would like to donate the code to the ASF, then
incubator.apache.org would be a good link to check out
first.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who
;
}
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else.
On Mar 4, 2005, at 5:20 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
worker_score in scoreboard.h needs a pid_t field. The worker MPM (and
probably some other Unix threaded MPMs) has a perhaps-unexpected way
of handling child processes which are terminating gracefully -- it
allows new child processes to take over the
On Mar 7, 2005, at 1:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 07:22 AM 3/6/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
I assume we are in agreement that the current AAA discussion shouldn't
hold up moving to 2.2 either.
Absolutely it does. Either 2.1-dev has made implementing this
worse (my essentially workable
...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else.
be a ridiculous
performance hit. -1. -- justin
I agree. We should keep it enabled.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary
I'm not keen on any API adjustments to 1.3
If it's a global setting, then I'd be more apt to
+1 its inclusion.
sendfile exists or how to
implement or emulate it makes the most sense...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else.
,
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 10:47 AM 3/29/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Since we're extending core_dir_config, we should document the
change in core_dir_config
Since the bit breaks binary compatibility, I'll toss my -1 into
the ring. It's non-technical though, so not a veto.
I wish
that.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else.
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Mar 29, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Since we're extending core_dir_config, we should document the
change in core_dir_config
Should I elaborate more in my core_dir_config from what I already have?
I mean in ap_mmn.h
Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
So can I have a quick vote before beta to rename our program to
'httpd.exe' on Windows, matching our Unix builds?
+1
+1
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL
Admittedly, there are times when having multiple conf files
and conf directories makes things much easier. Other
time, more difficult. But that is a SysAdmin decision.
We should keep with one-true config file for defaults.
On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Rici Lake wrote:
default: modules which would be used in virtually any useful httpd
server
most: modules which would be regularly used in a non-minimal httpd
server
all: modules which are useful and stable
no: modules which are deprecated, experimental, or examples
On Apr 9, 2005, at 3:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Apr 9 00:32:42 2005
New Revision: 160663
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160663
Log:
Add r-args to uri-query if the original r-uri
did not contain query string. This fixes #34266.
Hold on a sec... This is
On Apr 9, 2005, at 6:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Apr 9 03:12:01 2005
New Revision: 160675
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160675
Log:
Add canon_handler for load balancer so that we have
query string passed to remote.
Beat me to it :) I should really
On Apr 9, 2005, at 6:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+if (strncasecmp(url, balancer:, 9) == 0) {
+url += 9;
+scheme = balancer;
+}
+else {
+return DECLINED;
+}
+
Hold on a sec... I need to test this, but by the time this
is called, haven't we rewritten the
Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:21:42PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Mon Apr 25 10:21:40 2005
@@ -95,6 +95,11 @@
identify exactly what the proposed changes are! ]
[ please
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else.
I'm +1 for branching 2.2-alpha... However, there are 2 outstanding
show-stoppers. Do we expect these to be addressed before the branch.
I think so, especially if they require API changes
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, May 2, 2005 3:33 PM -0400 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought the whole idea about having a 2.1 dev version was to avoid
monkeying around with the API and the problems when we were doing
1.3 and 2.0. Once we branch, it is possible
, trunk is 2.1 anyway, so what does a branch provide?
I would say it's a perception advantage mostly.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read
. Will branching 2.1 help that? Maybe the
large refactoring place should be branch instead?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone
Paul Querna wrote:
I think mixing Listen and Protocol has the potential of
confusing things more than solving problems (ala Listen and
Port used to)... What is the exact problem this is trying to fix?
--
===
Jim
,
mod_ftp is likely to enter incubation (already rec'd positive votes by
both HTTPD PMC and Incubator PMC).
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
There 10 types of people: those who
Shouldn't set_allow_header be static?
and commit.
+1
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
I've run into this with some broken browsers. Basically, they
require a non-null SessionID in the SSL transaction. If, for whatever
reason, we disable the external SSL Session Cache, these
browsers reports errors when connecting to the SSL vhost.
This adds a new argument to SSLSessionCache which
On Jul 5, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've run into this with some broken browsers. Basically, they
require a non-null SessionID in the SSL transaction. If, for whatever
reason, we disable the external SSL Session Cache, these
browsers reports errors when
+char *len_end;
+c-len = ap_strtol(content_length, *len_end, 10);
-if (c-len 0) {
-ap_kill_timeout(r);
-return ap_proxyerror(r, HTTP_BAD_GATEWAY, ap_pstrcat(r-pool,
- Invalid Content-Length from remote server,
-
On Jul 6, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+char *len_end;
+c-len = ap_strtol(content_length, *len_end, 10);
-if (c-len 0) {
-ap_kill_timeout(r);
-return ap_proxyerror(r, HTTP_BAD_GATEWAY, ap_pstrcat(r-pool
On Jul 6, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:45:21AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
...
+else {
+char *len_end;
+errno = 0;
+c-len = ap_strtol(content_length, len_end, 10);
...
+if (errno ||
:)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
in output).
But if Roy says it's invalid, then we need to do what's right :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:09 PM 7/7/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
This was, iirc, to handle cases where a strtol could possibly set it
to NULL; someone, can't recall who, seemed to remember one implementation
which did that, so we just figured to-hell-with-it and add a safety
check
Now that Covalent has released it's ERS 3.0 distribution, mod_ftp is now
officially offered for donation/incubation/graduation to the ASF.
mod_ftp (previously Covalent FTP) is an Apache 2.0 Protocol Module which
implements FTP (RFCs 959, 1123, 2228, 2389), including such features
as FTP over
On Jul 7, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
Is there anything left for the community to work on? Or rather, do
you
think there is enough to do to attract a few (new) developers?
Yes, on both counts :)
This is a code donation, using well-established ASF procedures,
in the interests of having that codebase become part of the ASF
HTTP Server Project, either bundled in with httpd or via
a subproject.
No idea what you mean by abandoned code nor support...
I would suggest you look into the
their strtol implementation does.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
On Jul 8, 2005, at 10:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[22 hours - ping]
Votes please? 2/3 of our users use 1.3, do you?
Jim reminded me we don't ap_strtol everywhere, so the NULL check
I guess remains a good idea, as would a (len_end == content_length)
test which I will add before
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
+1
On Jul 7, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I volunteer as Champion.
I therefore Call A Vote on whether we should support mod_ftp for
inclusion into the Incubator and if we should accept mod_ftp upon
graduation from the Incubator.
Now that vacation and other offline activities
Final Tally:
+1 (binding):
Jim Jagielski
Sander Striker
Roy T. Fielding
Rich Bowen
Paul Querna
Geoffrey Young
Brian Pane
Bill Stoddard
Justin Erenkrantz
William Rowe
Graham Leggett
Jeff Trawick
+1 (non-binding):
Colm MacCárthaigh
Mladen
+1
On Jul 20, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Two very small patches against 1.3.
First one, make ab default to the highest SSL version available:
Index: src/support/ab.c
===
--- src/support/ab.c(revision 125243)
+++
On Aug 8, 2005, at 12:37 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Still looking for a vote on this fix to core for 1.3, preventing
modules from seeing an invalid C-L + T-E combination from the
client per RFC 2616. This does not apply to proxy (as implemented
now) but may affect other handlers as I
I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't
exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during
auth check)... since the module is experimental, can I assume CTR ?
Paul Querna wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't
exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during
auth check)... since the module is experimental, can I assume CTR ?
+1
Bill Stoddard wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:36 PM 8/8/2005, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't
exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during
auth check)... since
On Aug 9, 2005, at 1:55 AM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I can't believe you guys are still debating the merits of RTC over CTR
after all this time. RTC killed the momentum in this project a long
time
ago.
The RTC experiment was tried and has failed. Can we please
go back to the way things were,
On Aug 9, 2005, at 11:24 AM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Version control is your friend,
use it.
It is a shame that despite the advantages of svn over cvs for
tags/branches/etc, we are hardly using them effectively.
I must have missed it while away on vacation, but what is
the criteria on what gets in 2.1.x and what gets in 2.3.x.
Does this mean that for stuff to get in 2.2, it needs
to go into 2.3.x (trunk) then get proposed for backport
into 2.1/2.2?
I've never been all that happy with the current setup in having
load balance methods be so hard coded into the proxy module. Adding
another method requires too many changes.
So I've refactored those sections to allow for additional
lb methods to be added via simple submodules.
Prelim Patch is
Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I must have missed it while away on vacation, but what is
the criteria on what gets in 2.1.x and what gets in 2.3.x.
Does this mean that for stuff to get in 2.2, it needs
to go into 2.3.x (trunk) then get proposed for backport
into 2.1/2.2
.
:)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
On Aug 10, 2005, at 11:24 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've never been all that happy with the current setup in having
load balance methods be so hard coded into the proxy module. Adding
another method requires too many changes.
Right, but mod_proxy_balancer was not meant
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I don't know what you mean...
Well, IMO if there is a need for a new balancer
one should write a new balancer module.
Not balancer. Method.
Right now we have both API and functionality
inside mod_proxy that enables
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Did you even look at the patch? Your comments show
a supreme lack of understanding what it does.
Look Jim, I'm too old and too tired for such discussions.
If you think your patch will make the Earth a better place
to live on, you have my +1
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I wasn't. It was simply that we appeared to be discussing
2 different things.
Bet I'm older and more tired than you are ;)
Right. Ever visited Vukovar?
Got me there :)
Anyhow, I think that all balancer methods should be
threated
Now that mod_ftp is entering Incubation, if you are interested in
serving on the PPMC, please contact me directly.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith
On Aug 12, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:59:20PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:54:44AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Should this honor usecanonicalname? If so, could just use
ap_get_servername(r) in stead of r-hostname.
Now that mod_ftp is entering Incubation, if you are interested in
serving on the PPMC, please contact me directly.
Please recall that you will be required to submit an ASF iCLA
if you do not have one on file.
On Aug 15, 2005, at 4:10 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:29:54AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
The idea of canonicalising the name is sound, but munging them
into an
added :80 and an added ? is really ugly - these are not the kind
of URLs
that an end user would
to be
expired would have the same effect, but avoid serving stale content.
Would be interesting to profile that to determine how expensive those
stats could be...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
No, you're not unique. You'll see that 2.1 behaves somewhat different
than 2.0, when I was trying to come up with a more logical and
expected (Ha! :) ) behavior...
On Aug 18, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Brian Akins wrote:
We have servers that listen on a ports other than 80 which our load
balancers
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch
from
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean and then rebuild?
I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
and as expected... I'm
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:50:24AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
This is what add_lbmethods does...
Did you do a complete make diskclean
Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
at ALL in httpd-test... Guess we should strip out the whole shebang
since there was never a test that it ever worked... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:17:45AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases
at ALL in httpd-test...
A you've blown my sarcasm inhibitor now cap'n, I can't help it...
Gee, really? Would that be why nobody seems
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform... seems to work fine under Linux and OS X.
Windows
This is what add_lbmethods does...
It adds the method, but remember, the widows don't have fork,
so probably the data from parent
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've confirmed that without that hack, the server works fine
and as expected... I'm not sure, but I would almost
bet that it was due not all required *.o's being
rebuilt, and the hook in mod_proxy not being called
when you tested.
Can
On Aug 19, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Is it a scope issue because find_best_bytraffic is defined
as static...? Hmmm. I need to look into that.
Perhaps the problem is because on windows the config is
run twice.
It is on Unix as well.
Also seems
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf-lbmethods-nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods hook is never called.
Off the top of my head I can't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the cleanups! I just wanted to get something functional
in there.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is weird... Can you Email me your config file? No need
to send it to the list.
Any lbmethod is failing and the conf-lbmethods-nelts is 0.
The add_lbmethods
On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The hook gets called in post_config, but not in create_config.
Of course if you move it to the post_config the config will
not work, because the array is still uninitialized.
Think it's a hook related stuff and .dll
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
I said initially that you will have a problems with that patch.
Since you don't have a windows platform, someone else might
test that too. I'm on vacation
Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:51:48AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
I said initially that you will have a problems with that patch
On Aug 20, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Bundled with APR APR-Util 1.2.1:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.7/
Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.7 as beta.
Thanks,
-Paul
+1 on Sol8 and OS X 10.4.2
developers/users/admins
consider.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
On Aug 25, 2005, at 6:01 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Now that the ap_close_listeners() code is committed, implementing a
graceful stop is relatively trivial, I already have it working here
for
me. However there are some complicated nits which I thought I'd
solicit
feedback on.
One of
script sockets.
+1... The 2.1/2.2 docs should be updated to note that I think :)
You know, we'll be doing this enough that it really should be
an ap_call... ap_append_pid() ;)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Aug 25, 2005, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: colm
Date: Thu Aug 25 04:51:24 2005
New Revision: 240044
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=240044view=rev
Log:
Append the .PID to the ScriptSock filename. This change ensures
that multiple
running
, we will have 3 code bases
in RTC, and no real place to direct energy and vitality to.
Unless, of course, we go back to the concept of releasing early and
often.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
once the branch opens
towards GA - which'll happen once we issue a release from it. -- justin
+1 from me as well.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
if it is something
generic at all?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
stores the create_*_config
func pointer, not call it.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
BTW, when you are testing those patches on nix, do you use static or
dynamic modules?
Both. Plus, as I said, Bill Rowe also tested under Win32 and
got no errors at all.
Can you ask him to send me the binaries
it change the behavior you see?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I was wondering, if you add:
static const char *const aszSucc[] = { mod_proxy.c, NULL};
to ap_proxy_balancer_register_hook(), and then adjust the
following line to look like this:
proxy_hook_load_lbmethods(add_lbmethods
sees this... can you try the perl framework
test?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
Sith happens - Yoda
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
[Tue Sep 06 20:03:05 2005] [debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(41): proxy:
BALANCER: canonicalising URL //cluster//servlet-examples/
[Tue Sep 06 20:03:06 2005] [notice] child pid 3455 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
So, this is 2.1.7-beta from
Can anyone else recreate the core dumps that Mladen is seeing with
the balancer in 2.1.7-beta? The httpd-test perl framework has a simple
test for it.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
Hmmm My tests have all been http:
Proxy balancer://foo
BalancerMember http://www.google.com:80 loadfactor=1
ProxySet lbmethod=bytraffic
/Proxy
ProxyPass /bat/ balancer://foo/
Weird... Thanks for the feedback!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can anyone else recreate
Hold on a tic... it seems to be related to
whether or not it's within a Vhost...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hold on a tic... it seems to be related to
whether or not it's within a Vhost...
I think this is the solution as for each virtual host the create_server_config
is run for this virtual host again *after
901 - 1000 of 4499 matches
Mail list logo
