:-)
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Montag, 13. Februar 2012 08:20
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1
Lame mathematician joke: 2.4 at 2^4 (16th Apache birthday).
Regards,
Rainer
On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and
build directly from .dsw/.dsp files.
Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks
and I cannot make that working on windoze).
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:55, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
PR 52402 works for me, not with the configuration in the PR, but these
errors are gone
As long as I point BalancerMember to other machines, it works just fine
I have the same now using an external server. With the localhost
As I currently a svn client I would appreciate a downloadable something
that I can apply my build scripts too. They complete now, (will update
different thread shortly) so I would like to verifythem all asap for the
2.4.1.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 Feb 2012, at 2:48 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
As I currently a svn client I would appreciate a downloadable something
that I can apply my build scripts too. They complete now, (will update
different thread shortly) so I would like to verifythem all asap for the
2.4.1.
All development
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
Windows32 2.2.22 with APR 1.4.6 and zlib 1.2.6 available at
http://www.apachelounge.com/
Notes:
In the announcement there is a mention of APR-util 1.4.2, can only find
1.4.1, do I miss something ?
At http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/ the file CURRENT-IS-2.2.21 must be
2.2.22
-Original
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656
Hi,
I have just subscribed to the apr-list because http://apr.apache.org/mailing-
lists.html says:
quote
If you have patches or suggestions, feel free to share them with this list.
/quote
For quite a time now I have this idea how a certain type of pool user data can
be made faster.
It would
On 08.02.2012 14:01, Oğuzhan TOPGÜL wrote:
Hi all,
I have developed an apache module and i want to evaluate the performance of
my module.
I want to see how my module increases the load. I want to measure the
effect of my module on processor and memory.
I decided to set an evaluation environment
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the
On 2/13/2012 1:07 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and
build directly from .dsw/.dsp files.
Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks
and I
Known: my apr does not have ldap configured into it.
attached: the stderr and verbose output to tty,
new build/aix files
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org wrote:
On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
root@fox:/usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.1# /etc/rc.d/rc.httpd start
httpd: Syntax error on line 55 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Module
On 2/13/2012 7:07 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
If you didn't have to rebuild mod_php5 between httpd 2.2 and 2.4.0,
that was our (serious) error fixed in 2.4.1. You
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 20:05 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/13/2012 7:07 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
If you didn't have to rebuild mod_php5 between
16 matches
Mail list logo
