What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for TR on the weekend?
As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems.
Regards
Rüdiger
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for TR on the weekend?
As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems.
I'm not actually sure now days what specific version should be used, I
haven't done RM in a while :-/
Just make sure you use a
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for TR
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for
TR on
Hi dev@,
FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in about
3 years, on Saturday December 6th.
As in the previous 2.${odd} release cycles, this is not a stable
release, do not guarantee a stable ABI, and would not be recommended for
production usage:
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for TR
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
What are our preferred versions of
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in
about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th.
+1, let's get that code out there.
As part of this process, I would like us (the group) to identify
*early* which third party
Sander Temme wrote:
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in
about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th.
+1, let's get that code out there.
As part of this process, I would like us (the group) to identify *early*
On 11/28/2008 06:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for TR
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
On 11/28/2008 06:58 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in
about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th.
+1, let's get that code out there.
As part of this process, I would like us (the
mod_perl comes to mind too.
To a lesser extend mod_security and mod_macro.
~Jorge
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/2008 06:58 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Any objections going with autoconf 2.63 and libtool 1.5.26?
If autoconf 2.63 is seen as too risky I would go back to autoconf 2.61.
I see no remaining issues for 2.63... solid choice. The endianess
issues of 2.62 should all be addressed.
There are a couple of places, in trunk only, where the macro SUSPENDED
is checked against a handlers return code.
1 45 include/util_filter.h GLOBAL
#define AP_FILTER_ERROR -3
1460 include/httpd.h GLOBAL
#define SUSPENDED -3
Note that AP_FILTER_ERROR can
Eric Covener wrote:
There are a couple of places, in trunk only, where the macro SUSPENDED
is checked against a handlers return code.
1 45 include/util_filter.h GLOBAL
#define AP_FILTER_ERROR -3
1460 include/httpd.h GLOBAL
#define SUSPENDED -3
Uhm,
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
mod_perl comes to mind too.
yeah really *cough* mod perl committer
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
c:703.336.9354
Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. - http://p6m7g8.net
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Wed Nov 26 14:53:34 2008
New Revision: 721020
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721020view=rev
Log:
Stop bundling PCRE in trunk.
Definitely needs an entry in CHANGES IMHO.
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
