Hi All,
Is there any free tool available that analyzes Apache error and access
logs?
Thanks in advance.
-A
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> You are correct. This is only fixed in trunk so far. You are affected by
> PR41056 (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41056).
> I just proposed the patch from trunk for backport. Please find the
> patch attached for your convenience.
>
thanks for patch,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
First question, are there testers who will test/vote on the module?
I'm game for testing. Our environment is strictly anonftp read-only
though, so I won't test the non-anon stuff. Having the thing work with
mod_cache would be absolute bliss, bu
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'll take an effort in addressing them... I think the
issues are due to the fact that the actual updates to
the doccos lagged behind changes to the codebase...
Are you certain? Do we mean to test 'wrowe' on poweruser.example.com
is the same person as 'wrowe' on newbie.exam
On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601843&view=rev
Log:
Come closer to a release by backing-up the version from Covalent-
numbering
series to an ASF numbering series, and prepare for the first GA
release
to be numbered 1.0.0.
>
> T
I'll take an effort in addressing them... I think the
issues are due to the fact that the actual updates to
the doccos lagged behind changes to the codebase...
Realistically, I won't have cycles until mid-nextweek
On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:03 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
There seems to be severa
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=601843&view=rev
Log:
Come closer to a release by backing-up the version from Covalent-numbering
series to an ASF numbering series, and prepare for the first GA release
to be numbered 1.0.0.
>
> This means 0.9.0 is an obvious numbering schema for alpha/beta's.