Which reminds me... How about that cool proxy protocol patch? Anyone want to
give it a whirl? ;-)
--
Daniel Ruggeri
Original Message
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: April 27, 2017 9:55:39 AM CDT
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: backport proposals
Yeah...
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:44 AM, wrote:
> +/* A request that has passed through .htaccess has no business
> + * landing up here.
> + */
> +if (ap_request_tainted(r, AP_TAINT_HTACCESS)) {
> +return DECLINED;
> +}
> +
If AllowOverride is enabled for
On 04/27/2017 07:15 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
So, the proposal could have been written as:
*) mod_proxy_hcheck: Honor checks in Vhosts w/o hanging svn merge -c
1784203,1784205,1784227,1784228,1784275,1785871,1786009,1789387
^/httpd/httpd/trunk . +1: jim, ylavic
Wouldn't that be easier?
+1,
Yeah... sometimes it is easier to create a "combined" patchfile
which shows the collected changes, for ease of reviewing, but, as
you say, it can get out of sync as other patches are backported,
esp if the proposed backport is in STATUS for a semi-extended
period of time.
> On Apr 27, 2017, at
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> Take this as an observation about proposals in general, nothing wrong with
> this one in particular:
>
> *) mod_proxy_hcheck: Honor checks in Vhosts w/o hanging
> trunk patch:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> Take this as an observation about proposals in general, nothing wrong with
> this one in particular:
>
> *) mod_proxy_hcheck: Honor checks in Vhosts w/o hanging
> trunk patch:
Take this as an observation about proposals in general, nothing wrong with this
one in particular:
*) mod_proxy_hcheck: Honor checks in Vhosts w/o hanging
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1784203
http://svn.apache.org/r1784205
On 04/18/2017 08:38 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Evaluating whether I will attend ApacheCon, the most specific reason
> would be hackathon time. Or productive BoF sessions.
>
> Who all is planning to spend some time hacking at ACNA '17? Ideas for
> projects or BoF topics?
I will be there if I
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
> Shouldn't we call apr_brigade_cleanup in any case after ap_pass_brigade?
We should yes, I first did this since we don't want possible r->pool's
buckets staying in bb.
I wanted to cleaning up
Shouldn't we call apr_brigade_cleanup in any case after ap_pass_brigade?
Regards
Rüdiger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. April 2017 11:47
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1707087 -
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
>> Am 26.04.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
>> :
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de]
11 matches
Mail list logo