{eos,aruroa}.apache.org, aka www.apache.org have both been upgraded to
2.3.0.
If anyone sees anything odd, please let me know.
Thanks,
Paul
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
In 2.3.x, mod_unixd is split out form the mpm.
Which raises a good point...
Wouldn't it be better if mod_unixd, mod_version, and mod_so when enabled
were all compiled into the core? They all seem pretty essential.
All my customer builds always compile in
Custom compile on Gentoo (x86) +1
~Jorge
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Res [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+1
Tested on the following environments:
Solaris 8 SPARC
Solaris 9 SPARC
Solaris 10 SPARC
Red Hat AS 4 32 Bit (x86)
Red Hat AS 4 64 Bit
On 12/07/2008 12:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
In 2.3.x, mod_unixd is split out form the mpm.
Which raises a good point...
Wouldn't it be better if mod_unixd, mod_version, and mod_so when enabled
were all compiled into the core? They all seem pretty
On 7 Dec 2008, at 11:24, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Similarly, I would rather have httpd tell me I'm on a unixd-style
platform
instead of second guessing the modules to enable. Any reason not
to load
it, ever, on a unixd platform?
Yes, potentially.
Dependencies on ap_unixd_config are
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 , tested on EC2 with Ubuntu and Redhat :-)
--
Colm
I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is
likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk.
The obvious name, mod_lua, is a bit tricky as there are about half a
dozen projects named mod_lua -- most of which are dead.
I don't have a really good
Brian McCallister wrote:
I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is
likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk.
The obvious name, mod_lua, is a bit tricky as there are about half a
dozen projects named mod_lua -- most of which are dead.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Paul Querna wrote:
Any other ideas?
mod_lua_wombat ?
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP
http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html
Mailing List Archives at http://archiver.mailfighter.net
2008/12/6 Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
builds/runs (default config) on OSX 10.5.5
--
Michal Grzedzicki
Paul Querna wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
+1 to renaming, but I'm not sure we can or should call it mod_lua.
Any other ideas?
mod_pony:-)
Cheers,
Tony
Shariq, Thanks for your reply, I think we can use the Shared memory if we have
one file which has to be shared among all the process/thread, but my problem is
i have 100's of files in directory and i need to store them all in a hash map
and arrays.
Also I need to malloc the arrays
On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha
versions.
Best. Place. Ever. to try out our stuff to find and fix bugs.
Especially nasty edge cases like this one.
www.apache.org should run dogfood whenever possible.
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for
rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version.
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions.
We have always run -alpha versions, even with experimental MPMs on our
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+1 on renaming.
I still have to look up what it is every now and then. (Mostly due to
forgetting what it does all the time though)
mod_lua_handler, mod_lua_config meh I'm not good with names.
metal note: look at lua and mod_soonnottobewombat to replace to
replace buggy mod_perl stuff.
~Jorge
16 matches
Mail list logo
