Re: Endless loop in split_on_bdry() of library/parser_multipart.c?

2006-05-31 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: At least now it's a bit clearer why the no-strict-aliasing optimization is getting confused ;-) Hey, speak for yourself ;-) -- Bojan

Re: [PATCH] setenvif filter

2006-05-31 Thread Francois PESCE
I've discussed about a patch for mod_setenvif 2 years ago, and have coded it at that time, it is successfully used on various host in production since. Some example of usage in production: ### Size Filters # don't compress items with size lower than 1000 bytes (0-999) SetEnvIf output_header

Re: [PATCH] setenvif filter

2006-05-31 Thread Brian Akins
Francois PESCE wrote: I've discussed about a patch for mod_setenvif 2 years ago, and have coded it at that time, it is successfully used on various host in production since. You need to handle content type specially by checking r-content_type. For some reason, just doing

Re: conclusions to FAQs on mod_proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk?

2006-05-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 28, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: 3. Currently connections are not checked if they are healthy *before* a request is send (something like mod_jk's connect_timeout, prepost_timeout). I think this would be nice to have, but I guess it is not easy to do this in a

Re: conclusions to FAQs on mod_proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk?

2006-05-31 Thread Graham Leggett
On Wed, May 31, 2006 3:47 pm, Jim Jagielski wrote: Of course, there is a growing school of thought that questions whether the whole AJP stuff itself is worthwhile... just proxy HTTP and be done with it. :) This was a question raised way back when before the ajp work started, the question was

Re: conclusions to FAQs on mod_proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk?

2006-05-31 Thread Mladen Turk
Jim Jagielski wrote: I guess it depend on what we mean by healthy... We could ping the socket and make sure there's a response at the network stack layer, which would be protocol agnostic. Or, each proxy module would need to implement some protocol specific ping/pong test. Right, the

Re: conclusions to FAQs on mod_proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk?

2006-05-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 31, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2006 3:47 pm, Jim Jagielski wrote: Of course, there is a growing school of thought that questions whether the whole AJP stuff itself is worthwhile... just proxy HTTP and be done with it. :) This was a question raised way

Re: conclusions to FAQs on mod_proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk?

2006-05-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: I guess it depend on what we mean by healthy... We could ping the socket and make sure there's a response at the network stack layer, which would be protocol agnostic. Or, each proxy module would need to implement some

Re: [PATCH] setenvif filter

2006-05-31 Thread Francois Pesce
These patches may fix the r-content_type behaviour. Are you OK with it ? -- *Francois Pesce* 2006/5/31, Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Francois PESCE wrote: I've discussed about a patch for mod_setenvif 2 years ago, and have coded it at that time, it is successfully used on various host in

[PATCH] mod_speling

2006-05-31 Thread olivier Thereaux
Hello, This is a followup to a (very) old thread about mod_speling on the httpd-dev list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/23.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 03, 2000, Hugo Haas wrote: On Fri, Mar 03, 2000, Martin Kraemer wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at

perl glue usage style question

2006-05-31 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
this is a style question for using the perl glue, purely stylistic - just wondering what the accepted standard is in terms of accessing a param within a single cgi script ie: access the param via $libapreq every time, or pull 1x, then use repeatedly this is a halfassed illustration below

httpd-win.conf broken on trunk

2006-05-31 Thread Garrett Rooney
It looks like the trunk version of httpd has been busted on win32 ever since the big authz refactoring in r368027. I'd be happy to make the changes to get it working again, if someone would be so kind as to point me to some sort of documentation on how exactly one goes from The old way to The

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed May 31 23:49:46 2006

2006-05-31 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-05-01 08:57:25 -0400 (Mon, 01 May 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed May 31 23:51:11 2006

2006-05-31 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-05-31 15:34:37 -0400 (Wed, 31 May 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Documentation status is maintained

Re: httpd-win.conf broken on trunk

2006-05-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Garrett Rooney wrote: It looks like the trunk version of httpd has been busted on win32 ever since the big authz refactoring in r368027. I'd be happy to make the changes to get it working again, if someone would be so kind as to point me to some sort of documentation on how exactly one goes