mod_cgid and accept() loop

2007-03-17 Thread Amol Dev
After running the Apache-2.0.58 server on mod_cgid on HPUX B.11.23 PA for 3-4 days all of sudden I see the following errors in error_log. "[Fri Mar 16 07:23:53 2007] [error] (231)Software caused connection abort: Error accepting on cgid socket" There were 18 millons such entries in 30 minutes

Re: internal dummy connection again

2007-03-17 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2007-03-17 11:19 PDT, William A Jr Rowe writes: William> Karl - you can pretty easily toggle requests with William> mod_log_custom and either mod_setenvif or mod_rewrite William> to not appear in the log, I'll leave that as an William> exercise to the reader (or efficient

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

2007-03-17 Thread Niklas Edmundsson
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 03/16/2007 11:55 PM, Joe Orton wrote: http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html How does this look? Anything missed out, anything that doesn't make sense? I think this covers most of the major problems in output filters which keep comi

Re: internal dummy connection again

2007-03-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Karl Chen wrote: > > What about the NOOP idea? If the connection could be reliably > detected to be coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], would there still be > a risk of an attack going unnoticed? > > It seems reasonable to elide those messages by default, or at > least write them to a different log f

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

2007-03-17 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 03/16/2007 11:55 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html > > How does this look? Anything missed out, anything that doesn't make > sense? I think this covers most of the major problems in output filters > which keep coming up. Thanks for doing this. It

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

2007-03-17 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:55:21 + Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html > > How does this look? Anything missed out, anything that doesn't make > sense? I think this covers most of the major problems in output > filters which keep coming u

Re: internal dummy connection again

2007-03-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 3/16/07, Karl Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-03-05 13:24 PST, Joe Orton writes: Joe> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:33:56PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> On 03/03/2007 05:47 AM, Karl Chen wrote: present. Also >> other issues like noise in the log file. I've also see

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

2007-03-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 3/16/07, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html I guess I'm confused about the up/down direction convention for output filters? I thought passing the next output filter is "down" and returning to the prior input filter is "up"? a few exam

Re: internal dummy connection again

2007-03-17 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2007-03-05 13:24 PST, Joe Orton writes: Joe> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:33:56PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> On 03/03/2007 05:47 AM, Karl Chen wrote: present. Also >> other issues like noise in the log file. I've also seen >> people complaining that "GET /" might incu

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

2007-03-17 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 03/16/2007 11:55 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html > > How does this look? Anything missed out, anything that doesn't make > sense? I think this covers most of the major problems in output filters > which keep coming up. Thanks for doing this. It