Re: svn commit: r721020 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in srclib/pcre/

2008-11-28 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: pquerna > Date: Wed Nov 26 14:53:34 2008 > New Revision: 721020 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721020&view=rev > Log: > Stop bundling PCRE in trunk. Definitely needs an entry in CHANGES IMHO. -- ---

Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-28 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: > mod_perl comes to mind too. yeah really *cough* -- Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) c:703.336.9354 Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. - http://p6m7g8.net 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 7

Re: error code overlap -- AP_FILTER_ERROR vs. SUSPENDED

2008-11-28 Thread Paul Querna
Eric Covener wrote: There are a couple of places, in trunk only, where the macro SUSPENDED is checked against a handlers return code. 1 45 include/util_filter.h <> #define AP_FILTER_ERROR -3 1460 include/httpd.h <> #define SUSPENDED -3 Uhm, Util filt

error code overlap -- AP_FILTER_ERROR vs. SUSPENDED

2008-11-28 Thread Eric Covener
There are a couple of places, in trunk only, where the macro SUSPENDED is checked against a handlers return code. 1 45 include/util_filter.h <> #define AP_FILTER_ERROR -3 1460 include/httpd.h <> #define SUSPENDED -3 Note that AP_FILTER_ERROR can be retur

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-28 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Any objections going with autoconf 2.63 and libtool 1.5.26? > > If autoconf 2.63 is seen as too risky I would go back to autoconf 2.61. I see no remaining issues for 2.63... solid choice. The endianess issues of 2.62 should all be addressed.

Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-28 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
mod_perl comes to mind too. To a lesser extend mod_security and mod_macro. ~Jorge On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/28/2008 06:58 PM, Sander Temme wrote: >> >> On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote: >> >>> FYI, I intend to roll 2.3

Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-28 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/28/2008 06:58 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in >> about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. > > +1, let's get that code out there. > > As part of this process, I would like

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-28 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/28/2008 06:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb: >> >> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >>> Von: Paul Querna >>> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55 >>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R >>> >>

Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-28 Thread Paul Querna
Sander Temme wrote: On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote: FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. +1, let's get that code out there. As part of this process, I would like us (the group) to identify *early* which

Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-28 Thread Sander Temme
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote: FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. +1, let's get that code out there. As part of this process, I would like us (the group) to identify *early* which third party module

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-28 Thread Rainer Jung
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb: > > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Paul Querna >> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55 >> An: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R >> >> Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: >>> What are our prefe

Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-28 Thread Paul Querna
Hi dev@, FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. As in the previous 2.${odd} release cycles, this is not a stable release, do not guarantee a stable ABI, and would not be recommended for production usage:

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-28 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Paul Querna > Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R > > Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > > What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-28 Thread Paul Querna
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for T&R on the weekend? As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems. I'm not actually sure now days what specific version should be used, I haven't done RM in a while :-/ Just make sure you use a

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-28 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for T&R on the weekend? As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems. Regards Rüdiger