2013/4/30 Graham Leggett
> On 30 Apr 2013, at 12:03 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>
> > The only cost would a relatively small change to the Apache webservers,
> which is what my
> > suggestion consists of : adding a variable delay (say between 100 ms and
> 2000 ms) to any
> > 404 response.
>
> This
2014-02-06 ryo takatsuki :
> Hi,
>
> I have an improvement request to suggest but I would like to first provide
> some background to justify it, I apologise for the long email :).
>
> I'm actively using mod_proxy to forward PHP files requests to PHP-FPM. My
> current approach is to use a RewriteRul
https://github.com/hollow/mod_fastcgi_handler is quite easy to
configure, unfortunetly it is abandoned
2014-02-21 17:56 GMT+01:00 Антон Панков :
> Dear All.
>
> Please, explain what functionality now in trunk and what plans for
> mod_fcgid. I miss FastCGIExternalServer feature.
>
> The probl
see https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44262
The docs for 2.0 say about AllowOverride Options:
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#allowoverride)
"
Options Allow use of the directives controlling specific directory
features (Options and XBitHack).
"
and for 2.2 (http:/
2008/5/5 Jille Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello hackers!
>
> I was thinking of creating a more secure environment for running
> webscripts (mod_php in my case),
> I want to run php scripts as their owner.
>
> I tought of the following
Hello to all,
in https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44262 I was told
to ask about this issue on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Long talk short (i gues my last mail was to long to be comprehensible ;)
In apache 1.3/2.0 there was no selection of whitch options can or
can't be set in .htacess fi
2008/12/6 Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
>
>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
builds/runs (default config) on OSX 10.5.5
--
Michal Grzedzicki
think. The way it is
implemented is probably going to be different and may be the one I
am actually thinking of. I can't remember the name of it right now.
Maybe you mean MPM itk, which can change to different users for
different vhosts?
http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/
or peruser mpm
__
Lazy
Hi,
I'm trying to fix an issue in a custom mpm. It's called peruser. More
or less it's a prefork with pools of processes running on different
users.
Additional pool of processes called Multiplexers is accepting
connections and sending them to workers. Each worker pool has it's own
pair of sockets
2011/8/23 Stefan Fritsch :
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175
>
> I haven't looked into it so far. And I am not sure I will have time today.
>
it is sending HEAD requests with lots of ranges
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host:
Range:bytes=0-,5-1,5-2,5-3,.
the code in
ap_byterange_filte
2011/8/23 Lazy :
> 2011/8/23 Stefan Fritsch :
>> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175
>>
>> I haven't looked into it so far. And I am not sure I will have time today.
>>
>
> it is sending HEAD requests with lots of ranges
> HEAD / HTTP/1.1
2011/10/5 stefan novak :
> Hello!
> When you want to compile mod_fcgid als build in static module it fails with:
> modules/fcgid/.libs/libmod_fcgid.a(fcgid_mutex_unix.o): In function
> `fcgid_mutex_create':
> fcgid_mutex_unix.c:(.text+0x65): warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous,
> better use `
2011/10/5 stefan novak :
>> this is only a warning, are You sure httpd fails to build ?
>
> yes, httpd fails to build with this lines :(
> maybe another compile flag will help, i'm not sure...
i ran similar test on my system without problems (only this warning)
# ./configure --enable-fcgid
# make
Hi,
When some vhost's scripts exhaust all process slots available to it
(FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass),
next requests are waiting for over 60 seconds before issuing 503 error.
I came across this while modifying suexec to use cgroups to provide
better resource separation for use in our shared hosting
Hi All,
Currently graceful restart while using mod_fcgid just kill all
subprocesses, this is not sefe for applications and slows down
reloads.
John Lightsey provided a patch to make real graceful restarts on
mod_fcgid, now graceful part is separated as requested in the bug
report
https://issues.
2012/8/15 pqf :
> Hi, all
> I prefer the following solution, can anyone review it?
> procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() will be blocked until process manager create a new
> fcgid process, the worst case is someone else take the new created process
> before I do, and I have to post another spawn command to PM
2012/8/16 pqf :
> Hi, Michal
> My solution do "add availability to each class", which is the
> procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() call in each loop do.
> The sleep() call is intrudused for a stress test without warm up time, in
> this case, mod_fcgid will create more processes than a slow start one(each
> pr
sary to call procmgr_init_spawn_cmd()
from inside the for loop ?
>
> 2012-08-16
>
> pqf
>
> 发件人：Lazy
> 发送时间：2012-08-16 16:47
> 主题：Re: Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
> 收件人："
ther improvement would bo to make wait time
shorter for not overloaded classes to keep the penalty of denied spawn
as low as possible.
I plan to work on that later.
>
>
> Another question. Is it necessary to call procmgr_init_spawn_cmd() from
> inside the for loop ?
> I took a bri
2012/10/31 Eric Jacobs :
> On 10/31/2012 06:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> In general that is the proper form -- but this particular issue is
>> documented as a limitation:
>>
>> "Omitting this option should not be considered a security restriction,
>> since symlink testing is subject to race con
20 matches
Mail list logo
