Re: Issue in building Apache 2.2.21 src in AIX 7.1 with GCC.

2011-12-12 Thread rajasun
>> httpd modules.lo buildmark.o -export-dynamic -Wl,-uXML_Parse >But seriously, what is this ^ -- What's -Wl,-uXML_Parse ? >Effectively this is an LDFLAG -uXML_Parse - but what's that do? >Why is it there? >According to: > > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/aix/v7r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fco

Re: svn commit: r1210378 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_expr_eval.c

2011-12-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 13 December 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Am 05.12.2011 10:38, schrieb s...@apache.org: > > Author: sf > > Date: Mon Dec 5 09:38:44 2011 > > New Revision: 1210378 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210378&view=rev > > Log: > > Fix a few compiler warning repor

Re: svn commit: r1210378 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util_expr_eval.c

2011-12-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Stefan, Am 05.12.2011 10:38, schrieb s...@apache.org: Author: sf Date: Mon Dec 5 09:38:44 2011 New Revision: 1210378 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210378&view=rev Log: Fix a few compiler warning reported by Steffen: - some signed/unsigned mismatches - const for a function does not m

Re: Effective IP address / real IP address

2011-12-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
I have a frustrating update, which we need to take into consideration for the whole remote_ip-related resolution. From the httpd-ng workgroup... On 09/12/2011, at 9:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote to http-ng; > On 12/8/2011 12:33 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: >> Le 8 déc. 2011 à 14:55, Larry Masinter

Re: [RFC] further proxy/rewrite URL validation security issue (CVE-2011-4317)

2011-12-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Don't know whether that could happen here, but could "OPTIONS *" be >> a problem? > > Hmmm, another good question. > > What should mod_rewrite or mod_proxy's translate_name hook do f

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday 11 December 2011, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 11 Dec 2011, at 15:01, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are > > close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... > > > > My plan is to T&R sometime this week... > > +1. BTW, is there any r

Re: Issue in building Apache 2.2.21 src in AIX 7.1 with GCC.

2011-12-12 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > I am a newbie to apache build process. I have tried to build the > apache > v2.2.21 source on AIX 7.1 (with GNU compiler setup) with the > following > configure options. The config.log is attached > http://old.nabble.com/file/p32958809/config.log config.log . > ./

Issue in building Apache 2.2.21 src in AIX 7.1 with GCC.

2011-12-12 Thread rajasun
I am a newbie to apache build process. I have tried to build the apache v2.2.21 source on AIX 7.1 (with GNU compiler setup) with the following configure options. The config.log is attached http://old.nabble.com/file/p32958809/config.log config.log . ./configure --prefix=/var/www/httpd --with-incl

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 12, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, zhiguo zhao wrote: >> mod_lua document is not match with source code. >> A lot of instruction removed or added. > > I don't personally see this as a release blocker. The doc says it's > experimental, and what's

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, zhiguo zhao wrote: > mod_lua document is not match with source code. > A lot of instruction removed or added. I don't personally see this as a release blocker. The doc says it's experimental, and what's there largely works (AFAIK) Specific shortcomings in bugzill

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread zhiguo zhao
mod_lua document is not match with source code. A lot of instruction removed or added. 2011/12/12 Eric Covener > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, zhiguo zhao wrote: > > -1 > > > > I think document is not finished. > > Which documents specifically? I think we'll settle for a long way > from "fi