Cookie expiration date format

2007-06-06 Thread César Leonardo Blum Silveira
Hello all, I want to set the expiration date on a cookie sent by my module. Is there any APR/Apache API function which returns a date in the format specified for cookies? Also, in order to set the expiration date on a cookie, the only thing that is needed is to add expires=[date] to my cookie,

Surviving restarts

2007-06-06 Thread César Leonardo Blum Silveira
I know this is kind of a generic question, but what could make my module fail (segfault or something of the like) on a restart? Thanks, -- César L. B. Silveira http://cesarbs.wordpress.com/

Re: Surviving restarts

2007-06-06 Thread Jeremy Sowden
David Wortham wrote: Cesar, I have used gdb with Apache frequently, but I don't remember ever being able to restart Apache within gdb so trust the other guys for that advice. Here is the official Apache debugging page: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html It should walk you

Re: Sharing an object between successive requests.

2007-06-06 Thread Dumindu Pallewela
César Leonardo Blum Silveira wrote: Depending on what you want to do, DBM may fit your needs: http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/0.9/group__APR__Util__DBM.html Hi Tim, Leonardo, Thanks for the suggestions. I managed to get persistent storage working for my module with SDBM. It seems to

Re: nothing in the r-headers_out?

2007-06-06 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 07/06/07, Zeus Capricorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for your reply. But when i use telnet to get the page, httpd server does response some response headers(e-tag,etc.),and these headers are not in the page source. Does httpd server append the response headers after the handler

Re: Apache 2.0.5x on Linux 64-bit

2007-06-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
In general you should use Apache 2.2 instead of Apache 2.0 if possible, especially if you are building for 64 bit. As far as I remember Apache 2.0 has some problems with 64 bit (I do not remember the details now). Apache 2.2 works smoothly with 64 bit, but on Linux you might be hit by an apr-util

[PATCH]: prefork Bug# 17792 MaxClients invalid prior to ServerLimit

2007-06-06 Thread Dmytro Fedonin - Sun Microsystems
The directives: MaxClients 512 ServerLimit512 in that order results in WARNING: MaxClients of 512 exceeds ServerLimit value of 256 servers, lowering MaxClients to 256. To increase, please see the ServerLimit directive. Reversing the directives fixes the problem. I

pid_table (Was: Re: svn commit: r543511 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/src/main/http_main.c)

2007-06-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
It looks the the 1.3 pid_table impl is pretty much on target. I've been testing the trunk (2.3.x) version with no issues that I've been able to see, but was wondering how many others are testing... In the meantime, should I create a 2.2 branch for the 2.2-version of the pid_table code and

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Jun 6 23:49:59 2007

2007-06-06 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-05-08 19:18:57 -0400 (Tue, 08 May 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-2.2) Wed Jun 6 23:51:09 2007

2007-06-06 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-06-01 13:31:49 -0400 (Fri, 01 Jun 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-trunk) Wed Jun 6 23:56:01 2007

2007-06-06 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Documentation status is maintained