Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:37:40
-0400):
>[x] +0: meh
mod_http2.so will not build 'out of the box' on Windows, because
mod_http2.dsp is missing
# Begin Source File
SOURCE=./h2_ngn_shed.c
# End Source File
This leads to build errors like:
1>h2_mplx.obj : error
Thx.
Trunk and 2.4.x now both build without issue.
Norm
On 21/03/2016 8:00 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Applied in 1735928.
Am 17.03.2016 um 22:45 schrieb NormW :
G/M,
A recent addition to trunk mod_proxy_http2 needs an additional export from
hghttp2 lib, thus:
Index: modules/http2/NWGNUmod_h
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.19 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72 hr
Yeah... it disappeared and then returned but svn had it as deleted
and all kinds of weird stuff.
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Mon Mar 21 17:19:53 2016
> New Revision: 1736070
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/v
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Mon Mar 21 17:19:53 2016
> New Revision: 1736070
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1736070&view=rev
> Log:
> ??
>
> Removed:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/ssl/mod_ssl_openssl.h
>
>
Something weird is happening in you
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:55:52
> -0400):
> >UPDATE: I plan to T&R at ~1pm Eastern.
>
> Will mod_fcgid be part of 2.4.19?
>
> Jan
>
>
mod_fcgid continues to be a separately-released component.
I just noti
Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:55:52
-0400):
>UPDATE: I plan to T&R at ~1pm Eastern.
Will mod_fcgid be part of 2.4.19?
Jan
UPDATE: I plan to T&R at ~1pm Eastern.
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> NOTE: I will be tagging and rolling today...
>
> I expect no significant changes from r1735948.
>
> Hopefully, we can get 2.4.20 out soonish and include mod_proxy_http2
> and mod_proxy_hcheck.
Thx. I'll take a deeper look post 2.4.19 (this week)
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 4:36 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2016 11:43 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 10:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kaluža
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >>
> >> I just saw this disappear from 2.4.x; if you know what the cause is, let
> >> me know. Otherwise I'll figure it out "soo
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> I just saw this disappear from 2.4.x; if you know what the cause is, let
>> me know. Otherwise I'll figure it out "soon".
>
>
> My svn knowledge fails me...
>
> This listing of when
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Mon Mar 21 12:25:48 2016
> New Revision: 1735960
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1735960&view=rev
> Log:
> Vote, promote.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATU
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I just saw this disappear from 2.4.x; if you know what the cause is, let
> me know. Otherwise I'll figure it out "soon".
>
My svn knowledge fails me...
This listing of when I added the file says (*Current path doesn't exist
after revision
I just saw this disappear from 2.4.x; if you know what the cause is, let me
know. Otherwise I'll figure it out "soon".
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
> I thought I had run the perl script against all files there...
> ...never trust a perl script from someone else.
"make update-log-tags" works like a charm :)
NOTE: I will be tagging and rolling today...
I expect no significant changes from r1735948.
Hopefully, we can get 2.4.20 out soonish and include mod_proxy_http2
and mod_proxy_hcheck.
Thanks, Yann. Updated.
I thought I had run the perl script against all files there...
...never trust a perl script from someone else.
> Am 21.03.2016 um 11:24 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, wrote:
>>
>> + Backport version for 2.4.x of patch:
>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
>> From: Stefan Eissing
>> Sent: Montag, 21. März 2016 09:48
>>
>> I encountered this once on a new image where /etc/hosts listed first
>> localhost ::1
Mine is listing 127.0.0.1 first, so it may depend on the network stack
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, wrote:
>
> + Backport version for 2.4.x of patch:
> https://www.eissing.org/proxy_http2_2.4v3.patch
> +1: icing, ylavic
> updated patch after review by cjaillet, merged 1735668,1735748 from
> trunk
> + updated patch with APLOGNOs
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de]
> Sent: Montag, 21. März 2016 09:48
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Test framework vs IPv6
>
> Yann,
>
> I encountered this once on a new image where /etc/hosts listed first
> localhost ::1
>
>
Applied in 1735928.
> Am 17.03.2016 um 22:45 schrieb NormW :
>
> G/M,
> A recent addition to trunk mod_proxy_http2 needs an additional export from
> hghttp2 lib, thus:
>
>> Index: modules/http2/NWGNUmod_http2
>> ===
>> --- modules/
Yann,
I encountered this once on a new image where /etc/hosts listed first
localhost ::1
Like you, I found that there seems to be no quick fix for this and
edited /etc/hosts...
I think your listen patch should be applied.
-Stefan
> Am 20.03.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On my machi
22 matches
Mail list logo
