On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Fred Moyer wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Please give the tarball at
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC3.tar.gz
a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All tests OK on Fedora Core 5, perl 5.8.8, apache 1.3.37,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David McCreedy
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 04:29
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r543511 -
/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/src/main/http_main.c
June 04, 2007 5:51 PM David McCreedy wrote:
On 06/01/2007 05:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 4, 2007, at 10:29 PM, David McCreedy wrote:
June 04, 2007 5:51 PM David McCreedy wrote:
On 06/01/2007 05:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I squashed those. Could you check out
trunk and try another test? Thanks!
It fixes the Bad pid error but I'm not sure all is well...
On
On June 05, 2007 1:45 AM Rüdiger wrote
On June 04, 2007 5:51 PM David McCreedy wrote:
I've figured out why some pids aren't being unset and I think it could
affect other platforms besides TPF.
They're hitting the else part of the if (child_slot = 0) statement in
http_main.c's
Peter Somogyi wrote:
Sorry, could you point there please? (I've already spent 4 hours for google
and grep on trunk, asked expert people here but couldn't find anything.)
Do you mean the hole is in the auth way (we can use mod_auth_pam instead), or
in using fs ACLs instead of .htaccess?
Hi,
I need to clarify some of my doubts,
How can I build Apache 2.0.5x source on Linux (64-bit) machine?
Do I need to have a specific installer or I can use
httpd-2.0.59.tar.gz only?
On what all 64-bit platforms, Apache 2.0 or Apache 2.2 is supported?
Please reply.
