Re: Status for 2.4.20

2016-03-29 Thread William A Rowe Jr
FULL STOP. The next person to demand the last word of this thread will be iptables deleted from existence at a.o. Can you all appreciate that ~2000 people have to read all of your pissing contests? This is simply not acceptable. Be done with it.

Re: Status for 2.4.20

2016-03-29 Thread Noel Butler
your short memory returns again, thank you, as that terminates any and all prior agreements we had about (not) responding to each other and your diatribe, the flood gates have now opened. But as for this post, so it seems I did, I probably stopped reading half way, my care factor isnt all

Re: core.c error

2016-03-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The fix is to add parens as needed to make the intent clear. > > Why parens? strcmp(cmd->path, "/") != 0 looks better than >

Re: core.c error

2016-03-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The fix is to add parens as needed to make the intent clear. Why parens? strcmp(cmd->path, "/") != 0 looks better than !(strcmp(cmd->path, "/") == 0), IMHO.

Re: core.c error

2016-03-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
The fix is to add parens as needed to make the intent clear. > On Mar 29, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Looks like clang had been updated and a new error warning: >> >> core.c:2410:14:

Re: core.c error

2016-03-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Looks like clang had been updated and a new error warning: > > core.c:2410:14: error: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of > this comparison > [-Werror,-Wlogical-not-parentheses] > else if

core.c error

2016-03-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
Looks like clang had been updated and a new error warning: core.c:2410:14: error: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison [-Werror,-Wlogical-not-parentheses] else if (!strcmp(cmd->path, "/") == 0) ^ ~~ core.c:2410:14:

Re: svn commit: r1736510 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-03-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:23 PM, wrote: > > Author: trawick > > Date: Thu Mar 24 21:23:00 2016 > > New Revision: 1736510 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1736510=rev > > Log: > >

Re: svn commit: r1736510 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-03-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:23 PM, wrote: > Author: trawick > Date: Thu Mar 24 21:23:00 2016 > New Revision: 1736510 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1736510=rev > Log: > HTTP_BAD_GATEWAY -> MODSSL_ERROR_BAD_GATEWAY > > Modified: >

Re: Status for 2.4.20

2016-03-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.03.2016 um 09:37 schrieb Noel Butler: On 29/03/2016 01:06, William A Rowe Jr wrote: @Everyone on this thread - keep it civil. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Noel Butler > wrote: On 25/03/2016 19:52, Graham Leggett wrote:

Re: Cleanup when server is stopped vs reconfigured

2016-03-29 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Tony Abo wrote: > > Is there a way to run some cleanup code in a module when the server is being > stopped, but not being restarted? Or, can a cleanup handler in a loaded > module determine whether the server is being shut down or restarted?

Re: Status for 2.4.20

2016-03-29 Thread Noel Butler
On 29/03/2016 01:06, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > @Everyone on this thread - keep it civil. > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > On 25/03/2016 19:52, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 23 Mar 2016, at 1:58 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > >

Re: Status for 2.4.20

2016-03-29 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1 Thanks! > Am 28.03.2016 um 17:06 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > @Everyone on this thread - keep it civil. > >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Noel Butler wrote: >>> On 25/03/2016 19:52, Graham Leggett wrote: >>> On 23 Mar 2016, at 1:58 PM,