Re: [PATCH] Compilation on Solaris

2006-06-16 Thread Shanti Subramanyam
Here is the patch : --- README.platformsFri Jun 16 09:12:33 2006 +++ README.platforms.orig Thu Jun 15 13:13:50 2006 @@ -95,12 +95,4 @@ http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.49/aix_xlc_optimization.patch (That patch works with many recent levels of Apache 2+.)

libapreq 1.3 and Segmentation fault after upload

2006-06-16 Thread Sven Geisler
Hi, I'm using perl 5.8.8, apache 1.3.34, mod_perl 1.29 and libapreq 1.3. I'm getting sometimes Segmentation faults after an upload. I can force the segmentation faults when I use larger file name. I use Apache::Upload object to access the files. I tried with gdb to backtrace the cause, but I

Re: [PATCH] Compilation on Solaris

2006-06-16 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 6/16/06, Shanti Subramanyam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the patch : --- README.platformsFri Jun 16 09:12:33 2006 +++ README.platforms.orig Thu Jun 15 13:13:50 2006 @@ -95,12 +95,4 @@ http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.49/aix_xlc_optimization.patch

Re: debug apache

2006-06-16 Thread Alexander Lazic
Any opinion from the developer, to this issue?! On Don 01.06.2006 08:14, Alexander Lazic wrote: Hi, i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked me follwing: Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the flow of a request? eg: $REQUEST accepted on

Re: [PATCH] Compilation on Solaris

2006-06-16 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:56:55AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Actually, if I read the license, I'm not sure this is a great idea to recommend now: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/sssent/ Specifically, it says: --- Permitted Use: Provided that You are

Re: [PATCH] Compilation on Solaris

2006-06-16 Thread Ian Holsman
huh? why is the licensing terms stopping us recommending something? we recommend VC2005 for windows and that it commercial, I don't see the difference. (and yes.. I saw mads's comment that this studio is free if your register) On 17/06/2006, at 4:56 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On

Re: [PATCH] Compilation on Solaris

2006-06-16 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 6/16/06, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: huh? why is the licensing terms stopping us recommending something? we recommend VC2005 for windows and that it commercial, I don't see the difference. (and yes.. I saw mads's comment that this studio is free if your register) Recommending

Re: [PATCH] Compilation on Solaris

2006-06-16 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 6/16/06, Mads Toftum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I think that page needs updating. AFAIK sun studio has been free since version 11. In particular: http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/downloads/index.jsp yeah, it does mention FREE for SDN members - but that's just another way of asking

Re: [PATCH] Compilation on Solaris

2006-06-16 Thread Shanti Subramanyam
Thanks Mads. I've re-generated the PATCH with the Studio URL : --- README.platformsFri Jun 16 13:58:10 2006 +++ README.platforms.orig Thu Jun 15 13:13:50 2006 @@ -95,12 +95,4 @@ http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.0.49/aix_xlc_optimization.patch (That patch