Hello;
I have succeded in writing a skeleton module which loads and runs falcon
scripts and template documents in apache2.0.
Falcon is a light, fast, open source and complete embeddable scripting
language. See http://www.falconpl.org.
There are still many missing features do be implemented in
Hi all!
I've uploaded a httpd 2.2.6-adapted version of our mod_disk_cache
jumbo patch that we're using at ftp.acc.umu.se to
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39380
for those who wants a one-patch solution to using our modifications.
The only changes from the last version is
What is your setting for ThreadsPerChild?
On my Linux each thread consumes 8MB of virtual memory (I assume for stack and
other
thread private data) as shown by pmap. This can sum up to a large amount of
memory.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/21/2007 12:29 PM, Apache Dev wrote:
I tried asking
The default of 25 threads. 8MB * 25 = 200MB. Very helpful. Stack size.
Doh. Why didn't I think of that. This should of course affect Prefork as
well. The stack size must be less than 10MB with it. Does Apache change
the stack size with Prefork? Or, is Linux handling the VM needs differently?
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I've uploaded a httpd 2.2.6-adapted version of our mod_disk_cache jumbo
patch that we're using at ftp.acc.umu.se to
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39380
for those who wants a one-patch solution to using our modifications.
I am keen to revisit this
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
Could we start by increasing the existing one, which is rather easily
done, and then move on to doing it the fancy way? If someone has a
fancy-patch right now I'm all for that, but pending that I'd prefer
landing some sort of improvement...
Sounds reasonable.
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
What is your setting for ThreadsPerChild?
On my Linux each thread consumes 8MB of virtual memory (I assume for
stack and other thread private data) as shown by pmap. This can sum
up to a large amount of memory.
This is due to linux libc setting
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
Could we start by increasing the existing one, which is rather easily
done, and then move on to doing it the fancy way? If someone has a
fancy-patch right now I'm all for that, but pending that I'd prefer
landing some sort of improvement...
I don't quite see the
