William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> wr...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: wrowe
>> Date: Fri Jul 24 18:54:39 2009
>> New Revision: 797603
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797603&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Remove hop by hop headers and set Connection: close to convince
>> all fastcgi consumers that they
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Peter Sylvester wrote:
There is some non-portable code round there that accesses extensions
in a most
convoluted fashion for some unknown reason.
the stuff in ..vars.c ssl_ext_list?
Well that too but was mainly thinking of the extension handling
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> For trunk, it should be committed. Casts are generally signs of a dumb
> compiler or poor coding design and must be avoided.
done:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=798989
> I'm generally -1 for stylistic cleanup backports. Although it might bri
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Pity that ml.exe support was stripped (ms\do_masm), it would be a shame
>> for most VC users to drop asm optimizations.
>
> This was mainly due to problems in using some of the more advanced features
> needed by the latest optimisations in
Peter Sylvester wrote:
>
>
>> There is some non-portable code round there that accesses extensions
>> in a most
>> convoluted fashion for some unknown reason.
>>
> the stuff in ..vars.c ssl_ext_list?
Well that too but was mainly thinking of the extension handling code in
ssl_util_ssl.c the lo
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> Pity that ml.exe support was stripped (ms\do_masm), it would be a shame
> for most VC users to drop asm optimizations.
>
>
This was mainly due to problems in using some of the more advanced features
needed by the latest optimisations in all versions of MASM. Diff
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Peter Sylvester schrieb:
>> A little nit in ssl_engine_init.c:
>> instead of
>>
>> -SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(ctx, (STACK *)ca_list);
>> +SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(ctx, (STACK_OF(X509_NAME) *)ca_list);
>>
>> I think I'd prefer
>> +SSL_CTX
On 07/29/2009 01:52 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
> A backtrace is available in the bug report, but it does not reveal much:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537665#30
Right, it is not really helpful, but as you seem to be able to reproduce
the issue can you please create a bac
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> One helpful detail, Stefan, would be if this is worker-specific or can
> be reproduced with prefork. That helps narrow down the number of places
> to consider your question.
This happened with prefork, Debian supports mod_php only with prefork.
> As I recall, we ha
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> far as I understand it, the reason is that mod_php uses ap_rwrite
>> which creates transient buckets. When the connection is closed by the
>> client, these buckets sometimes stay in the bucket brigade when
>> ap_pass_brigade returns an error for the compressed data of an
>>
Hi Lionel,
since no other replied to your post I try to answer your questions ...
Lionel VICTOR (free) schrieb:
> I'm trying to bring some attention on Bug 29744.
its always helpful if you post a link to the bug like this:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29744
> This bug is rel
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 7/28/09 1:35 PM, "Stefan Fritsch" wrote:
>
> > I have backported r791454 to 2.2.3 in Debian 4.0 and have received a
> > report [1] about segfaults with mod_deflate and mod_php (5.2.0).
>
> Isn't php only officially supported via fastcgi?
Instead it is another cleanup which should go the usual way = apply in
HEAD, propose for backport. Please lets separate these things - the
bigger we make the one 2.2.x backport patch the lesser the other
developers are in the mood to review it.
I agree.
Hi Peter,
Peter Sylvester schrieb:
> A little nit in ssl_engine_init.c:
> instead of
>
> -SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(ctx, (STACK *)ca_list);
> +SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(ctx, (STACK_OF(X509_NAME) *)ca_list);
>
> I think I'd prefer
> +SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(ctx, ca_lis
14 matches
Mail list logo
