Re: svn commit: r1856416 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/
Le 27/03/2019 à 16:05, drugg...@apache.org a écrit : Author: druggeri Date: Wed Mar 27 15:05:09 2019 New Revision: 1856416 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1856416=rev Log: Get ready to tag httpd 2.4.39 Modified: [...] Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/convenience.map URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/convenience.map?rev=1856416=1856415=1856416=diff == --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/convenience.map (original) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/convenience.map Wed Mar 27 15:05:09 2019 @@ -478,8 +478,6 @@ redirectmod/mod_alias.html#redirect redirectmatch mod/mod_alias.html#redirectmatch redirectpermanent mod/mod_alias.html#redirectpermanent redirecttemp mod/mod_alias.html#redirecttemp -redisconnpoolttl mod/mod_socache_redis.html#redisconnpoolttl -redistimeout mod/mod_socache_redis.html#redistimeout Why? mod_socache_redis.xml was part of http://home.apache.org/~jim/patches/socache_redisv2.patch but is not in r1855817. Missing svn add after patching the 2.4 branch? This can be fixed after 2.4.39 release. It is not that important (for me) if missing in the tarball. CJ
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:28 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 3/27/19 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > Since there is now a release tarball can we have a week to test? Generally votes don't go too far past the minimum of 72 hours if there are sufficient binding +1's and no indications of regression. But the feedback is still valuable even if it doesn't necessarily hold up a release.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:09:52AM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.39: > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1, 100% on the tests here on Fedora 29, thanks for RMing and good to go! Regards, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
On 3/27/19 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ Since there is now a release tarball can we have a week to test? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional
[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.39: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: e66d6bfea42254e64d3b5009f49ecc486ac46de2 *httpd-2.4.39.tar.gz sha256: 8b95fe249f3a6c50aad3ca125eef3e02d619116cde242e1bc3c266b7b5c37c30 *httpd-2.4.39.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri
