Darryl L. Miles wrote:
The hung apache runtime always occur after the leader apache process has
been given its signal to terminate. So talking in terms of what web
pages it serves makes no sense, since it has already shutdown all
further webpage processing. The fatal bug is that the apache
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2007 23:20
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r559837 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_filter.c
Agreed. I'm happy with the changes you imply in this and your
other post.
On the
zOS needs to compile with extra CFLAGS in order to link correctly.
After revisions 153273/153266 to ./Makefile.in there is no ability to add
any flags as buildmark.c is made without them directly using compile, i.e:
PROGRAM_PRELINK = $(COMPILE) $(top_srcdir)/server/buildmark.c
This patch will
:
httpd 2.2.4 - mod_disk_cache jumbo patch - lfs/diskformat/read-while-caching
etc.
A snapshot from 20070727 of our mod_disk_cache jumbo patch and some
assorted additional patches that's needed for stability. We've been
running this for a couple of months on ftp.acc.umu.se, they have
survived
Hi!
Attached is a version of mod_limitipconn.c that works in conjunction
with mod_cache and httpd-2.2. We've been using this on ftp.acc.umu.se
for some time now without any unwanted issues.
The main problem with mod_limitipconn-0.22 was that since mod_cache
runs as a quick handler,
-1.
Please revert. You did not have enough votes for backport. You need to have
three votes for a backport and you only had your own one.
2.2.x is RTC.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 07/27/2007 10:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rederpj
Date: Fri Jul 27 13:34:41 2007
New Revision: 560373
URL:
I didn't commit it to 2.2.x. I committed it to trunk and submitted it for
backport.
Did I miss something?
Paul J. Reder
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
-1.
Please revert. You did not have enough votes for backport. You need to have
three votes for a backport and you only had your own one.
2.2.x is
On 07/28/2007 12:27 AM, Paul J. Reder wrote:
I didn't commit it to 2.2.x. I committed it to trunk and submitted it
for backport.
Did I miss something?
Argh. I am sorry. My fault. I should take more time reading my mails before
answering them. I guess I got confused because the commit
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
-1.
Please revert. You did not have enough votes for backport. You need to have
three votes for a backport and you only had your own one.
2.2.x is RTC.
This patch is to trunk, unless my tired brain is playing tricks on me:
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
