Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF EITO
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 00:55 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: hot standby in proxy added My thoughts are how to make this better; overloading the concept of disabled workers to mean multiple things depending on

Environment Variable Interpolation in ProxyPass/Reverse

2006-07-12 Thread Nick Kew
This is a topic that's been discussed occasionally, though not (AFAIR) on this list. A few weeks back, I implemented a patch to support interpolating per-request environment variables in reverse proxying directives. Note that this goes beyond what mod_rewrite already supports, because it also

Re: Environment Variable Interpolation in ProxyPass/Reverse

2006-07-12 Thread Eli Marmor
I'm not a member, and I can't vote but only express my own needs, but this is something that I've waited for a long time, and I even planned to implement it, but Nick was faster... Nick Kew wrote: This is a topic that's been discussed occasionally, though not (AFAIR) on this list. A few

ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Hi, Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - Shouldn't it give the exact match - Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Rainer Jung wrote: Jim Jagielski schrieb: Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 07/11/2006 10:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The hot-standby worker is the last resort if the site would be otherwise dead. The hot-standby worker can be used e.g. to display a maintenance page or a simpler

AW: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF EITO
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jean-frederic Clere Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 14:21 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: ap_proxy_get_worker Hi, Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - Shouldn't it give the exact match - Normally you do not

Re: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - Shouldn't it give the exact match - No, because most of the times the URL isn't an exact match, but rather the longest match... --

Re: AW: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Plüm wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jean-frederic Clere Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 14:21 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: ap_proxy_get_worker Hi, Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - Shouldn't it give the exact match - Normally

APR-UTIL build breakage

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Since this morning, apr-util (trunk) is refusing to build: Making all in apr-util make[3]: *** No rule to make target `.make.dirs', needed by `buckets/apr_brigade.lo'. Stop. make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all-recursive]

Re: AW: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF EITO
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jean-frederic Clere Ok. What happends in a configuration like: +++ ProxyPass /foo http://foo.example.com/bar ProxyPass /bar http://foo.example.com/bar/foo +++ Only one worker will be created. Yes this is true. The question is: Is this

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Rainer Jung
Jim Jagielski schrieb: Yes, and that's why it's confusing. I can also see cases where you would want a hot-standby available at the same distance as well (check to see if there's a hot standby first, before checking hosts at a greater distance). You are totally right, I missed that one.

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Rainer Jung wrote: I'm not totally happy with mod_jk, because it grew over a long time, whenever a special new use case appeared, but it lacks consistency of configurations options and how they interact. :) That's the nice thing about the proxy module is that we're able to start from

Re: APR-UTIL build breakage

2006-07-12 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 7/12/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since this morning, apr-util (trunk) is refusing to build: Making all in apr-util make[3]: *** No rule to make target `.make.dirs', needed by `buckets/apr_brigade.lo'. Stop. make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: ***

RE: IPV6 enabled on supplied Windows 32 binary?

2006-07-12 Thread Warren Lewis
Testing in a IPV6 environment fails. :-( Also shouldn't I see -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled) or -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses disable) in the log if IPV6 is enabled? I attempted to build the executable myself with Visual Studio 2005, but, I can't get a

Re: IPV6 enabled on supplied Windows 32 binary?

2006-07-12 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Indeed i can't get mine to bind on IPv6 aswel... strange since i was sure i had it listening on IPv6!I get a [Wed Jul 12 20:10:16 2006] [crit] (OS 11004)The requested name is valid, but no data of the requeste d type was found. : alloc_listener: failed to set up sockaddr for

Re: memory leaks (was Re: Commented: (MODPYTHON-172) Memory leak with util.fieldstorage using mod_python 3.2.8 on apache 2.0.55)

2006-07-12 Thread Harold Ship
Jim Gallacher jpg at jgassociates.ca writes: I've run some tests to evaluate the memory leaks. The tests are brute force - make requests and watch the memory changes with top -b. ... First up - our leaky 3.2.9, and man does it leak! The readlines request has a body of 1M bytes, and it

2.0.x

2006-07-12 Thread Marcin Zawadzki/GlobalVanet.com
In version 2.0.x (latest), is very important bug security. When option followsymlinks and symlinksifownermatrch are disabled, there is another way to use symlinks on linux. There is: I created directory in document root (documentroot=/home/apachedata/htdocs): mkdir directory1 then i create a

Re: IPV6 enabled on supplied Windows 32 binary?

2006-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
You need to adjust srclib/apr/include/apr.hw appropriately to enable IPV6. Once enabled, apr/httpd would fail to load on a non-IPV6 box. Bill Jorge Schrauwen wrote: I'm pretty sure i compiled mine with IP V6 and it doesn't show for me aswel. SO just test it and see if it works On 7/10/06,

Re: [VOTE] Release mod_aspdotnet build 2004?

2006-07-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ping to the committee and interested users; vote began early on 7/7 and will close early on 7/17. Three +1's of the PMC are required to release this software, with more +'s than -'s. Other voters are welcome to chime in with advisory votes to help the PMC. On 7/17 the software will be

Re: IPV6 enabled on supplied Windows 32 binary?

2006-07-12 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:12:41PM +0200, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Indeed i can't get mine to bind on IPv6 aswel... strange since i was sure i had it listening on IPv6! I get a [Wed Jul 12 20:10:16 2006] [crit] (OS 11004)The requested name is valid, but no data of the requeste d type was

Re: IPV6 enabled on supplied Windows 32 binary?

2006-07-12 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On 7/12/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You need to adjust srclib/apr/include/apr.hw appropriately to enable IPV6.Once enabled, apr/httpd would fail to load on a non-IPV6 box.BillWait... so if i uncommned that IPv6 should work but IPv4 would be broke? Or both will work but the

Re: memory leaks (was Re: Commented: (MODPYTHON-172) Memory leak with util.fieldstorage using mod_python 3.2.8 on apache 2.0.55)

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Gallacher
Harold Ship wrote: Jim Gallacher jpg at jgassociates.ca writes: I've run some tests to evaluate the memory leaks. The tests are brute force - make requests and watch the memory changes with top -b. ... First up - our leaky 3.2.9, and man does it leak! The readlines request has a body

Additing a storage for the shared information of the worker in mod_proxy

2006-07-12 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Hi, I am still trying to replace the scoreboard by shared memory to store the shared information of the workers, I am now thinking to get this by adding modules like the prototype I have enclosed (that is a patch against trunk). Does this look to be the right way to go? Or has someone a

Re: Additing a storage for the shared information of the worker in mod_proxy

2006-07-12 Thread Brian Akins
Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, I am still trying to replace the scoreboard by shared memory to store the shared information of the workers, I am now thinking to get this by adding modules like the prototype I have enclosed (that is a patch against trunk). We really need a generic scoreboard

Re: 2.0.x

2006-07-12 Thread Nick Kew
I had in mind to fix this tonight. But it's too complex to get right late at night after a long day and a couple of glasses of wine. A look at it suggests we have a bug in ap_directory_walk affecting all versions. The cached dir walk optimisation at lines 555-583 (Trunk) is losing the symlink

Re: Additing a storage for the shared information of the worker in mod_proxy

2006-07-12 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Brian Akins wrote: Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, I am still trying to replace the scoreboard by shared memory to store the shared information of the workers, I am now thinking to get this by adding modules like the prototype I have enclosed (that is a patch against trunk). We really need