Re: CVE-2022-22728: libapreq2: libapreq2 multipart form parse memory corruption

2023-01-02 Thread Joe Schaefer
2.17 is a dud.  What’s in trunk works fine though.

Joe Schaefer, Ph.D

+1 (954) 253-3732
SunStar Systems, Inc.
Orion - The Enterprise Jamstack Wiki


From: enge...@gsuite.cloud.apache.org  on 
behalf of Apache Security Team 
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2023 7:30:43 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org 
Cc: Apache Security Team 
Subject: Re: CVE-2022-22728: libapreq2: libapreq2 multipart form parse memory 
corruption

Hi,

I noticed there was some confusion online as to whether this issue is
fixed in 2.17 (https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/08/26/4).

Unless anyone objects I'll amend the CVE text to make it explicit that
users are recommended to update to 2.17 or later.

Luckily with the new CVE format the version ranges are more explicit,
so this kind of confusion is less likely to occur again.


Kind regards,

Arnout

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 4:09 PM Joe Orton  wrote:
>
> Severity: important
>
> Description:
>
> A flaw in libapreq2 versions 2.16 and earlier could cause a buffer overflow 
> while processing multipart form uploads.  A remote attacker could send a 
> request causing a process crash which could lead to a denial of service 
> attack.
>


Re: CVE-2022-22728: libapreq2: libapreq2 multipart form parse memory corruption

2023-01-02 Thread Apache Security Team
Hi,

I noticed there was some confusion online as to whether this issue is
fixed in 2.17 (https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/08/26/4).

Unless anyone objects I'll amend the CVE text to make it explicit that
users are recommended to update to 2.17 or later.

Luckily with the new CVE format the version ranges are more explicit,
so this kind of confusion is less likely to occur again.


Kind regards,

Arnout

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 4:09 PM Joe Orton  wrote:
>
> Severity: important
>
> Description:
>
> A flaw in libapreq2 versions 2.16 and earlier could cause a buffer overflow 
> while processing multipart form uploads.  A remote attacker could send a 
> request causing a process crash which could lead to a denial of service 
> attack.
>