I think I've finally figured out what's going wrong in my module but am unsure
what to do about it.
The module runs on apache 2.2.22 with mpm prefork. Occasionally I am seeing
corruption of the output bucket brigade, primarily the ring pointers
(link-next and link-prev) ending up with strange
On 12 Jun 2013, at 10:20, Sorin Manolache wrote:
If I understand correctly, the main thread belongs to your module, i.e. it is
not a concise pseudo-code of the request processing in apache's code.
The main thread is the (presumably single) thread of the prefork mpm process,
created (I
On 2013-06-12 11:48, Alex Bligh wrote:
On 12 Jun 2013, at 10:20, Sorin Manolache wrote:
If I understand correctly, the main thread belongs to your module, i.e. it is
not a concise pseudo-code of the request processing in apache's code.
The main thread is the (presumably single) thread of
Sorin,
Normally the output brigade is only written during the ap_rprintf/ap_fwrite
and the like.
OK, so in my case, I run with an SSL filter and the request timeout stuff which
also operates as a filter (let's ignore the latter for simplicity)
I think what you are saying is:
1. that the
On 2013-06-12 14:16, Alex Bligh wrote:
But that aside, is it safe to call apwrite() from one thread whilst there's a
read in the other?
I do not know for sure, but I suppose it is not safe if both the read
and the write operate on the same brigade.
I'm not calling ap_pass_brigade (at
Hi guys,
shouldn't Apache 2.2 contain the same change which went for 2.4?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1400962
Thanks,
Petr
2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv
* mod_proxy_wstunnel: Backport (copy) websocket tunnel proxy submodule
* skiplist: Add skiplist functionality
I'm a big +1 on Eric folding this into trunk!
re-looking at this, it would be nice if we could abstract
out the callback itself as simply some event, where
the callback and the baton itself is self-contained
enuff to define what the event is... eg register_anevent_callback :)
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv
* skiplist: Add skiplist functionality
There doesn't seem to be any user of the skiplist than
register_timed_callback, and there doesn't seem to be any user of
register_timed_callback besides
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Petr Sumbera petr.sumb...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi guys,
shouldn't Apache 2.2 contain the same change which went for 2.4?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1400962
In principal, we do not change defaults in a released branch.
This was
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
nd: why would you do that in a stable branch?
+ sf: Because it is only annoying and serves no purpose
anymore. If you + want, we can
Le 11/06/2013 09:41, jaillet...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jailletc36
Date: Tue Jun 11 07:41:40 2013
New Revision: 1491700
URL:http://svn.apache.org/r1491700
Log:
According to comment in 'magic_rsl_add' and to the way 'magic_rsl_printf'
manages its buffer, I think that this memory should be
Am 12.06.2013 21:15, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
I believe the change is outside of the scope which server authors should
entertain, and it is up to the user agent authors to make an intelligent
choice knowing the risks and lack of risks in their agent implementation
yes and no
in fact if
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Petr Sumbera petr.sumb...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi guys,
shouldn't Apache 2.2 contain the same change which went for 2.4?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1400962
In
Perhaps this time, we entertain a proper vote rather than a pair of
devs electing to change defaults on a whim. Stable branches are
RTC for a reason.
Huh? We had three devs voting for the backport. What more do you want?
FWIW I noticed in archive that sf was left off in the commit message
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:24:31 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, on Redhat systems in /etc/sysconfig/httpd put the line
OPENSSL_NO_DEFAULT_ZLIB=1 did disable it before httpd
offered a option, but IHMO any server software should
come with as much as secure defaults if they
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:27:18 +0200
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 05:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
In principal, we do not change defaults in a released branch.
That's not true. It doesn't happen very often but it
Am 12.06.2013 21:49, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:24:31 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, on Redhat systems in /etc/sysconfig/httpd put the line
OPENSSL_NO_DEFAULT_ZLIB=1 did disable it before httpd
offered a option, but IHMO any server software
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:08:00PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv
* skiplist: Add skiplist functionality
There doesn't seem to be any user of the skiplist than
register_timed_callback, and there
Am 12.06.2013 21:52, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:27:18 +0200
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
All web *browsers* that support compression are affected. Only non-
browser clients are not affected. Calling that far from all
stretches things a bit.
You would
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:24:31 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, on Redhat systems in /etc/sysconfig/httpd put the line
OPENSSL_NO_DEFAULT_ZLIB=1 did disable it before httpd
offered a option,
On 12 June 2013 20:49, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:24:31 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, on Redhat systems in /etc/sysconfig/httpd put the line
OPENSSL_NO_DEFAULT_ZLIB=1 did disable it before httpd
offered a option, but IHMO
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:57:22 -0400
Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:24:31 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, on Redhat systems in /etc/sysconfig/httpd put the
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:55:15 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:08:00PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote:
2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv
* skiplist: Add skiplist functionality
There doesn't
On Wednesday 12 June 2013, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
In fact, the patch's docs text is wrong on the face of it;
Enabling compression causes security issues in most setups (the
so called +CRIME attack)
This is true of specific setups where the user agent simultaneously
shares a
On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:24 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
My question is not whether that feature is useful, rather whether this
belongs in httpd, or is a better candidate for apr?
Either is fine, I guess. However, my plan is that the
eventopt stuff will eventually get
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:05:05 +0100
Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
On 12 June 2013 20:49, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:24:31 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, on Redhat systems in /etc/sysconfig/httpd put the line
28 matches
Mail list logo
