Re: [VOTE] accept mod_macro as standard module in httpd

2013-01-03 Thread Gregg Smith
On 1/2/2013 6:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote: I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original vote thread was more of a discussion. I wanted to record a formal vote here so I can link to it. Pending IP clearance... [+1] accept mod_macro as a standard module and responsibility for

Re: svn commit: r1428184 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4

2013-01-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:23:27AM -, kbr...@apache.org wrote: Author: kbrand Date: Thu Jan 3 07:23:27 2013 New Revision: 1428184 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1428184view=rev Log: Improve pkg-config usage for mod_ssl/ab: also use pkg-config for determining the -l flags

Re: [VOTE] accept mod_macro as standard module in httpd

2013-01-03 Thread André Malo
* Eric Covener wrote: I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original vote thread was more of a discussion. I wanted to record a formal vote here so I can link to it. Pending IP clearance... [+1] accept mod_macro as a standard module and responsibility for its maintenance

[Discuss] mod_lua and database connectivity

2013-01-03 Thread Daniel Gruno
Hello, fellow dev@ people, it's time for my monthly mod_lua rambling! This time, I have set my eyes on creating bindings for the apr_dbd features and mod_dbd in httpd. The purpose of this would be to both enable people to easily use databases for Lua scripts, as well as lua modules (hooks) in a

Re: svn commit: r1428184 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4

2013-01-03 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 03.01.2013 12:20, Joe Orton wrote: add --static to pkg-config invocations, so that libraries for static linking are also taken into account (PR 54252 - note that the additional flags will only appear in modules/ssl/modules.mk and ab_LDFLAGS, so potential side effects are limited) This is

Re: svn commit: r1428184 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4

2013-01-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 02:00:22PM +0100, Kaspar Brand wrote: On 03.01.2013 12:20, Joe Orton wrote: add --static to pkg-config invocations, so that libraries for static linking are also taken into account (PR 54252 - note that the additional flags will only appear in modules/ssl/modules.mk

Re: [VOTE] accept mod_macro as standard module in httpd

2013-01-03 Thread Rich Bowen
On Jan 2, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote: I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original vote thread was more of a discussion. I wanted to record a formal vote here so I can link to it. Pending IP clearance... [+1] accept mod_macro as a standard module and

Re: mod_lbmethod_byrequests required to define a BalancerMember

2013-01-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
We should be able to defer that until we actually *need* to start, as we do with other settings in trunk. I can work on that in trunk and the propose a backport to 2.4... On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: When defining a balancer, mod_lbmethod_byrequests is

Re: [VOTE] accept mod_macro as standard module in httpd

2013-01-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1! On Jan 2, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original vote thread was more of a discussion. I wanted to record a formal vote here so I can link to it. Pending IP clearance... [+1] accept mod_macro as a

Re: mod_lbmethod_byrequests required to define a BalancerMember

2013-01-03 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: We should be able to defer that until we actually *need* to start, as we do with other settings in trunk. I can work on that in trunk and the propose a backport to 2.4... That would be great, I probably won't bother with

Re: mod_lbmethod_byrequests required to define a BalancerMember

2013-01-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'll work on it tomorrow... a quick look indicates its a simple patch. On Jan 3, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: We should be able to defer that until we actually *need* to start, as we do with other

Re: [VOTE] accept mod_macro as standard module in httpd

2013-01-03 Thread Graham Leggett
On 3 Jan 2013, at 02:06, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original vote thread was more of a discussion. I wanted to record a formal vote here so I can link to it. Pending IP clearance... [+1] accept mod_macro as a standard

Re: [Discuss] mod_lua and database connectivity

2013-01-03 Thread Brian McCallister
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote: - Connecting to a database: - function handler(r) local db, error = r:dbopen(mod_dbd) -- Open a mod_dbd connection Shouldn't this be a method on the server representation,

Re: [Discuss] mod_lua and database connectivity

2013-01-03 Thread Brian McCallister
Supporting luasql would be a big bonus, though I understand if goal is to provide a quick and dirty api which is backed by mod_dbd http://www.keplerproject.org/luasql/manual.html -Brian On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:32 AM,

Re: [Discuss] mod_lua and database connectivity

2013-01-03 Thread zhiguo zhao
Maybe you need this: https://github.com/zhaozg/mod_luaex Example on http://kkhub.com 2013/1/4 Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org Supporting luasql would be a big bonus, though I understand if goal is to provide a quick and dirty api which is backed by mod_dbd

Re: [Discuss] mod_lua and database connectivity

2013-01-03 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 01/04/2013 12:57 AM, Brian McCallister wrote: ... Supporting luasql would be a big bonus, though I understand if goal is to provide a quick and dirty api which is backed by mod_dbd Quick and dirty makes it sound so...dirty. But yes, essentially, the purpose is to provide very basic database