Would anyone object to the NPN patch (r1332643) being backported to 2.2 and 2.4?
I'm curious what the status of 2.4.x-on-Windows is... What else
can we do to speed this along?
2.2.x/STATUS
2.4.x/STATUS
On May 3, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Would anyone object to the NPN patch (r1332643) being backported to 2.2 and
2.4?
Am 25.04.2012 13:10, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Therefore I believe that its safe to always compile gen_test_char.c with
the build compiler without APR and without libtool; just like:
$(CC_FOR_BUILD) gen_test_char.c -o gen_test_char
If we would agree to this then we wouldnt need any special
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Brand [mailto:httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch]
Sent: Sonntag, 29. April 2012 09:59
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1
Hi --
It's been a remarkably long time since I had anything useful
to commit, and I'm pretty rusty, so I thought I'd throw this out for
discussion as a RTC despite the CTR rules on trunk. I promise I won't
be offended if anyone says it's a stupid hack and should never be
committed, because,
- Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.com wrote:
Hi --
It's been a remarkably long time since I had anything useful
to commit, and I'm pretty rusty, so I thought I'd throw this out for
discussion as a RTC despite the CTR rules on trunk. I promise I won't
be offended if anyone says it's a
