fredk2 wrote:
Hi Nick,
I looked at the code (I am not a coder) and wondered what made you say it's
geared clearly to the very small server.
It gives you the overhead of reading the entire scoreboard for
every request. You don't want to do that with high traffic,
nor with anything but a very
Hi William and Mladen,
Thanks both of you but i am still struggling with my thread creation. I
create my background thread inside the balancer_init method at
mod_proxy_balancer module. But after finished the execution of balancer_init
method my thread also terminate automatically please help me
Hi Iroshan and All,
Same problem here. I passed function with infinite while loop when creating
the thread . Thread creation is done inside a function of another module.
But after call the module function thread also terminate. What are the steps
that I have missed here.
Thank you.
Shaniro
shaniro herath wrote:
Hi Iroshan and All,
Same problem here. I passed function with infinite while loop when
creating the thread . Thread creation is done inside a function of
another module. But after call the module function thread also
terminate. What are the steps that I have missed
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
fredk2 wrote:
Hi Nick,
I looked at the code (I am not a coder) and wondered what made you say
it's
geared clearly to the very small server.
It gives you the overhead of reading the entire scoreboard for
every request.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com
mailto:n...@webthing.com wrote:
fredk2 wrote:
Hi Nick,
I looked at the code (I am not a coder) and wondered what made
you say it's
geared clearly to the very small server.
Hi,
Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky.
How about having any/all of these directives?
# time between accept(2) call and the full request has been read.
RequestTimeout 1
# minimum bandwith the user should have available to access this server.
MinInRate 2KB/s
MinOutRate
Nick Kew wrote:
I've actually hacked up mod_noloris to do exactly that. Was planning to
test-drive then post, but since you bring the matter up, I'll attach it
here and now.
Having already fixed a couple of typos in the attachment,
I've uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~niq/mod_noloris.c
Gonzalo Arana wrote:
Hi,
Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky.
How about having any/all of these directives?
# time between accept(2) call and the full request has been read.
RequestTimeout 1
# minimum bandwith the user should have available to access this server.
MinInRate
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Nick Kewn...@webthing.com wrote:
Gonzalo Arana wrote:
Hi,
Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky.
How about having any/all of these directives?
# time between accept(2) call and the full request has been read.
RequestTimeout 1
Also interested
To avoid a ban on 89.0.0.13 also banning 9.0.0.1, we might want to
include the separators in the strstr, as in the attached patch.
--- mod_noloris.c-orig 2009-07-01 08:57:32.0 -0400
+++ mod_noloris.c 2009-07-01 09:15:21.918474373 -0400
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
* accepts a conn_rec.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Nick Kewn...@webthing.com wrote:
Gonzalo Arana wrote:
Hi,
Keeping whitelist up to date is rather tricky.
How about having any/all of these directives?
# time between accept(2) call and the full request has been read.
RequestTimeout 1
# minimum bandwith
h iroshan wrote:
Hi William and Mladen,
Thanks both of you but i am still struggling with my thread creation. I
create my background thread inside the balancer_init method at
mod_proxy_balancer module. But after finished the execution of
balancer_init method my thread also terminate
tOn 01.07.2009 17:01, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009
New Revision: 790205
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790205view=rev
Log:
mod_noloris just moved from discussion to attracting its first patch
on d...@. That means it wants to be in svn. Adding
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009
New Revision: 790205
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790205view=rev
Log:
mod_noloris just moved from discussion to attracting its first patch
on d...@. That means it wants to be in svn.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I am not sure if doing this for each connection (not each *request*)
is really that much of a performace hit. I used a modified version of
mod_limitipcon and do just that. So far I haven't noticed any performance
issues with this approach. But maybe with a maximum of
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+ * The major difference is that mod_antiloris checks the scoreboard
+ * on every request. This implies a per-request overhead that grows
+ * with the scoreboard, and gets very expensive on a big server.
+ * On the other hand, this module (mod_noloris) may be slower to
+
Hi,
please can anybody roughly tell me how to register a new thread under the
main child thread pool .It is great help for me.
Shaniro Herath.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
h iroshan wrote:
Hi William and Mladen,
Thanks both of you
18 matches
Mail list logo
