On 7/31/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> >
> >> However, if stuff is really depending on Date/Expires being what it
> >> thinks it is (*shiver*) then I guess there won't be any other options...
> >
> >
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
>
>> However, if stuff is really depending on Date/Expires being what it
>> thinks it is (*shiver*) then I guess there won't be any other options...
>
> Here's a version with a config directive, defaults to disabled.
Silly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> }
> -else if (ap_strchr_c(encoding, ':') != NULL) {
> +else if (ap_strchr_c(encoding, ',') != NULL) {
Uhm - so blowing away q val logic?
Actually, that doesn't look like a semi, that looks like a colon which
has no meaning I can thin
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:04:27 +0200
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I isolated my problem.
> It seems that sometimes during xmlFreeDoc(doc) I get a Segmentation
> fault. xmlFreeDoc is a function of libxml2 which I use inside my
> module. I suppose that libxml2 uses malloc/free to al
Okay, there is a 2.2.x branch version of the nested groups patch at
http://people.apache.org/~rederpj/NestedGroups_2.2.xBranch.diff
Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:58:27 -0400
"Paul J. Reder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm quite certain that it applies since I developed the code on 2.2
I found that a similar problem was this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-modules-dev/200703.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
So it seems that it's possibile.
I don't understand how to solve it.
Could you give me some hints?
Best regards
Marco
> Sorry I don't understand the reply.
> You ar
Hello,
I am benchmarking a JSON RPC server application that uses apache,
mod_python, and mod_ssl. I noticed that ab (Apache Bench) does not do
SSL session reuse. So I have implemented this feature as a patch to ab.c
that I have copied at the end.
One other issue is that Nagle algorithm really will
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
However, if stuff is really depending on Date/Expires being what it thinks it
is (*shiver*) then I guess there won't be any other options...
Here's a version with a config directive, defaults to disabled.
Thoughts?
/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 16:14 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I discovered some segmentation faults in apache error log.
> So I wanted to understand the reason of these errors.
> I put these statements in my module:
>
> ap_log_perror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r->pool, "0:[%ld] %s",
> (long)getpid(
On 7/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you give me a hint to solve my problem?
1st of all: compile apache, apr and apu with -ggdb flag enabled;
enable coredumps in apache config and analyze them with gdb. it always
works.
Kind regards.
I discovered some segmentation faults in apache error log.
So I wanted to understand the reason of these errors.
I put these statements in my module:
ap_log_perror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r->pool, "0:[%ld] %s",
(long)getpid());
and
ap_log_perror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r->pool, "1:[%ld] %s",
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This is correct (because provider->match is a union and provider-
>match.string and
provider->match.regex are the same thing), but confusing. I would
prefer
checking provider->match.regex instead.
Seems to me that avoiding unions altoge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's all good news. You're almost there.
In case you want to take a look, you can check out the filter function from
http://www.buanzo.com.ar/files/openpgp.conn.filter.in.c
> You have the 'content' encryption/decryptio
* Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > And BTW, as the order of the encodings in Content-Encoding must be the
> > order in which they have been applied, don't we need to ensure that
> > gzip needs to be at the *end* of the content encoding string
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:37:20PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> And BTW, as the order of the encodings in Content-Encoding must be the
> order in which they have been applied, don't we need to ensure that
> gzip needs to be at the *end* of the content encoding string, as we
> have to decode th
> Arturo wrote...
>
> Thanks for taking the time to discuss this with me.
> I really appreciate it.
>
> I was able to read a whole "pgp-encrypted" request,
> even a large 12+MB one using my code. I read the
> content-length header, then read up to that quantity of
> bytes, saving the brigades to
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The solution is to NOT rewrite the on-disk headers when the following
conditions are true:
- The body is NOT stale (ie. HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED when revalidating)
- The on-disk header hasn't expired.
- The request has max-age=0
This is perfectly OK with RF
On Mon, July 30, 2007 10:40 am, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
>> What may make this workable is the combination of "The body is NOT
>> stale"
>> with "max-age=0". The danger of not writing the headers is that an
>> entity,
>> once stale, will not be freshened when the spec says it should, and will
>> c
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Graham Leggett wrote:
What may make this workable is the combination of "The body is NOT stale"
with "max-age=0". The danger of not writing the headers is that an entity,
once stale, will not be freshened when the spec says it should, and will
cause a thundering herd of co
19 matches
Mail list logo
