Re: Apache 2.4 adoption revisited -- now 16.4% of Apache sites

2016-02-22 Thread Mike Rumph
On 2/22/2016 3:40 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: 2016-02-21 15:55 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano >: Would it be worth to add a small banner on each documentation page for 2.2 stating something like: Patch attached with a very high level idea of what I would like t

Re: Apache 2.4 adoption revisited -- now 16.4% of Apache sites

2016-02-22 Thread Luca Toscano
2016-02-21 15:55 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > > > Would it be worth to add a small banner on each documentation page for 2.2 > stating something like: > Patch attached with a very high level idea of what I would like to do. I have modified the "retired" banner for 2.2 to suggest the readers a migrat

Re: svn commit: r1729495 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/aaa/ modules/arch/win32/ modules/core/ modules/examples/ modules/filters/ modules/http2/ modules/loggers/ modules/lua/ modul

2016-02-22 Thread Marion & Christophe JAILLET
Le 22/02/2016 22:21, Rainer Jung a écrit : Am 15.02.2016 um 07:28 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: Le 10/02/2016 00:09, rj...@apache.org a écrit : Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/server/mpm/event/event.c URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/server/mpm/event/event.c?rev

Re: svn commit: r1729495 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/aaa/ modules/arch/win32/ modules/core/ modules/examples/ modules/filters/ modules/http2/ modules/loggers/ modules/lua/ modul

2016-02-22 Thread William A Rowe Jr
This looks busted anyways, the author broke the atomic behavior of log messages :( Fix the underlying bug. Each AP# string should have exactly one string value, for later internationalization. There is no way, without the APLOGNO, that this second message can be translated. Cheers, Bill On

Re: svn commit: r1729495 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ modules/aaa/ modules/arch/win32/ modules/core/ modules/examples/ modules/filters/ modules/http2/ modules/loggers/ modules/lua/ modul

2016-02-22 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 15.02.2016 um 07:28 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: Le 10/02/2016 00:09, rj...@apache.org a écrit : Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/server/mpm/event/event.c URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/server/mpm/event/event.c?rev=1729495&r1=1729494&r2=1729495&view=diff @@ -

Re: Apache 2.4 adoption revisited -- now 16.4% of Apache sites

2016-02-22 Thread Kurt Newman
If it’s any consolation, cPanel changed our default web server from 2.2 to 2.4 on May 2015. We still see a large percentage of customers using 2.2 though. > On Feb 15, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> I stumbled on this link t

Re: svn commit: r1731594 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod: mod_proxy_balancer.xml mod_proxy_wstunnel.xml

2016-02-22 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Jim! 2016-02-22 14:19 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski : > Aww... I like using 'automagically'... but maybe that's > too old school :) > /me feels terribly sorry for it, I do like configuration magic too :( There was a comment about it (among the other things) and I thought to be as strict as possibl

Re: svn commit: r1731594 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/mod: mod_proxy_balancer.xml mod_proxy_wstunnel.xml

2016-02-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Aww... I like using 'automagically'... but maybe that's too old school :) > On Feb 22, 2016, at 2:18 AM, elu...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: elukey > Date: Mon Feb 22 07:18:19 2016 > New Revision: 1731594 > > == > --- h