Hi Devs and fellow list lurkers,
I finally took the time to give this SNI business a try.
I compiled the latest branch for the SVN with Kasper's patch on Windoze.
After a hurdle
with OpenSSL 098i that Tom Donovan was kind enough to help me jump over,
I've got
2.2.11-dev with SNI working on
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
Thanks,
Paul
-? tested on Windows XP built both VS9 and VS6
While we are at it;
If mod_mem_cache is no longer going to be used, needs to be removed
from makefile.win
Gregg
Paul Querna wrote:
Gregg
L. Smith wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha
are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev
!= VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_WINDOWS);
+ap_sys_privileges_handlers(1);
return OK;
}
Nick Kew wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Am I missing something?
[Mon Dec 08 13:21:17 2008] [crit] Server MUST relinquish startup
privileges before accepting connections. Please ensure mod_unixd or
other system
+1 vanilla on 2000, XP and Vista
I have details but cannot get that mail through at the moment so I'll
break it into pieces, if that's ok.
Gregg
Hello Devs,
With the talk of removing pcre I've been dreading this day.
VC6
H:\build\httpd-2.3.2-alpha\server\util_pcre.c(48) : fatal error C1083:
Cannot open include file: 'pcre.h': No such file or directory
I've thrown a prebuilt at it and it doesn't like that either.
LINK : fatal error
Yes, hopefully someone will since I'm not there yet and I've tasted 2.3
on two prior occasions and would love to again..
For the record, the pcre and deftables projects has been removed from
the Apache workspace, but their cousin seem to still exist in the
makefile, so command line builds
Just 2 cents.
I do like the toggle switch in this patch.
Now that OpenSSL defaults to SNI enabled, I like it even more!
One less thing to remember at compile, one build instead of two separate
being best of both worlds,
and the user (me) having to knowingly switch it on, not just on cause it
So does this mean we can expect to see 2.2.12 soon?
Regards,
Gregg
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.04.2009 08:48, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been
asked to plop directly in
Hello,
Did somebody forget the Win32 binaries or are they just not ready yet?
They do not exist at
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/
therefore they do not exist anywhere. Pointed out by a person trying to
download them in a post at Apache Lounge.
Gregg
Jim Jagielski wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+/-1
[+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32,
and binaries will follow in the morning.
non-binding +9/10 on Windows. Please see PR 47659 for the last 1/10.
This is only a build process failure due to a
approach, but I'm very green. I'm looking at it now, that is much
cleaner. I just learned a little more about make files, thanks.
I will give it a whirl here a little later and see how it goes or
doesn't go.
Gregg
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
make run) instead of going out to the makefile now? not that it matters
much.
Gregg
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+/-1
[+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32,
and binaries
Hi Bill and Chris,
Question, is this going to work with APR 1.3 on Windows? I see this
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=787561
but when I look at what I was given by Tom Donovan he seemed to have to
deal with APR 1.3 as a #if seperate entity #endif, nasty yes but it
works. My
that will be very happy now that the ASF has taken it over.
Gregg
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Faulting application httpd.exe, version 2.2.13.0, faulting module
libapr-1.dll, version 1.3.8.0, fault address 0x793d.
Gregg, your Dr Watson or windbg fault backtrace please
Hi Devs,
A vote of mine does not count but I think I am leaning on a -1 here for
a couple reasons.
1. in ap_release.h you have placed a restriction on just this sort of thing;
* Product tokens should be short and to the point -- use of them for
* advertizing or other non-essential
From the Windows Peanut Gallery,
[ ] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-GA
Builds great (good Win32 build instructions), module loads quietly,
works wonderfully with existing config and shaves an average of two
seconds off a simple and straightforward chew on this
Headline: Policy kills and up-and-coming star
Problems I see in no particular order;
1. Two subproject votes called simultaneously totaling 3 concurrent open
votes (fcgid, ftp, ServerTokens OFF), and a one let's get this ready to
vote (httpd 2.3.3). That's a lot to chew on, especially with
Hi Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I mentioned on another thread; the builds are very closely related,
so it's
pretty simple to check them out side by side or put them into the same
server.
Most defiantly when it comes to building them and I now understand
Hello,
*) mod_proxy_scgi: Backport from trunk. [André Malo]
just in case you didn't know, there is no mod_proxy_scgi
makefile/project additions for Windows in SVN branch/tarballs
[0] Release httpd-2.2.14 as GA
Peace,
Gregg
Hello,
CHANGES states;
*) mod_proxy_scgi: Backport from trunk. [André Malo]
There are no Windows build files for this module. To hopefully soften
the grief a little I may have a head start. I think I've covered all the
bases, sorry I forgot to donate this over the weekend.
Regards.
I did this a couple weeks ago, it's close, but not perfect. Best on
white/light background.
On 11/27/2011 8:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:49, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 27.11.2011 10:50, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
docs/icons/apache_pb2* contain the
No, I looked it up after, it's one of the Swiss fonts from MS Office,
couldn't grab back the mail.
On 11/27/2011 4:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Gregg,
In 28.11.2011 01:12, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I did this a couple weeks ago, it's close, but not perfect. Best on
white/light background
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_scgi.c
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_scgi.c?rev=1203859r1=1203858r2=1203859view=diff
==
---
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- modules docs
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_watchdog
- mod_heartbeat
- mod_heartmonitor
- mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
I vote these off the Windows boat, mod_watchdog crashes the
On 12/3/2011 2:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
- mod_socache_shmcb
These are required for SSL AFIAK
On 12/3/2011 7:54 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/3/2011 2:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
On 12/4/2011 1:02 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 03 December 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/3/2011 1:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
On 12/5/2011 12:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/05/2011 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/5/2011 1:22 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Like said on another thread, give me couple of days and I'll fix the
issue.
Well, as soon as I compile httpd-2.4 on windows which might be
tricky cause
build
On 12/5/2011 5:15 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Fixed in the trunk and 2.4.x
Willing to retest?
Regards
I see the change which was what I had suggested in the beginning,
granted I did not have a real good technical reason other than it then
works :) I have not built trunk recently but making the
On 12/27/2011 10:40 AM, Steffen wrote:
Gregg reported it also:
I've also found AcceptFilter https none to be problematic. First time
you hit a site via https it usually comes up with a blank white
nothing. Hitting reload and it comes up proper.
That I did, fishing to see if others were
0On 1/2/2012 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
We should try to get at least the rewrite/proxy issue resolved, first.
About the
Honesty,
never tries with these on ... especially sendfile ... slows us wintards
outbound down bigtime.
On 1/2/2012 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/1/2012 12:30 PM, Steffen wrote:
Also IMHO blocking GA:
- SSL on windows not usable
- Hanging logging workers
Does disabling the
Since I have been the most vocal about this
watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on windows ... I should chime in.
I can tell someone what each do (as far as I have seen). There are,
minimal docvs on all but watchdog (which is required for a couple) ...
but ... look at my emails in the past ... am
My vote ... Stefan, wherever it fits (depends on whom I speak to) ,
these are showstoppers. But, it can be said these are one OS specific
... which usually does not stop the press AFAIK. I can say however .. as
a small time distributor ... this will be noted as the problems yet
remaining on
On 1/12/2012 10:11 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.01.2012 11:24, Steffen wrote:
We have at least 4 hard bugs in 2.3.16. Known for a long time, and
no need to exposure more for these.
Fine a GA, with a big note that it is not ready for Windows and
advising to run 2.2.21 as proven stable.
So
On 1/11/2012 5:52 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 1/11/2012 6:26 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Also, in relation to the windows stuff, I think Jim's suggestion is
most appropriate in the absence of more windows users to test.
If all we need is testing and some logging, I'd be happy to assist. If
someone
On 1/12/2012 5:29 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 1/12/2012 5:50 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Either apachehaus.com or apachelounge.com have 2.3.16 binaries
available for Windows.
The problem is with the directive;
AcceptFilter httpd none
That is the only non-stardard config option.
Greg
On 12/28/2011 6:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
Author: sf
Date: Wed Dec 28 14:54:49 2011
New Revision: 1225199
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1225199view=rev
Log:
Check during configtest that the directories for error logs exist
Testing under Windows is welcome
PR: 29941
I think
On 1/13/2012 11:30 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/28/2011 6:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
Author: sf
Date: Wed Dec 28 14:54:49 2011
New Revision: 1225199
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1225199view=rev
Log:
Check during configtest that the directories for error logs exist
Testing
On 1/17/2012 11:25 AM, Steffen wrote:
It is line with our reports. Thanks, and this confirms again there is some
broken serious.
For me a showstopper 2.4, tons of win users going to deal with this.
Work around is to use 2.2.21 SSL-only and minimal config in front of 2.4.
Another possible
On 1/17/2012 11:56 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I'd suggest that patches/apply_to_x.y.z/ is a clumsy notation. It seems
more efficient to set these up as patches/CVE--/ with individual
files for actively (or semi-actively) maintained versions. If there is
one patch which applies to 2.2.n
On 1/17/2012 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/17/2012 2:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
* Are we committed to providing the -deps for 2.4's lifetime, or would
we doc it with some weasel language?
I'm +1 for dropping -deps, but you knew that ;-)
* Does anyone care if we're not committed
On 1/20/2012 10:36 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 7:07 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a friendly reminder... If reports have been submitted
to BUGZ, could you list them in this thread please?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476
Suspects identified, proceeding
On 1/20/2012 10:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 7:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will note, for the record, that despite my request, it does
not look as if anyone has added the Windows issue(s) as either
showstoppers in STATUS or created a BUGZ issue to enable us
to track it.
On 1/20/2012 10:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 7:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will note, for the record, that despite my request, it does
not look as if anyone has added the Windows issue(s) as either
showstoppers in STATUS or created a BUGZ issue to enable us
to track it.
On 1/20/2012 11:30 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 1:03 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 1/20/2012 10:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I hope to spend time this weekend on the win32 build. I would
like very much to dump .dsp/.dsw prior to your tag. That means
some sort of .mak
On 1/20/2012 12:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2012 2:06 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Due to the fact that right now, you have to convert to VC9 first, then convert
to VC10, I
have some insight here that I am sure you do as well.
Good point...
If you have done this, you may remember
Bill,
In PR 50309, the submitted patch moved the apr_pool_cleanup_register() call
from procmgr_child_init to the tail end of procmgr_post_config in
fcgid_pm_win.c prior to returning APR_SUCCESS. You have simply removed it from
procmgr_child_init in r1234169.
Hello,
I did not get far
inet_pton.c
multicast.c
Generating Code...
Compiling...
socket_util.c
E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21)
: error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; different type
modifiers
./include\apr_network_io.h(362) : see
Sorry bout that,
I always try first with VS6 SP6 SDK 2003R2
I'm more curious why it is trying to build the 'unix' file in the first
place since there is a Win32 alternative
Gregg
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello,
I did not get far
Generating Code...
socket_util.c
E
Hello again,
While were at it.
I dropped in APR/Util 1.3.9 and had a go at it.
I'll guess this error is because of it but in case it isn't;
Configuration: mod_ldap - Win32
Release
Compiling resources...
Compiling...
util_ldap.c
these are by default
not included in the out-of-tree builds can we just copy the dlls and
drop the pdbs from the copy command?
Thanks
Gregg
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello again,
While were at it.
I dropped in APR/Util 1.3.9 and had a go at it.
Compiling
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Sorry bout that,
I always try first with VS6 SP6 SDK 2003R2
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Generating Code...
socket_util.c
E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21)
: error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition
It's 03:00 UTC 11/16 but the vote failed anyway.
Some things that have not been addressed.
Basically, SSL doesn't work or there's new directives not documented yet.
mod_ssl: r835046 + OpenSSL 0.9.8L + working config from 2.2.14
PKCS #1 SHA-1 With RSA Encryption 2048bit certs (Real, not
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Or just use the 2.2 modules with 2.4.
It was just my recent findings with 2.3.3-alpha that this will not work.
If the APR 1.4(?) that was in httpd-2.3.3-alpha-deps.tar.gz is anything
close to what will be shipped with 2.4 then no, this may not work. I had
to rebuild all
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:17 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Nov 23 23:17:51 2009
New Revision: 883540
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=883540view=rev
There will likely be other issues to discuss about this, but to start with:
* you need an
' : undeclared identifier
Sorry for the lack of clarity again.
Gregg
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Gregg L. Smith li...@glewis.com
wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ok, let me express it this way.
in util_mutex.c line 160 you've got this;
def-dir
Jeff Trawick wrote:
no, even I could understand
I fixed it by hardcoding logs when DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR isn't defined.
This works for me at least.
(mpm_default.h won't be found on Unix without build changes, and we
want to minimize affinity with any particular MPM anyway.)
I find that
[+1] Release httpd-2.3.4 as Alpha
Win32 Release build fails at mod_ldap
Windows XP
VC++ 6 SDK 2003 R2
PCRE 8.0
LUA 5.1.4
---Configuration: mod_ldap - Win32 Release
Compiling resources...
Compiling...
util_ldap.c
E:\build\httpd-2.3.x-dev\modules\ldap\util_ldap.c(2660) :
Guenter,
I looked at your commit
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=885281
Yes, it allows VC++ to continue on building without error. It is exactly
what I had done to get passed the problem. Thank you.
Regards,
Gregg
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Gregg,
Gregg L. Smith schrieb
Original Message ---
Finally, I have yet to see any feedback on the pcre mandatory
dependency issue. Comments?
Personally, I thought your Monopoly metaphor was quite on target.
libz, openssl, lua = batteries not included
apr, apu, pcre = drive train not included.
And
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I may be wrong but as an outsider looking in, I see you wanting to stop
maintaining/including the gear box and are instead spending the time on adding
more optional gadgets to choose from (some of the third party modules you've
taken over). In the end, I'd prefer
818dd957edfb2d4747887029dd786332c1bfa7b0 apache_1.3.42.tar.gz
builds, starts and serves content on win32 ... about as far as I've got
though since my old configs are long gone.
I was going to chime in on the prior thread leading to this release and
just never found the time to, so will now.
non-binding ditto on good enough for Alpha with light testing on Win32.
Gregg
Paul Querna wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.5-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
Shouldn't this be a B?
What's one more compiler warning among friends :-)
while your burning cycles on svn someday ... mind adding all the new
kewl modules into httpd.conf?
I cannot seem to get libserf to build ... but I'll worry about that
later down the road.
Gregg
wr...@apache.org
Ouch,
E:\build\httpd-2.3.x-dev\support\rotatelogs.c(307) : warning C4013:
'snprintf' undefined; assuming extern returning int
Linking...
rotatelogs.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _snprintf
Release/rotatelogs.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
should it be
Coming up on 80 hours I'm +1
Tested on 32 bit versions of Windows 2k, XP, Vista
Hi Jorge,
I brought this up quite some time ago, which is why I have been moving
away from AVG since I was basically ignored here :-) That and AVG's many
false positives. What is worse is, that XML bomb wont hurt anything
anymore, and it can be gotten around AVG as well just by adding a
On Windows?
My suggestion originally was to remove it only from the Win32 zip.
Gregg
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/12/2010 12:06 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
You would rather we not warn you of the vulnerability, when you compile against
your existing expat?
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.03.2010 14:52, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the
I agree there should be a release fixing (at least) CVE-2009-3555 (ssl
reneg). My tests were positive, but more eyes are very welcome.
Rainer,
XP SP2
Hi Stefan,
WRT Windows,
E:\build\httpd-2.2.x-dev\modules\filters\mod_reqtimeout.c(154) : error
C2065: 'core_module' : undeclared identifier
E:\build\httpd-2.2.x-dev\modules\filters\mod_reqtimeout.c(154) : error
C2223: left of '-module_index' must point to struct/union
Regards,
Gregg
Hello,
Late to the party but I thought I'd mention that I have seen this as
well, with a difference however.
I've seen it on two different servers, both using SNI hosts. It happens
to me a lot when logging into joomla administrator in Firefox. Since I
use no other browser I cannot comment on is
Hi Stefan,
This seems to break trunk on Windows, prior revision builds fine.
Configuration: httpd - Win32 Release
Compiling resources...
Compiling...
main.c
E:\build\httpd-2.3.x-wrk\server\main.c(48) : warning C4273:
'core_module' : inconsistent dll
but is a temporary workaround
to allow the server to be compiled on Windows. Of course, this is your
guy's call.
Regards,
Gregg
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi Gregg,
On Monday 07 June 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
This seems to break trunk on Windows, prior revision builds fine.
I am not really familiar
. Please place
* extern functions and global data in another appropriate module.
*
* Most significant main() global data can be found in http_config.c
*/
Cheers,
Gregg
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi Gregg,
On Tuesday 08 June 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Sorry to say this still will not build
Hi Stefan,
Sorry I have not gotten back on this till now. Life jumped in the way
and then I had forgotten about it.
Your fixed patch builds with 0 errors 0 warnings, module loads and time
will tell how it works.
Thanks,
Gregg
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi Stefan,
WRT Windows,
E:\build
non-binding Win32 XP/Vista VC6 VC9
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+/- 1
[+1] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
APR 1.4.2
APU 1.3.9
APU 1.4.0-dev
Every module loads this time (lbmethods did not in 2.3.5 IIRC)
SSLCACertificateFile no longer errors for me
I'd
Hello,
Currently the windows make file in trunk causes nmake on VC6/SDK 2003 R2
to fail on Line 511, VC9 does not seem to have a problem with it. I have
not tried on 10 and do not have 7 8.
The problem on 6 is if nmake/ide does not see the comment (#) as the
first character of the line it
Hello devs,
Can mod_status.h be moved to include/ from modules/generators
It would make it easier to drop fcgid into the modules directory and build in
tree. I cannot see that it would hurt anything, other than getting used to it
being moved before making changes.
Regards
Gregg
of by 2.3.6.
Speaking of 2.3.6, it would be nice to see it soonish too? Looking at
changes there are not a lot of them but the segfault is a bear, and it
brings downs Apache. It's been six months as well, seems a perfect
reason for a release.
TIA,
Gregg
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello devs
looking at. The fix has
been well tested by people at the Apache Lounge and in some cases I'd imagine
still in use today.
Regards,
Gregg
Original Message ---
On 01.07.2010 04:23, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Speaking of 2.3.6, it would be nice to see it soonish too? Looking
Peanut Gallery vote:
[+1] Release httpd-2.2.16
XP SP3, VC6 SDK 2003 R2 ... ~24 hours live w/ no problems seen
XP SP3/Vista SP1, VC9 ... no problems noticed w/ light testing
Server 2008 R2 (x64), SDK 7 ... no problems noticed w/ light testing
Cheers Beers
Gregg
Hello Rainer,
I am +1 for this, as a matter of fact I lobbied for this 10 months ago.
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-devm=125421199606305w=2
If it is going to be done however, please do it completely. Attached is
the rest of what is needed. [mod_proxy_scgi_project.patch]
mod_proxy_scgi.dsp
I see this statement I made to be incorrect now since you added this today.
Regards,
Gregg
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
installwinconf.awk which was overlooked when adding this module to trunk.
A loud resounding Amen to Guenter from the Windows balcony.
I have reservations however.
1. I have a patch that let's me build trunk with the PCRE 5.0 from 2.2,
but I do not want to stay at PCRE 5.0 cause you have to have something
newer to link mod_security 2.5.12+ against, so I have to build
Hi Stefan,
Not in my book it shouldn't go away. It is the only place I can get good
debug info on perl scripts ... OK, not the only place but it is easiest
place to find the needed info. Since perl is not 100% dead and gone,
please keep it. It seems fine as-is, as I've been using it 10 years
Hello Gabriel,
I've run into this on xp, vista 2008. Somehow source folders get put in read
only mode. Make them writable again and it will build. On Win7 if that means
putting it in Documents, so be it.
As far as errors in IDE, you sure they are not warnings? 2 warnings per project
is what
Jeff,
In the next day or two while doing this, could please have a look at PR 48949.
TIA,
Gregg
Original Message ---
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Gabriel Petrovay
gabipetro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Maybe this gives you some hints. I have looked a little in the code
Hello,
Post r1032073, trunk has not built in Windows as suggested in the log
for r1032073.
I see util_expr.c needs to go and util_expr_*.c/h need to be added to
the build. What baffles me is the .y .l files. AFIAK, I have never
built the lexical target that kicks in the custom build step
Original Message ---
Pre-test tarballs of httpd-2.3.9-alpha are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/httpd-2.3.9-alpha/
Please try 'em out and I'll make them official test tarballs...
-1, does not build on Windows.
Libhttpd - Cannot find util_expr.c
No
Original Message ---
Pre-test tarballs of httpd-2.3.9-alpha are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/httpd-2.3.9-alpha/
Please try 'em out and I'll make them official test tarballs...
-1, does not build on Windows.
Libhttpd - Cannot find util_expr.c
No
, where would you suggest putting a
#ifdef WIN32
#define YY_NO_UNISTD_H
#endif
util_expr_private.h?
Thanks,
Gregg
Hoping this webmail doesn't send twice again.
Original Message ---
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Original Message
---
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
In util_expr_scan.c line 612 there is an #ifndef YY_NO_UNISTD_H
around a include to unistd.h, where would you suggest putting a
#ifdef WIN32
#define YY_NO_UNISTD_H
#endif
util_expr_private.h?
Yes, exactly. Maybe it should
'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__stdcall *)' to 'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__cdecl *)'
Regards,
Gregg
Original Message ---
Stefan,
Am 25.11.2010 08:14, schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Here we go, cannot test beyond libhttp
warning aren't a big deal
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 25 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Much better, results seem to be the same as Guenter's;
\server\util_expr_eval.c(350) : error C2440: ':' : cannot convert
from 'int (__stdcall *)(ap_expr_lookup_parms *)' to
'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__cdecl *)'
\server
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone opposed if I declare 2.3.9 DOA and TR 2.3.10?
No objections from the noisy guy in the peanut gallery.
Gregg
!
Gregg
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/29/2010 1:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/22/2010 4:59 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello,
Post r1032073, trunk has not built in Windows as suggested in the log for
r1032073.
I see util_expr.c needs to go and util_expr_*.c/h need to be added
I'd say I am. Even though it is not a high traffic server, the last time I got
one of those errors was October 8th. looking further back, it is always
following one specific custom error doc that oops, didn't exist till now cause
I forgot to generate a new on when I changed the look of the
Hi,
Seems to me what users have the most problem groking is the duplicate of
the main host in httpd.conf and it needing to be the first vhost. In the
docs it is highlighted as Main server goes away. In reality, this is
not always the case, sometimes people just get the main host and nothing
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
