+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Hello,
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available
in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default
(CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS, openSUSE), and more of them
are going to use systemd by
Am 14.09.2014 um 13:21 schrieb Martynas Bendorius:
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available in
trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default
(CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS,
openSUSE),
Reindl, thank you for your input :) mod_journald was just an addition to
this letter, because it's available on RHEL7/CentOS7 and many other
distros, the main thing in question in mod_systemd, which is really
useful, and distributions supporting systemd already provide mod_systemd
by default,
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 12 Sep 2014, at 4:57 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Makes sense, however ap_core_output_filter() and
ssl_io_filter_output() *know* that their buffered_bb does not contain
such bucket (exclusively filled by
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
How about to require that the caller of ap_filter_setaside_brigade just hands
over a non NULL bucket_brigade as
buffered_bb (so changing apr_bucket_brigade ** to apr_bucket_brigade *) and
that it should handle
On 09/14/2014 01:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.09.2014 um 13:21 schrieb Martynas Bendorius:
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available in
trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default (CentOS/RHEL
7,
