Re: svn commit: r1864735 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http2/h2_stream.c
Thx for spotting and fixing it Eric.
The comma has been automagically removed by 'make update-log-msg-tags'
Will have a look to see if i tweak the script in order to avoid that in
the future.
CJ
Le 08/08/2019 à 23:23, cove...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: covener
Date: Thu Aug 8 21:23:29 2019
New Revision: 1864735
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864735&view=rev
Log:
followup to r1864734
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http2/h2_stream.c
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http2/h2_stream.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http2/h2_stream.c?rev=1864735&r1=1864734&r2=1864735&view=diff
==
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http2/h2_stream.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http2/h2_stream.c Thu Aug 8 21:23:29
2019
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ apr_status_t h2_stream_end_headers(h2_st
apr_table_do(table_check_val_len, &ctx, stream->request->headers,
NULL);
if (ctx.failed_key) {
ap_log_cerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_INFO, 0, stream->session->c,
- H2_STRM_LOG(APLOGNO(10190) stream,"Request header exceeds
"
+ H2_STRM_LOG(APLOGNO(10190), stream,"Request header
exceeds "
"LimitRequestFieldSize: %.*s"),
(int)H2MIN(strlen(ctx.failed_key), 80),
ctx.failed_key);
set_error_response(stream, HTTP_REQUEST_HEADER_FIELDS_TOO_LARGE);
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:43:46 +0200): >Are the reported APLOGNO all going to be solved in .41: > >mod_proxy mod_http2 mod_ssl In mod_md.c I se no APLOGNO() without argument anymore, so they must be gone. For instance, 2 out of three directly after line 600 were without argument in .40 and generated the warning. Now they have an argument: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md.c?diff_format=h&view=markup#l600 FWIW: +1 -- Jan
Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs
On 8/8/19 4:47 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Yessir. I'll send a notification when ready. > -- Regarding the usual text : Announcement2.4.txt Seems a little confusing to the average user that we may say this is the best version of httpd and it will need apr 1.5.x minimum and then says "features may require the 1.6.x version of both APR and APR-Util". Well at the same time the apr project claims "recommended releases" are newer apr 1.7.0. Perhaps it would be more clear to just say we recommend that you use Apache Portable Runtime 1.7.0 as well as Apache Portable Runtime Utility 1.6.1 and that solves the version mystery. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40
> Can the backport I tested and suggested on May 13th 2019, about > mod_session_crypto be considered for this release? Or if it's too late > for me to ask again, for the next one? > I proposed it just now
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40
Le Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:51:07 -0500, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.40: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha1: 31bc6f87ac209010b8b364abc1c80dfaee53cc64 *httpd-2.4.40.tar.gz > sha256: > 451e6cf6caa09119900b74652266427f70050de5c51948acd4aaaf60d0d3cad0 > *httpd-2.4.40.tar.gz > Hi, Can the backport I tested and suggested on May 13th 2019, about mod_session_crypto be considered for this release? Or if it's too late for me to ask again, for the next one? email subject was : Subject: Re: [2.4.39] [mod_auth_form] [mod_session_crypto] Cookie management performance Cheers, Vincent Deffontaines (alternate email address : gry...@apache.org) -- Notre liberté repose sur ce que les autres ignorent de notre existence Alexandre Soljenitsyne
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
+1 Le 08/08/2019 à 15:09, Eric Covener a écrit : CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert. On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote: Author: covener Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 New Revision: 1864701 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev Log: no votes for APLOGNO commits. 99% sure but please reply Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff == --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: . documentation . non-Unix build . non-Unix, single-platform code +. routine APLOGNO() backports RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs
Yessir. I'll send a notification when ready. -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 8, 2019 11:54:18 AM CDT, Dennis Clarke wrote: >On 8/8/19 7:41 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >> As the subject says, I'd like to get on with our 2.4.new release now >> that we're good to go. Will kick things off in about 24 hours > >Tarballs will be in the usual places ?? > > > >-- >Dennis Clarke >RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC >UNIX and Linux spoken >GreyBeard and suspenders optional
Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs
On 8/8/19 7:41 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > As the subject says, I'd like to get on with our 2.4.new release now > that we're good to go. Will kick things off in about 24 hours Tarballs will be in the usual places ?? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:09:57AM -0400, Eric Covener wrote: > CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert. > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote: > > > > Author: covener > > Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 > > New Revision: 1864701 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev > > Log: > > no votes for APLOGNO commits. > > > > 99% sure but please reply +1
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Are the reported APLOGNO all going to be solved in .41: mod_proxy mod_http2 mod_ssl > Op 8 aug. 2019 om 15:09 heeft Eric Covener het volgende > geschreven: > > CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert. > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote: >> >> Author: covener >> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 >> New Revision: 1864701 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev >> Log: >> no votes for APLOGNO commits. >> >> 99% sure but please reply >> >> >> Modified: >>httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff >> == >> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 >> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: >> . documentation >> . non-Unix build >> . non-Unix, single-platform code >> +. routine APLOGNO() backports >> >> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: >> >> >> > > > -- > Eric Covener > cove...@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
+1 -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 8, 2019 8:09:57 AM CDT, Eric Covener wrote: >CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert. > >On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote: >> >> Author: covener >> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 >> New Revision: 1864701 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev >> Log: >> no votes for APLOGNO commits. >> >> 99% sure but please reply >> >> >> Modified: >> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> URL: >http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff >> >== >> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 >> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: >> . documentation >> . non-Unix build >> . non-Unix, single-platform code >> +. routine APLOGNO() backports >> >> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: >> >> >> > > >-- >Eric Covener >cove...@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert. On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote: > > Author: covener > Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 > New Revision: 1864701 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev > Log: > no votes for APLOGNO commits. > > 99% sure but please reply > > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff > == > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 > @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: > . documentation > . non-Unix build > . non-Unix, single-platform code > +. routine APLOGNO() backports > > RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: > > > -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
[NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs
Hi, all; As the subject says, I'd like to get on with our 2.4.new release now that we're good to go. Will kick things off in about 24 hours -- Daniel Ruggeri
