Hi
I downloaded apache_2.2.8-win32-x86-no_ssl and installed apache http
server 2.2.8 in windows 32 bit env.
After modifying httpd.conf file I am not able to start apache server.
When I checked the syntax of httpd.conf file by issuing the command
httpd.exe –t it says Cannot load mod_uio.so into
When I checked the syntax of httpd.conf file by issuing the command
httpd.exe –t it says Cannot load mod_uio.so into server. The specified
module could not be found.
Please reply which dll/package is required to download in windows env.
Ask the vendor of mod_uio.so, not a list about
On 12/2/2011 10:23 PM, KESTAR wrote:
Hi
I downloaded apache_2.2.8-win32-x86-no_ssl and installed apache http
server 2.2.8 in windows 32 bit env.
After modifying httpd.conf file I am not able to start apache server.
When I checked the syntax of httpd.conf file by issuing the command
httpd.exe
If you count all those chars, you'll get 1920. Anybody knows what's going
on?
yep. ServerLimit * ThreadLimit (defaulted) = 30 * 64 = 1920
Hmm, that's indeed the case. I was perplexed by wording there.
Those ServerLimits and ThreadLimits could be set automatically, based on
user's
While googling why one of my compilers would error out on this, it
revealed that the __FUNCTION__ macro is C99 and not ANSI nor C89, and
for now westillwant to support C89 AFAIK. I do not remember a
go-ahead
with C99 code. Did I miss that?
Unfortunately, you didn't miss it.
Cheers,
- Original Message -
If you count all those chars, you'll get 1920. Anybody knows
what's going
on?
yep. ServerLimit * ThreadLimit (defaulted) = 30 * 64 = 1920
Hmm, that's indeed the case. I was perplexed by wording there.
Those ServerLimits and ThreadLimits could be set
fuck off and delete my email from your list...I have tried many times..You
are bullshit !!
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Yuri Arabadji y...@fused.com wrote:
Hi.
It appears that someone messed up scoreboard in httpd 2.2.
We've got mpm worker with the following config:
fuck off and delete my email from your list...I have tried many times..You
are bullshit !!
2011/12/2 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org
While googling why one of my compilers would error out on this, it
revealed that the __FUNCTION__ macro is C99 and not ANSI nor C89, and
for now
Thanks Tom for your answer,
But it's not working for the IP-based part, what is the default vhost for
IP-based vhost?
Also i am using IP-based because of SSL on one Name-based vhost and SSL
the Ip-based vhost.
Regards,
Tom Evans-3 wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:34 AM, ipmanux
Greetings,
I noticed that htcacheclean won't clean expired entries unless the
specified size limit is reached. Is there any specific reason for this ?
I'm looking into freeing up some inodes on some of my servers where the
total cache size hasn't reached my specified limit. Would it be
On 02 Dec 2011, at 8:52 PM, Rob Landrito wrote:
I noticed that htcacheclean won't clean expired entries unless the specified
size limit is reached.
That's by design.
Is there any specific reason for this ? I'm looking into freeing up some
inodes on some of my servers where the total
On 03 Dec 2011, at 12:42 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Fri Dec 2 22:42:39 2011
New Revision: 1209754
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209754view=rev
Log:
mod_proxy: Make ap_proxy_retry_worker() into an optional function. Allows
mod_lbmethod_bybusyness,
On Friday 02 December 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 03 Dec 2011, at 12:42 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Fri Dec 2 22:42:39 2011
New Revision: 1209754
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209754view=rev
Log:
mod_proxy: Make ap_proxy_retry_worker() into
On Thursday 01 December 2011, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Any more comments/thoughts?
As nobody disagreed, this is now in trunk. I intend to commit it to
2.4 tomorrow.
It's already a big step forward and the finishing touches can be done
in 2.4.1.
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
Blockers:
mod_proxy_scgi.c needs to be fixed for compilation with C89 (easy)
The only blocker left in STATUS is this:
* Modules that are not ready for production use must be removed.
The same for modules without documentation.
I think we have already removed
On 12/2/2011 5:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
Blockers:
mod_proxy_scgi.c needs to be fixed for compilation with C89 (easy)
The only blocker left in STATUS is this:
* Modules that are not ready for production use must be removed.
The same for modules without
On 12/2/2011 6:08 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/2/2011 5:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
Blockers:
mod_proxy_scgi.c needs to be fixed for compilation with C89 (easy)
The only blocker left in STATUS is this:
* Modules that are not ready for production use
On 12/2/2011 6:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/2/2011 6:08 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/2/2011 5:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
where are we WRT 2.4?
Blockers:
mod_proxy_scgi.c needs to be fixed for compilation with C89 (easy)
The only blocker left in STATUS is this:
*
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- modules docs
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_watchdog
- mod_heartbeat
- mod_heartmonitor
- mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
I vote these off the Windows boat, mod_watchdog crashes the
19 matches
Mail list logo
