I put the docs guys on CC as there might be (hopefully :-)) someone over there
who is interested in cleaning up the documentation mess regarding this.
On 06/16/2007 02:17 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Ah, that would make sense -- but that's not what the docs say as you
point out :-)
--
Jess Holle
Status Update:
The pid-table code is:
o Applied to 1.3 branch
o In httpd-2.0-pid-table branch (branches/2.0.x fork)
o In httpd-2.2-pid-table branch (branches/2.2.x fork)
o In httpd-pid-table branch (trunk fork)
Passes httpd-tests, as well as 'ab' with *very* small
On 05/21/2007 02:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The logic should be:
1. If a per-worker value is set, use that.
2. If not, then if a ProxyTimeout value is set, use that.
3. Otherwise, use Timeout
+1 on fixing that :)
Digging somewhat deeper to actually do this I found the
On 06/16/2007 05:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Status Update:
The pid-table code is:
o Applied to 1.3 branch
o In httpd-2.0-pid-table branch (branches/2.0.x fork)
o In httpd-2.2-pid-table branch (branches/2.2.x fork)
o In httpd-pid-table branch (trunk fork)
Passes
