we enhance apachectl a bit to allow
> > for -v/-V printout? Like ./apachectl version | ./apachectl fullversion ?
>
> I don't understand. "apachectl -v" and "apachectl -V" work fine.
> (apachec
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone have any problem if we enhance apachectl a bit to allow
for -v/-V printout? Like ./apachectl version | ./apachectl fullversion ?
I don't understand. "apachectl -v" and "apachectl -V" work fine.
(apachectl passess unknown parameters directly to http
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I was hoping to avoid the MMN bump mainly because that means we can't
backport the changes to the 2.0 branch. If the httpd 2.2 includes a
caching_util module then the only reason for these stabilization patches
is the 2.0 branch. Also, if there are any other modules that do d
Anyone have any problem if we enhance apachectl a bit to allow
for -v/-V printout? Like ./apachectl version | ./apachectl fullversion ?
>Modules (right now, only mod_auth_ldap) depend on util_ldap, and
>changing the header would mean a break in binary compatibility (in
>theory). I think we should probably stick with an MMN bump for this to
>be consistent, even though only the mod_auth_ldap module uses it (to
my
>knowledge).
I
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I'm not sure what you are asking. I haven't proposed any of my
recent changes for backport yet because of the changes required in
include/util_ldap.h. Since util_ldap.h can be considered a public
header, technically any changes to the structure would require an MMN
bump.
I'm not sure what you are asking. I haven't proposed any of my
recent changes for backport yet because of the changes required in
include/util_ldap.h. Since util_ldap.h can be considered a public
header, technically any changes to the structure would require an MMN
bump. But the question is s
Before one moves on to what I was
told was the real topic of this thread...
> "Kornél Pál"
> however this topic is about using
> HTTP API in Apache HTTPD.
First let's clear up some ideas. :)
Forgetting about logging for now.
> WRowe
> I thought the entire point was that it
It being the HTTP.S
Hi all,
I'm reporting this problem here, because apache.bugs seems flooded with
spam.
The way TRUE is defined in some apache headers files is incorrect :
modules/ssl/ssl_expr.h:35:#define TRUE !FALSE
apache/ap_ctx.h:70:#define TRUE !FALSE
apache/ap_hook.h:358:#define TRUE !FALSE
apache/ap_mm.
Dzięki za poniższy list
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:02:42 +0200
Jacek Prucia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First of all: you have picked up a wrong list. Next time please post to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (you might want to subscribe before posting as it is
> moderated IIRC).
>
> On 26 Jun 2004 11:49:14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check for a NULL file name before trying to delete the file
Is this in STATUS?
Regards,
Graham
--
OK, the apr_procattr_addrspace_set() interface is sufficient to solve
this problem, right? And there's no issue with back-porting that to the
APR 0.9 branch? The only issue is how to use that interface from
mod_cgi/the Netware MPM without requiring an httpd major MMN bump? So
why not just overlo
27 matches
Mail list logo
