> Is everybody OK with sending e-mail notifications for CI failures for
> trunk to this list?
+1
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Le 23/04/2020 à 12:20, Joe Orton a écrit :
In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke because of some change in
the Ubuntu repo). So I think we're r
Hi all,
triggered by the new mod_systemd I drafted a patch to enhance the
monitoring data it provides during the monitor hook run.
Currently it publishes important data, like idle and busy slots and
total request count, but also not so useful info like requests/second
and bytes/second as a l
Build Update for apache/httpd
-
Build: #649
Status: Errored
Duration: 13 mins and 22 secs
Commit: c92568b (2.4.x)
Author: Joe Orton
Message: Merge r1876869 from trunk:
systemd dependencies are only needed by mod_systemd.
They should currently not be needed by
Build Update for apache/httpd
-
Build: #648
Status: Passed
Duration: 21 mins and 40 secs
Commit: 4a2ab53 (2.4.x)
Author: Jim Jagielski
Message: Merge r1876540 from trunk:
PR64295 cannot override default Virtualhost's mod_reqtimeout
of course only body=n can wo
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:39 PM Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
> > Am 23.04.2020 um 12:23 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/23/20 12:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> >> In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
> >> Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI cau
> Am 23.04.2020 um 12:23 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
>
>
>
> On 4/23/20 12:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
>> Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
>> false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke
On 4/23/20 12:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
> Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
> false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke because of some change in
> the Ubuntu repo). So I think we
In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke because of some change in
the Ubuntu repo). So I think we're reaching the point where signal is
dominatin
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 08:56:23AM -, rj...@apache.org wrote:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1876870&view=rev
> Log:
> systemd dependencies are only needed by mod_systemd.
> They should currently not be needed by httpd directly
> or any other binary. So no need to add them to
> HTTPD_L
10 matches
Mail list logo
