Hello mod_python developers.
I just joined this list (at the suggestion of Graham Dumpleton) to try
and get you guys to consider adding some glue to connect python 2.2
logging to Apache's logging.
This means adding a small extra source file to the mod_python
codebase. Here's my example:
# A
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Ok, please test rc3 instead:
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc3.tar.gz
Builds and passes all tests, including the perl glue, on
- Win32 (ActivePerl 813: perl-5.8.7), mp 2.0.2 (rc2),
Apache/2.0.54 (winnt)
- linux (perl-5.8.7), mp
I plan to do some updates on the debugging page of the site in the next days.
Therefore I want to know if coreadm is still available on Solaris 10.
As I have no Solaris 10 box at hand maybe somebody here can help :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:28:37AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I plan to do some updates on the debugging page of the site in the next days.
Therefore I want to know if coreadm is still available on Solaris 10.
As I have no Solaris 10 box at hand maybe somebody here can help :-).
It is -
On 10/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Oct 18 02:24:02 2005
New Revision: 326058
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326058view=rev
Log:
C++ comments are not supported by some compilers (ReliantUnix).
or native compilers for AIX, z/OS, HP-UX,
Brian Pane wrote:
I think one contributor to the event results is an issue that Paul Querna
pointed out on #httpd-dev the other day: apr_pollset_remove runs in O(n)
time with n descriptors in the pollset.
thanks, I see it. yeah we are going to have to do something about that.
Greg
Hey @all,
today I tried build Apache 2.0.55 with OpenSSL 0.9.8a and I got
following error while executing make for the Apachecode:
[...]
Text relocation remains referenced
against symbol offset in file
DES_SPtrans
Just for your info... I've already responded on the users list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bret Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 18, 2005 1:35 PM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3.x release announcements?
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Some time ago, I subscribed to
On 10/18/2005 09:22 AM, Mads Toftum wrote:
[..cut..]
It is - http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5166/6mbb1kpvk?a=view
vh
Mads Toftum
Thanks for the link.
Regards
Rüdiger
Forgot to ask here, too, for good measure :)
Original Message
Subject: Win32 1.3.34 binary installs available
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:56:57 -0500
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: testers@httpd.apache.org
To: testers@httpd.apache.org
If anyone has a few
...a.k.a. Windows Update doesn't work through an httpd-2.* proxy. it looks like a
regression from 1.3.
the interesting stuff happens in ap_content_length_filter. it calculates the new content
length by traversing the output brigade. but in this case, the brigade consists of only
an EOS
The following patch should fix PR37145. I would like to hear some comments /
thoughts
from brigade / buckets and proxy gurus on this.
Although this problem has been reported against 2.0.55, I cross checked
and this problem is also in the trunk.
Regards
Rüdiger
Index:
On Oct 18, 2005, at 3:58 PM, Greg Ames wrote:
Index: server/protocol.c
===
--- server/protocol.c (revision 326257)
+++ server/protocol.c (working copy)
@@ -1302,7 +1302,13 @@
* We can only set a C-L in the response header
Thanks.
-
Original Message -
From: Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.55 w/ SSL
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:23:14 +0200
Paul Risenhoover wrote:
Where can I pick up a Win32 build of Apache 2.0.55 w/ SSL?
http://hunter.campbus.com/
Attached a new version of the patch that uses ap_save_brigade.
Again for 2.0.x.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/19/2005 02:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
The following patch should fix PR37145. I would like to hear some comments /
thoughts
from brigade / buckets and proxy gurus on this.
Although this
15 matches
Mail list logo
