Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread Hansjoerg Pehofer
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you checked http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? It contains a small patch which was not discussed any further here. Hi, i tried your patch today. Unfortunately

Re: mod_mbox user interface

2005-07-12 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jul 11, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote: As promised : a first try at XHTML mockup. Comments about DOM structure and XHTML semantics are welcome ! http://skikda.bulix.org/~sam/ajax/jsless/ 2005 | It looks great except for all the wasted whitespace. Jul | One thing I look for

Re: mod_mbox user interface

2005-07-12 Thread Paul A Houle
Maxime Petazzoni wrote:. As promised : a first try at XHTML mockup. Comments about DOM structure and XHTML semantics are welcome ! http://skikda.bulix.org/~sam/ajax/jsless/ On firefox/win32, the box list and message lists aren't vertically aligned correctly (at least for me.) Other

Re: [PATCH] add our version to string to httpd banner

2005-07-12 Thread Joe Schaefer
Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: module/apache/command.c === --- module/apache/command.c (revision 210049) +++ module/apache/command.c (working copy) @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include apreq_util.h #include

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread r . pluem
Hansjoerg Pehofer wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you checked http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? It contains a small patch which was not discussed any further here. Hi, i tried your

Re: mod_cache caching the 301 Moved Permanently

2005-07-12 Thread Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hansjoerg Pehofer wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you checked http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? It contains a small patch which was not discussed any further here.

ErrorDocument 'OK' behavior

2005-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
The core and mod_cgi generate documents with the 'default' response code - 200 OK is set before the handler is ever invoked, or a non-200 code if they are handling an error. This isn't true of some other modules, including mod_jk. It's also not true of mod_cgi if the 'Status: 200' field is passed

Re: ErrorDocument 'OK' behavior

2005-07-12 Thread Joshua Slive
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The core and mod_cgi generate documents with the 'default' response code - 200 OK is set before the handler is ever invoked, or a non-200 code if they are handling an error. This isn't true of some other modules, including mod_jk. It's also not true of mod_cgi if the

Re: mod-cache-requestor plan

2005-07-12 Thread Parin Shah
We have been down this road. The way one might solve it is to allow mod_cache to be able to reload an object while serving the old one. Example: cache /A for 600 seconds after 500 seconds, request /A with special header (or from special client, etc) and cache does not serve from

Re: ErrorDocument 'OK' behavior

2005-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:57 PM 7/12/2005, Joshua Slive wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The core and mod_cgi generate documents with the 'default' response code - 200 OK is set before the handler is ever invoked, or a non-200 code if they are handling an error. This isn't true of some other modules, including

Re: mod_mbox user interface

2005-07-12 Thread Maxime Petazzoni
Re- Let's go :) A pre-alpha ultra-experimental version is available at my development server : http://skikda.bulix.org/archives/dev/ This version includes the XHTML mbox list output, a Javascript-less browsing interface and a stub for the AJAX browser interface. If your browser does not