[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-104?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton resolved MODPYTHON-104.
Resolution: Fixed
New chapter added in documentation, so all done.
Allow Python code callouts with mod_include (SSI).
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-93?page=comments#action_12445123
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-93:
---
I have committed some changes into repository now which
fixes the issue with add_field() but also does
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-127?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton resolved MODPYTHON-127.
Resolution: Fixed
For now I have just made the tests use the new option names. There is obviously
a risk that I stuffed up the backward
On 10/27/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim sent this to me when the python-dev list was down for maintenance.
Can anyone with Python 2.5 who knows something about function internals
enlighten us about what may have changed here. Previously the names
of nested functions appeared
Graham Dumpleton (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-127?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton resolved MODPYTHON-127.
Resolution: Fixed
For now I have just made the tests use the new option names. There is obviously
a risk
On 27/10/2006, at 9:31 PM, Dan Eloff wrote:
On 10/27/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim sent this to me when the python-dev list was down for
maintenance.
Can anyone with Python 2.5 who knows something about function
internals
enlighten us about what may have changed here.
On 10/27/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless they have really screwed things around, co_varnames is
specifically
for function argument names and is unlikely to contained nested constant
names. If it did, then I would expect a lot of the publisher code to
break in
other ways as
I know we have talked a bit before about providing a means of allowing people
to return custom error pages and I haven't forgotten that. The cleanup of the
code and working out what the report error function should take in the way of
arguments is a first step to seeing how the ability to override
Have a play with code in subversion now. I have checked in some code
which dumps out information about the per request modules cache when
a 500 error is occurring and details being returned to the browser.
This has been useful as it has helped me to work out a way of
duplicating
a problem I
Hi all,
I have in my code what used to work on 1.0. I have this variable, $form,
which is a reference for $req-param. I had cases in the code where
something is submitted in a form that is incorrect, and I want to change
the op of the form by setting $form-{op} (the code has a hash reference
On Oct 27, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
You can not, they are readonly versions of APR::Table (apr_table_t)
You could always copy the structure to a hash somewhere. Also,
check the archvies of this
list, I know someone (probably joes) posted an answer to this
question
On Mon, October 23, 2006 10:50 pm, Davi Arnaut wrote:
AFAIK all major platforms provide one, even win32. I even made a
incomplete APR abstraction for file notification:
http://haxent.com/~davi/apr/notify
Is it possible to add doxygen comments on the apr_notify.h file, so as to
confirm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Fri Oct 27 06:28:56 2006
New Revision: 468373
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468373
Log:
mod_cache: Pass the output filter stack through the store_body()
hook, giving each cache backend the ability to make a better
decision as
Graham Leggett wrote:
On Mon, October 23, 2006 10:50 pm, Davi Arnaut wrote:
AFAIK all major platforms provide one, even win32. I even made a
incomplete APR abstraction for file notification:
http://haxent.com/~davi/apr/notify
Is it possible to add doxygen comments on the apr_notify.h
On Fri, October 27, 2006 4:38 pm, Davi Arnaut wrote:
Where is pdconf ? Check out all those APR_HAS_SENDFILE.
Aaargh... will fix.
Those if( and if ( are going on my nerves! :)
Damn, missed some.
Swapping the metadata check would make the code much more readable:
if (is_metadata)
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:38:02AM -0300, Davi Arnaut wrote:
+/* Is our network connection still alive?
+ * If not, we must continue caching the file, so keep
looping.
+ * We will return the error at the end when caching is
done.
+
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Fri, October 27, 2006 4:38 pm, Davi Arnaut wrote:
Where is pdconf ? Check out all those APR_HAS_SENDFILE.
Aaargh... will fix.
The purpose of that code was originally to make EnableSendfile Off
in the config file work. APR_HAS_SENDFILE only
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:05 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The purpose of that code was originally to make EnableSendfile Off
in the config file work. APR_HAS_SENDFILE only tells you that APR has
sendfile.
It still does that as far as I can see:
#if APR_HAS_SENDFILE
core_dir_config
Graham Leggett wrote:
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:05 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The purpose of that code was originally to make EnableSendfile Off
in the config file work. APR_HAS_SENDFILE only tells you that APR has
sendfile.
It still does that as far as I can see:
#if APR_HAS_SENDFILE
When I use:
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /jsp-examples/(.*).jsp(.*)
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ajp://localhost:8010/$1 [P]
and pound on Tomcat 5.5.20's /jsp-examples/jsp2/el/basic-arithmetic.jsp
through Apache (with only a single thread doing the pounding), I start
to get 503's after a while. The
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:00 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
Err. We had the data in memory, we are going to read it back from disk
again just in order to not block ? That's nonsense.
Agreed.
Please explain.
This is a disk cache. Why would you write expensive bucket data to cache,
and then expensive
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:14 pm, Paul Querna wrote:
Honestly, I am -1 on any module needing knowledge of the core module
setting. We should be making the abstraction better, not pulling things
from the core config.
This is true, but right now we don't have this level of abstraction, and
I'm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
I managed to solve this problem last night.
snip
This is what this code needed: Someone with a clue on the apache
internals so stuff can be solved properly. I have said it before and
say it again: I'm not that guy, but I know what functionality is
I think we have had enough -1s passed over the last couple days related
to mod_cache, that it indicates there is not a consensus on what should
be done, nor on how it should be done.
I think we need to stop committing code for a couple days, and try to
make a rudimentary plan for the intended
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
Err. We had the data in memory, we are going to read it back from disk
again just in order to not block ? That's nonsense.
Agreed.
Please explain.
This is a disk cache. Why would you write expensive bucket data to cache,
and then expensive bucket
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:25 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I would have been most happy if this had been fixed ages ago so I
hadn't been forced to spend lots and lots of hours kludging stuff
togehter. At least, my kludges seem to have sparked some development
in this area, so they have served
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:36 pm, Paul Querna wrote:
I think we have had enough -1s passed over the last couple days related
to mod_cache, that it indicates there is not a consensus on what should
be done, nor on how it should be done.
I think we need to stop committing code for a couple
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Tue, October 24, 2006 2:48 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
Perhaps this could be as simple as using ServerName and ServerAlias
(unless the name of the site is part of the URL, which will happen in
the
forward proxy case) to reduce the cached URL to a
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
Err. We had the data in memory, we are going to read it back from disk
again just in order to not block ? That's nonsense.
Agreed.
Please explain.
This is a disk cache. Why would you write expensive bucket data to cache,
Graham Leggett wrote:
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:25 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I would have been most happy if this had been fixed ages ago so I
hadn't been forced to spend lots and lots of hours kludging stuff
togehter. At least, my kludges seem to have sparked some development
in this
Paul Querna wrote:
I think we have had enough -1s passed over the last couple days related
to mod_cache, that it indicates there is not a consensus on what should
be done, nor on how it should be done.
I think we need to stop committing code for a couple days, and try to
make a
At 01:41 PM 10/27/2006, Davi Arnaut wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
And when you have a file backend, you want to hit your disk cache
and
not the backend when delivering data to a client. People might
think
that this doesn't matter, but for large files, especially larger
than
RAM in your
Greg Marr wrote:
At 01:41 PM 10/27/2006, Davi Arnaut wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
And when you have a file backend, you want to hit your disk cache
and
not the backend when delivering data to a client. People might
think
that this doesn't matter, but for large files, especially larger
Davi Arnaut wrote:
Greg Marr wrote:
At 01:41 PM 10/27/2006, Davi Arnaut wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
And when you have a file backend, you want to hit your disk cache
and
not the backend when delivering data to a client. People might
think
that this doesn't matter, but for large
Graham Leggett wrote:
I see lots of comments on the code, but the comments are summarised as
the cache is fine as it is. It isn't. If it was fine, key users of
network caching wouldn't be standing up saying they're using something
else.
I concur, but the history becomes a nightmare. Let's
Davi Arnaut wrote:
But that's a corner case. There is no reason in doing this for small
files (common case). For example, in a enterprise grade server memory is
cheap and permanent storage is slow and expensive.
If permanent storage is slow and expensive, what on earth is the admin
doing
Davi Arnaut wrote:
Because the data is already in memory. Why should I write something to
disk, erase it from memory, and read it again shortly ? Why should I
take care of something that is the job of the OS ? Why should I trash
the VM constantly ?
Because reading slowly from a cache disk is
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
Different VHosts meaning different URLs/directories, pointing to the
same files...
Hmm... Two thoughts come into my head over this one.
One way to approach this is to treat this as a general problem of how do
we stop people who download the same file from multiple
On Fri, 2006-27-10 at 23:33 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Different VHosts meaning different URLs/directories, pointing to
the
same files...
Hmm... Two thoughts come into my head over this one.
One way to approach this is to treat this as a general problem of how
do
we stop people
Thanks, confirms my thinking when I was trying to sleep. That is,
that the
only way they could do it if using co_varnames was to rely on
co_argcount
to denote which are the function arguments and which aren't.
Strange, wander why they made this change?
Anyway, will log a JIRA issue and see
On 27/10/2006, at 11:08 PM, Dan Eloff wrote:
I know we have talked a bit before about providing a means of
allowing people
to return custom error pages and I haven't forgotten that. The
cleanup of the
code and working out what the report error function should take in
the way of
arguments
fre 2006-10-27 klockan 23:33 +0200 skrev Graham Leggett:
A second approach could involve the use of the Etags associated with
file responses, which in the case of files served off disk (as I
understand it) are generated based on inode number and various other
uniquely file specific
lör 2006-10-28 klockan 00:21 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
fre 2006-10-27 klockan 23:33 +0200 skrev Graham Leggett:
A second approach could involve the use of the Etags associated with
file responses, which in the case of files served off disk (as I
understand it) are generated based on
43 matches
Mail list logo
