Hello,
CHANGES states;
*) mod_proxy_scgi: Backport from trunk. [André Malo]
There are no Windows build files for this module. To hopefully soften
the grief a little I may have a head start. I think I've covered all the
bases, sorry I forgot to donate this over the weekend.
Regards.
Hi,
I would like to change the doall / ap_slotmem_callback_fn_t logic.
For the moment we can't stop the doall loop, but it could be interesting
to do so (for example while search for a value in the slotmems).
My idea is to return APR_SUCCESS when done and APR_INCOMPLETE if we want
to go on
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
Don't forget your BSD vs FSF nonsense...
FSF - http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/mod_fcgid-2.3.2.tar.gz.md5
BSD - http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/mod_fcgid-2.3.2-crlf.zip.md5
naa, already covered:
http://www.gknw.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=570
Hi,
Jie Gao schrieb:
/usr/local/src/httpd-2.2.14/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -fast -DSOLARIS2=10 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
-D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DAP_DEBUG
-I/usr/local/src/httpd-2.2.14/srclib/pcre -I.
Hi,
Guenter Knauf schrieb:
can you perhaps review and verify if this patch fixes the Sun Studio
warnings in shm.c?
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/shm.c.diff
whole file apr/shmem/unix/shm.c:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/shm.c
Maybe I did something wrong, but at least it
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Jie Gao schrieb:
/usr/local/src/httpd-2.2.14/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -fast -DSOLARIS2=10 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
-D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DAP_DEBUG
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf
Sent: Dienstag, 29. September 2009 13:10
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; APR Developer List
Subject: Re: [PATCH-REVIEW] shm.c
Hi,
Guenter Knauf schrieb:
can you perhaps review and verify if this patch fixes the Sun Studio
warnings in shm.c?
On 29.09.2009 13:25, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org
mailto:fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Jie Gao schrieb:
/usr/local/src/httpd-2.2.14/srclib/apr/libtool --silent
--mode=compile /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -fast
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the right
place to ask.
I'm using mod_fcgid from svn with HTTPD 2.2.
I want to use a fast CGI authorizer to allow me to control access based
on my rules.
The authorizer needs to be a long running process - never exits.
I know that
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukwrote:
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the right place
to ask.
I'm using mod_fcgid from svn with HTTPD 2.2.
I want to use a fast CGI authorizer to allow me to control access based on
my rules.
Hi,
just for fun I did a compile of the 2.2.x branch on OpenSuSE 11.1-64
with some more gcc warnings than what we normally use:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/warnings/conf.sh.txt
result:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/warnings/ap22xbuild.txt.gz
while most of them can be ignored, I think at
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Quick on the heels of mod_fcgid 2.3.1 we have another candidate for your
consideration, with many improvements to docs and especially the
authn/authz
interface.
Please fetch up the newly minted
Graham Leggett wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.14 as GA
With 6 binding +1's, vote passes.
Will move the binaries across tonight for the mirrors to pick them up,
and will prepare the announcement to go out 24 hours after.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the
right place to ask.
I'm using mod_fcgid from svn with HTTPD 2.2.
I want to use a
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukwrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukmailto:
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the
right place
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
Ricardo Cantu wrote:
That's the problem with mod_fcgid right now with out the patch.
argv[0] is different but mod_fcgid is not considering it different. It is
lumping together by inode only and not paying attention to basename
(argv[0]).
Which can be different when using symbolic
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukwrote:
Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukmailto:
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.comwrote:
Ricardo Cantu wrote:
That's the problem with mod_fcgid right now with out the patch.
argv[0] is different but mod_fcgid is not considering it different. It is
lumping together by inode only and not paying
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 12:14:51 pm you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.comwrote:
Ricardo Cantu wrote:
That's the problem with mod_fcgid right now with out the patch.
argv[0] is different but mod_fcgid is not considering it different. It
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote:
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 12:14:51 pm you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com
wrote:
Ricardo Cantu wrote:
That's the problem with mod_fcgid right now with out the
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 1:22:56 pm you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote:
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 12:14:51 pm you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com
wrote:
Ricardo Cantu wrote:
I borrowed a few ideas from my friends and botched the rest personally:
(omitting FCGID prefix)
leave alone
AccessChecker
AccessCheckerAuthoritative
Authenticator
AuthenticatorAuthoritative
Authorizer
AuthorizerAuthoritative
Wrapper
MaxRequestsPerProcess
PassHeader
concepts need to be fixed or
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 2:31:21 pm Jeff Trawick wrote:
I borrowed a few ideas from my friends and botched the rest personally:
(omitting FCGID prefix)
leave alone
AccessChecker
AccessCheckerAuthoritative
Authenticator
AuthenticatorAuthoritative
Authorizer
On Monday 28 September 2009, Dan Poirier wrote:
Is there some good reason not to log the 408's in this case?
I am +1 for logging the 408's. I also think in case of a timeout, 408
should be logged instead of 400. The attached patch does that.
--- protocol.c.orig 2009-09-05 00:36:31.448689825
Graham Leggett wrote:
Will move the binaries across tonight for the mirrors to pick them up,
and will prepare the announcement to go out 24 hours after.
Still waiting for www.apache.org/dist/httpd to pick up the binaries,
have pinging infra to see if there is anything wrong.
Regards,
Graham
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote:
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 2:31:21 pm Jeff Trawick wrote:
ZombieScanInterval (leave alone until processes can be reaped
differently)
Working on a patch for this one. Don't want to duplicate work, so let me
know
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
SpawnScore - SpawnScoreSpawnCost
SpawnScoreUpLimit - SpawnScoreLimit
TerminationScore - SpawnScoreExitCost
TimeScore - SpawnScoreDecayPerSecond
These names are pretty ugly :( Here is what they are for, in case that
29 matches
Mail list logo
