On 19/08/2005, at 7:57 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:On 19/08/2005, at 2:59 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote: Ron Reisor wrote: Hello,I ran into a problem with the loader on MacOSX.MaxOSX 1.4.2python 2.4.1apache 2.0.54The loader seems to not like the "-undefined suppress" arguments in the final load.I
I am trying to add a test for the proxy balancer stuff. In extra.conf.in
I have:
IfModule mod_proxy_balancer.c
VirtualHost proxy_http_bal1
DocumentRoot @SERVERROOT@/htdocs/modules/proxy
/VirtualHost
VirtualHost proxy_http_bal2
DocumentRoot
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:10:11PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I am trying to add a test for the proxy balancer stuff.
yay! :)
In extra.conf.in I have:
IfModule mod_proxy_balancer.c
VirtualHost proxy_http_bal1
DocumentRoot @SERVERROOT@/htdocs/modules/proxy
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:24:06PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:10:11PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now I also have in proxy.conf.in:
IfModule mod_proxy_balancer.c
VirtualHost _default_:mod_proxy_balancer
Proxy balancer://foo
BalancerMember
Joe Orton wrote:
Hmm - do you really need the special vhosts if they will just behave the
same as the default server? You can use @SERVERNAME@:@PORT@ to get that
vhost name out.
Well, to be as close to the usual use, yeah, we do.
--
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:24:06PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:10:11PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now I also have in proxy.conf.in:
IfModule mod_proxy_balancer.c
VirtualHost _default_:mod_proxy_balancer
Proxy
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:28:56PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
At 03:36 AM 8/18/2005, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:43:01PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:56:48PM -0700, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote:
The spec for If-{None-}Match and If-{Un}Modified-Since is driving
me batty.
The biggest item has to do with having to know the response code
for the request without processing the request. Specifically, 14.24
Hi all
I'm thinking to a possible solution to these problems, let me know if this
makes sense. Please note I may suggest things that are already implemented
because I had no time to extensively study the module yet.
Cache module can be splitted in two parts to implement a producer-consumer
model:
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
-- Build started: Project: mod_setenvif, Configuration: Release
Win32 --
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
As long as 2.1.7 seems good, I would like to do a vote on making it a Beta.
OK. I
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to
include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
As long as 2.1.7 seems good, I would like to do a vote on making it a Beta.
I have
No, you're not unique. You'll see that 2.1 behaves somewhat different
than 2.0, when I was trying to come up with a more logical and
expected (Ha! :) ) behavior...
On Aug 18, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Brian Akins wrote:
We have servers that listen on a ports other than 80 which our load
balancers
With the if not '-undefined' in patch provided by Graham (thanks!),
everything seems to work on:
MacOSX 10.4.2
Apple provided gcc 4.0.0
python 2.4.1
apache 2.0.54
All of the tests in test/test.py pass OK!
+1
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RWR3)
University of Delaware
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch
from
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
and as expected... I'm not
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:50:24AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
I've confirmed that
In this spirit, a major new feature of httpd-2.2 will be reliably
working Caching, but the documentation on Caching is a bit tough on
users right now. I'm currently working on this;
http://people.heanet.ie/~colmmacc/manual/misc/cachingguide.html.en
Which is about half done. Comments
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:50:24AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then
Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
at ALL in httpd-test... Guess we should strip out the whole shebang
since there was never a test that it ever worked... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|]
hey guys,
I
observed that only apache 1.3 (1.3.33) sends out the extra characters as shown
below
apache2.0 does not send out those characters,
could this be due to some code in apache1.3 ?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:17:45AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
at ALL in httpd-test...
A you've blown my sarcasm inhibitor now cap'n, I can't help it...
Gee, really? Would that be why nobody seems sure whether it actually
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Brian J. France wrote:
On Aug 18, 2005, at 6:22 PM, Rian Hunter wrote:
Don't do this just yet, mod_smtpd is changing completely!
completely = structures/io. I should commit my changes very soon
so you can start working on this.
Any ETA on this? I will be
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:17:45AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
at ALL in httpd-test...
A you've blown my sarcasm inhibitor now cap'n, I can't help it...
Gee, really? Would that be why nobody seems
On 8/19/05, Kaushal Jha - ZEDO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey guys,
I observed that only apache 1.3 (1.3.33) sends out the
extra characters as shown below
apache2.0 does not send out those characters,
go read up on Transfer-Encoding: chunked; those funny little
OK, looks like the test failure that I was seeing was more caused by my
environment, so all tests pass.
So we've got:
1. flex
2. MacOS compile
3. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-72
Is this all?
Grisha
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
OK, I think
hi,
Over the past few days i've been reading around the source code and
improving the doxygen documentation. You can see the results here.
http://www.ranns.org/~ndrr/apache2/dox/html/index.html
Essentially what i have done is:
1) change all the @package (since these generate Namespaces) to
Let me prefix this with, I don't want to start another CTR vs RTC war.
I do agree that CTR does add a major overhead to backporting Items to
the 'stable' branch.
I wish to avoid this overhead in the STATUS file.
I think part of our problem is that we backport too much. We currently
backport
Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
Windows
This is what add_lbmethods does...
It adds the method, but remember, the widows don't have fork,
so probably the data from parent is not there.
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
and as expected... I'm not sure, but I would almost
bet that it was due not all required *.o's being
rebuilt, and the hook in mod_proxy not being called
when you tested.
Can others confirm one way or another?
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
Windows
This is what add_lbmethods does...
It adds the method, but remember, the widows don't have fork,
so probably the data from parent is not there.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
and as expected... I'm not sure, but I would almost
bet that it was due not all required *.o's being
rebuilt, and the hook in mod_proxy not being called
when you tested.
Can
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
OK, looks like the test failure that I was seeing was more caused by my
environment, so all tests pass.
So we've got:
1. flex
2. MacOS compile
3. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-72
Is this all?
4. From Graham:
Only other issue at the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Is it a scope issue because find_best_bytraffic is defined
as static...? Hmmm. I need to look into that.
Perhaps the problem is because on windows the config is
run twice.
Also seems that the hook is never run, or is run only once:
For example:
ProxySet
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Is it a scope issue because find_best_bytraffic is defined
as static...? Hmmm. I need to look into that.
Perhaps the problem is because on windows the config is
run twice.
It is on Unix as well.
Also seems that the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf-lbmethods-nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods hook is never called.
Proxy balancer://cluster
BalancerMember http://localhost:8080
ProxySet
Hi there,
Since I've seen nobody respond to my previous message yet, I thought I'd
ask a more concrete question:
Should the filter code do a .flush() automatically?
It seems to break things if input filters are used in the context of
mod_proxy or mod_rewrite. Perhaps it's better for the
Hi Neale,
On Aug 19, 2005, at 7:55 AM, Neale Ranns wrote:
Over the past few days i've been reading around the source code and
improving the doxygen documentation. You can see the results here.
http://www.ranns.org/~ndrr/apache2/dox/html/index.html
Very cool. Could you produce a patch using
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf-lbmethods-nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods hook is never called.
Off the top of my head I can't
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf-lbmethods-nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods hook is never called.
Off the top
On Aug 18, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Brian Akins wrote:
Hmm, it seems if useCanonicalName is off and you use Servername
like this:
ServerName www.domain.com:80
That ap_get_servername will use that port unless the client used a
port in the Host: header.
My testing seems to confirm this. Is
On 8/19/05, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think part of our problem is that we backport too much. We currently
backport security fixes, small bug fixes, big bug fixes, and even
complete subsystem rewrites.
I believe that a more scalable design, is that we should try to only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the cleanups! I just wanted to get something functional
in there.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens -
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf-lbmethods-nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
The optimisations wouldn't be removing buffering, they'd be using a
different kind of buffering :-) If MMap is not available/enabled we can
fail back to a buffered APR read.
I did some tinkering with mod_disk_cache. I encapsulated all the reads
of the headers file
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The hook gets called in post_config, but not in create_config.
Of course if you move it to the post_config the config will
not work, because the array is still uninitialized.
Think it's a hook related stuff and .dll loading.
That is seriously weird... The
Brian Akins wrote:
Some more low hanging fruit.
This moves varray into disk_cache_object_t and only writes out/reads in
the request headers if the response actually varied.
An improvement upon the earlier patch that only stores the request
headers that are involved in vary.
--
Brian
Anyone here who is familiar with squid knows that you can control the
caching behavior on a very flexible manner. See this url for examples:
http://squid.visolve.com/squid/squid30/tuning.html#refresh_pattern
I copied this in my own cache module.
Is there any interest to bring something like
On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The hook gets called in post_config, but not in create_config.
Of course if you move it to the post_config the config will
not work, because the array is still uninitialized.
Think it's a hook related stuff and .dll
For a month or two now I've been using the cross reference that was linked from
the developer documentation page. Then it went away for awhile and now its back
with some weird crippled version that can't do wild card searches for
identifiers. The source navigation is broken too. eg. If you try
Hi All,
please find initial version of mod-cache-requester at the following url.
http://utdallas.edu/~parinshah/mod-c-requester.0.2.tar.gz
As we have discussed the issue before, it is not possible (or atleast
not possible w/o some refactoring) to use make-sub-request to
re-request all
51 matches
Mail list logo
