Hi All,
Community over Code Asia 2023 (formerly ApacheCon Asia) will be held
in person this year in Beijing [1].
The CFP will end on Tuesday, Jun 6th, 2023 8:00 AM (Beijing time - UTC +8).
For details could be found on the website [1].
Note that for those that can't be present, a pre-recorded
On 2023-05-08 16:18, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Graham,
On 5/8/23 05:29, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write
repository from Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write
> [x]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage
> the features of Github (for now Actions and PR).
> [ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git, but I don't
> want to work with Github and I will only work with
> what gitbox.apache.org offers.
> [ ]:
Graham,
On 5/8/23 05:29, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from
Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
via
Hi,
The right syntax is ProxyPass / balancer://qacluster/ the other one
gives something like:
"(scheme 'balancer'). If you are using a DSO version of mod_proxy".
Does it make sense to try to valid those ProxPass a bit better?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:29:04AM +0100, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
> This is a vote of no confidence in our own projects.
If the ASF at large was confident in SVN as a technology then our current
reality would look quite different. The Subversion project never managed
to grow its developer
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 4:29 AM Graham Leggett via dev
wrote:
> On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>...
> > [X]: Leave everything as is.
>
> I would rather see proper SVN integration with Github. This is a vote of
> no confidence in our own projects.
>
What do you mean by
On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via Git at
>
I might suggest another day or two because of the weekend and because it is
so high-impact. Maybe an extra post to private@ in case some PMC members
aren't tracking dev@ very closely.
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 1:42 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > This
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via Git at
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
