January 6, 2005
quote
Snip
I am a member of ECMA, an
international standards body,
where I am chair of the
committee responsible for
standardizing the CLI
(Common Language Infrastructure)
and C#.
Snip
So here is my initial question
to ponder:
What is your feeling about the
standardization of the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handle GetProtocol correctly
(and consistant with ASP.NET conventions.)
A very, very good idea! :)
virtual String* GetProtocol(void)
quote
When overridden in a derived
class, returns the HTTP protocol
(HTTP or HTTPS).
/quote
.NET Framework Class Library
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method
within the 2.1/2.2 proxy from what is basically a
weighted request count to also be a weighted
traffic count (as measured by bytes transferred)
and a weighted load count (as measured by response
time).
Sure, the general
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Why is it hardcoded to be 8000? It would seem like you could easily be
unlucky and just miss the cutoff and end up with a 6000 byte heap bucket
followed by a 3000 byte transient bucket, for example, as a result of 3
3000 byte ap_rwrites. For that
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method within the
2.1/2.2 proxy from what is basically a weighted request count to also be
a weighted traffic count (as measured by bytes transferred) and a
weighted load count (as measured by
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I still think it would be worthwhile to make it configurable. Linux or
FreeBSD5 on IA64 with 16k pages, for example, might show some decent
gains by setting that to 15000. Or do a getpagesize() call on startup
to determine it dynamically.
It might
Cliff Woolley wrote:
It might be. We've considered having it be configurable before. There
are just a lot of implications in changing the value; for example, it
affects the memory footprint of the server, it affects how much data gets
read in to memory per read() call on a file bucket (which
On Jan 7, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 8:52 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Working on some load balancing methods
I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method within the
2.1/2.2 proxy from
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm currently working on code that extended the lb method
within the 2.1/2.2 proxy from what is basically a
weighted request count to also be a weighted
traffic count (as measured by bytes transferred)
and a weighted load count (as measured by response
time). The former is
