Sorry, I had no intention to send this offlist.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: nonportable-atomics configure.in setting
To: Daniel Lescohier daniel.lescoh...@cbsi.com
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:22 AM,
1 user tries to browse protected resource
2 user is redirected to form
3 user fills in and submits form
4 user is redirected to AuthFormLoginSuccessLocation and receives
encrypted session cookie (encrypted with key A)
5 encryption key changes from key A to key B
6 user tries to browse
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Daniel Lescohier
daniel.lescoh...@cbsi.com wrote:
I see this in configure.in:
AC_ARG_ENABLE(nonportable-atomics,
[ --enable-nonportable-atomics Use optimized atomic code which may
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
After r64861: native atomics are disabled (forcibly) on those CPUs,
whatever --enable-nonportable-atomics is.
Sorry, --enable-nonportable-atomics is still honored, I misread the code.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
After r64861: native atomics are disabled (forcibly) on those CPUs,
whatever --enable-nonportable-atomics is.
Sorry,
I saw those but figured since I was not using any AUTH_DECLARE I would be
fine. I'm now using
diff --git a/include/mod_auth.h b/include/mod_auth.h
index 9b9561e..8807a5c 100644
--- a/include/mod_auth.h
+++ b/include/mod_auth.h
@@ -134,6 +134,30 @@ APR_DECLARE_OPTIONAL_FN(void,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I had no intention to send this offlist.
Well, I really strayed here, I just realize now this is the wrong list.
Sorry again Daniel and httpd folks, I'll now restate all that to the apr
list :)
Adding APR dev list:
IMO, httpd should expect APR to do the right thing. If APR
isn't doing that, then it's an APR bug and needs to be fixed/
addressed within APR.
All this implies that the atomics code in APR needs a serious
review and update.
We should also look into leveraging what we can
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Also, IMO, the default should be non-portable
atomics.
Yes: that is the purpose of APR: having a portable API on top of
non-portable implementations for each platform.
So it sounds like I should go ahead and work on an implementation of the
time caching using apr_atomic_cas32 and apr_atomic_dec32. This won't be an
issue for RHEL/CentOS/etc., because they're using old versions of httpd.
We can put something in the release notes saying that for 32-bit i486,
i586,
+1
On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Daniel Lescohier daniel.lescoh...@cbsi.com wrote:
So it sounds like I should go ahead and work on an implementation of the time
caching using apr_atomic_cas32 and apr_atomic_dec32. This won't be an issue
for RHEL/CentOS/etc., because they're using old
While researching mod_remoteip to work on httpd bugs 55635 and 55637,
I noticed a few unrelated blemishes in mod_remoteip.c.
These include some redundant code and comment typos.
The attached patch against httpd trunk should address these.
Thanks,
Mike Rumph
Index:
12 matches
Mail list logo
