On 17.06.15 18:56 , Eric Covener wrote:
> Sounds right. The "authn" in the name is shorthand for authentication
> (vs authorization). It seems possible to shoehorn other data into this
> cache though, but it's not clear to me what it adds using socache
> directly.
The problem is that I don't know
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek
wrote:
> I was looking into caching of user credentials, but I think I might be
> missing something.
>
> The call ap_authn_cache_store seems to store user credentials which will
> help, if you have
> a directive like 'Require valid-user', bu
I was looking into caching of user credentials, but I think I might be missing
something.
The call ap_authn_cache_store seems to store user credentials which will help,
if you have
a directive like 'Require valid-user', but it won't help for directives like
'Require group admin'.
Am I right?
Hello,
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_authn_socache.html
There are 2 things I want to mention:
1) cacheing is not a word. It should be replaced with caching on the entire page
2) AuthnCacheSOCache Directive: If not set, your platform's default will be
used.
There's no indication wha
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> 1. connection, setup for base server and defaults
> 2. client hello arrives
> 3. ALPN callback is invoked by openssl
> 4. ALPN protocol is chosen, this triggers the server answer
> 5. SNI callback is invoked by openssl and sets up vhost info
Seems like a good idea to not place the ALPN patches into 2.4 - yet.
During my tests, I discovered that the order of my vhost definitions affected
the certificate chosen - when ALPN was in play. After some analysis, the
following seems to occur. This is to make the mod_ssl people here aware and
I have updated the bugzilla ticket since this was committed in
r1684900 and a backport to 2.4.x is already proposed.
Regards,
Yann.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Mario Brandt wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> please add a unified diff file to the bug and add the keyword PatchAvailable
>
>
> Cheers
> Mar
Hi Nick,
please add a unified diff file to the bug and add the keyword PatchAvailable
Cheers
Mario
On 11 June 2015 at 13:31, Nick Gearls wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anybody have a look at this trivial bug waiting for months?
> The bug is obvious and the fix is a one line change.
>
> Thanks a lot
