Re: Topic for discussion... 2.4.26
Apparently unscathed / unattempted. https://twitter.com/zh4ck/status/843036999569346560 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Eric Covenerwrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Should we start thinking about having a release this month? >> >>> On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> Would be nice, I think, to start discussion on a T of 2.4.26 and >>> to open the doors to who wants to RM. Note, that if *nobody* >>> offers to RM, I will... and no matter what, I offer to help >>> whoever wishes to RM. >> > > +1 but keep in mind pwn2own has that mid-month (3-15/3-17) event w/ > the big Apache-on-Ubuntu bounty. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r1787525 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_autoindex.xml modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLETwrote: > So I think that there is a small display artifact and that there is 1 extra > space when the "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" format is used. > > I've not tested, so I don't know if it makes a real difference. > > Also the comment should be changed in something like /* Length="22-Feb-1998 > 23:42 " or Length="1975-04-07 01:23 ". See 'datetime_format' definition */ Thanks, comment updated in r1787553. I left the whitespace as-is, since this retains how both versions have been appearing. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r1787525 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_autoindex.xml modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c
Le 18/03/2017 à 03:51, cove...@apache.org a écrit : Author: covener Date: Sat Mar 18 02:51:02 2017 New Revision: 1787525 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1787525=rev Log: Add IndexOptions UseOldDateFormat *) mod_autoindex: Add IndexOptions UseOldDateFormat to allow the date format from 2.2 in the Last Modified column. PR60846. PR34014 / r903052 changed date format for autoindex [...] @@ -1844,8 +1851,9 @@ static void output_directories(struct en apr_time_exp_t ts; apr_time_exp_lt(, ar[x]->lm); apr_strftime(time_str, , sizeof(time_str), -"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M ", ); -ap_rputs(time_str, r); +datetime_format, +); +ap_rvputs(r, time_str, " ", NULL); } else { /*Length="1975-04-07 01:23 " (see 4 lines above) */ The lines below have been changed this way in r903052: -/*Length="22-Feb-1998 23:42 " (see 4 lines above) */ +/*Length="1975-04-07 01:23 " (see 4 lines above) */ ap_rputs(" ", r); So I think that there is a small display artifact and that there is 1 extra space when the "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" format is used. I've not tested, so I don't know if it makes a real difference. Also the comment should be changed in something like /* Length="22-Feb-1998 23:42 " or Length="1975-04-07 01:23 ". See 'datetime_format' definition */ CJ