On 04/25/2014 02:57 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Hi Jan,
sorry for the late.
No problem :).
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi again,
the patch has been here for some time already. I hesitate to commit it to
trunk without any review, because it changes the
Hi Yann,
thanks for the patch, seems to be working. But I only checked that the
request hasn’t lost its query-string. I don’t know if it is save, but
so far I’ve no further problems.
Regards Chriss
Hi Chriss,
you should create new bug(zilla) entries for these two (even if the
second
On 27 Apr 2014, at 7:14 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Could you try the following patch?
Index: modules/cache/mod_cache.c
===
--- modules/cache/mod_cache.c(revision 1589129)
+++ modules/cache/mod_cache.c
j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Apr 28 10:55:17 2014
New Revision: 1590597
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1590597
Log:
Fold in mod_spdy source
NOTE: THIS IS THE INITIAL LOAD OF THE SRC AS-IS AND AS DONATED
I understand that this is the initial load, but I am little bit
Any reason to NOT include
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1332643
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1487772
in 2.4??
On 28 Apr 2014, at 22:50, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Any reason to NOT include
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1332643
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1487772
in 2.4??
I don't think
I have not looked at the patches or ALPN in detail, but I think the
important question is how hard it would be to change this for (or add) ALPN
support. If Chrome is planning to remove NPN support, it does not seem very
useful to add the feature to HTTPD.
- Y
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM,
AFAIK OpenSSL does not support NPN out of the box either and obe would have to
apply patches to the openssl-src in order to get NPN support. In OpenSSL 1.0.2
ALPN support has been added, though.
I know it is easy to say and probably takes a lot of effort to implement, but
wouldn't it be better
