Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.9 as GA

2014-03-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1: Fed18, CentOS6, OSX 10.9.2 (Xcode 5.1) On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.9 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.9 as GA

2014-03-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.03.2014 17:49, schrieb Jim Jagielski: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.9 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.9 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will

rewriterule

2014-03-14 Thread Ligade, Shailesh [USA]
Hello, I want to log client certificate chain, when there is ssl verification failure. So I have a rule RewriteCond %{SSL:SSL_CLIENT_VERIFY} !=SUCCESS RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /cgi-bin/printenv.pl [QSA,PT,L] But it doesn’t work. If change the rule to success, it works, but I need to log the chain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.9 as GA

2014-03-14 Thread Rainer Jung
On 13.03.2014 17:49, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.9 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.9 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.9 as GA

2014-03-14 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2014 19:14 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.9 as GA On 13.03.2014 17:49, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache

Re: Rich is looking for a substitute httpd talk for Denver

2014-03-14 Thread Rich Bowen
So, looks like we'll just leave that one slot empty in the httpd track, or fill it with something off-topic. Unless ... last ditch effort here - if anyone would like to do a what's coming in 2.6 kind of discussion, that could be a way to fill the space. But I'm reluctant to just fill the