Re: svn commit: r1896002 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/test: Makefile.in modules/proxy/ modules/proxy/__init__.py modules/proxy/conftest.py modules/proxy/env.py modules/proxy/test_01_http.py modules/proxy/t

On 12/15/21 5:39 PM, ic...@apache.org wrote: > Author: icing > Date: Wed Dec 15 16:39:38 2021 > New Revision: 1896002 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1896002&view=rev > Log: > *) test: added first mod_proxy tests in test/modules/proxy that > check some variations on forward, re

Re: Free MFA hardware tokens for your project

All, On 12/14/21 14:25, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: I work with the Developer Best Practices Working Group of the Linux Foundation's Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) > > [snip] > We'd like to give your project *free* MFA hardware tokens from Google and GitHub, for use by your maintainers.

Re: travis setup for 2.4.x

On 12/14/21 12:57 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >> Am 14.12.2021 um 12:53 schrieb Joe Orton : >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:34:24AM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote: >>> How is the relation between the .travis.yml in trunk and 2.4.x? We have >>> checks for jobs in trunk with >>> >>> - if: *cond

Re: svn commit: r1895955 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h include/http_protocol.h modules/http/http_request.c modules/http2/h2_request.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:54 AM Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 2:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:26 PM Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> > >> This is a little confusing. It looks from the comment and code like the > >> change is restricting the request tar

intent to tag

FYI: I intend to tag a 2.4.52 release candidate tomorrow, Thursday 16.12. The vote on this candidate is meant to conclude on Sunday evening and will, if successful, make a release on Monday, 20.12. Should we not reach a positive vote on Sunday, we will shift the next attempt to the first week in