Re: Failing http2.t in 2.4.36 [Was: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.36]

Adding another debug snippet at the end ... Am 13.10.2018 um 13:14 schrieb Rainer Jung: Hi Stefan, Am 10.10.2018 um 16:04 schrieb Stefan Eissing: Am 10.10.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Joe Orton : I believe that t/modules/http2.t is dying in this:     my $old_ref = \&{ 'AnyEvent:

Failing http2.t in 2.4.36 [Was: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.36]

Hi Stefan, Am 10.10.2018 um 16:04 schrieb Stefan Eissing: Am 10.10.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Joe Orton : I believe that t/modules/http2.t is dying in this: my $old_ref = \&{ 'AnyEvent::TLS::_get_session' }; *{ 'AnyEvent::TLS::_get_session' } = sub($$;$$) { piece of magic which I don't

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: No issue on my Ubuntu 18.04 VM. On what configuration are you running your tests, Rüdiger? macOS, just like Jim? Centos 7.5 64 Bit Regards Rüdiger The test fails for me as well for 2.4.36

Re: svn commit: r1842540 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c

Shouldn't we backport this? Or do you have doubts or maybe waiting for feedback? Regards, Rainer Am 01.10.2018 um 20:21 schrieb rpl...@apache.org: Author: rpluem Date: Mon Oct 1 18:21:18 2018 New Revision: 1842540 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1842540=rev Log: * Pickup the proxy

Minimum OpenSSL requirements for mod_md

Hi all, it seems our relatively new module mod_md needs at last OpenSSL 1.0.0 initial release. When building against latest 0.9.8zh I get linking errors due to missing symbols: modules/md/md_crypt.c: In function 'gen_rsa': modules/md/md_crypt.c:445:5: error: unknown type name 'EVP_PKEY_CTX';

Re: svn commit: r1841620 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/dev/verification.mdtext

Hi Luca, Am 21.09.2018 um 23:47 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi William, can you write in here the full command to use? Didn't find the -r flag that you mentioned :( The openssl commandline tool at least since 1.0.2 allows eg. openssl sha256 -r MYFILE which outputs the hash file in the same

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Am 21.09.2018 um 04:18 schrieb Dennis Clarke: +1 for release and thanks for RM. Not enough time right now for the usual detailed report, but so far looks good on Solaris 10 Sparc, SLES 11+12, RHEL 6+7. Thank you for getting to it before I did. I can ignore it now ;-) Not necessarily,

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [X] +1: It's not just good,

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

Am 17.09.2018 um 20:59 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;    I have been delayed executing the automation because the test suite seems to be hanging for me. This appears to be consistently during t/ssl/varlookup.t as that is the only process other than httpd running in this container during

Making proxy "busy" atomic and implement a busy limit

I am thinking about making the proxy worker busy count atomic. Currently we use an apr_size_t in shared memory and increment/decrement simply using the C ++/-- operators. My (somewhat outdated) experience from mod_jk is, that this is not necessarily atomic and might lead to missing updates,

Re: [Bug 62145] Fix crashes when apr_sockaddr_info_get fails

Am 07.09.2018 um 15:48 schrieb bugzi...@apache.org: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62145 moh.riza changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

Re: TLSv1.3 supprt for 2.4.x?

Am 03.09.2018 um 13:19 schrieb Joe Orton: AIUI the various bits of new API added for TLS/1.3 are not necessarily stable until there is a final OpenSSL 1.1.1 release, so maybe we should wait for that first? Last mentioned date for GA release of OpenSSL 1.1.1 was Tuesday 11th September. Not

Re: svn commit: r1837599 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Am 31.08.2018 um 20:30 schrieb Eric Covener: So the question is probably whether Eric thinks keeping the HTML output stable is more important than adding response duration info and proxy busyness info. I'm open to any decision. I didn't mean I had any issue with the HTML change. I think it's

Re: svn commit: r1837599 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Am 29.08.2018 um 05:45 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 28.08.2018 um 15:54 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:19 PM wrote: Log: Propose a few monitoring improvements. Those changes look fine (and great) to me, I wanted to +1 but I'm wondering if they really belong in 2.4.x since

Re: svn commit: r1837590 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c server/scoreboard.c

Am 31.08.2018 um 14:50 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 08/07/2018 12:48 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote: Author: rjung Date: Tue Aug 7 10:48:05 2018 New Revision: 1837590 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1837590=rev Log: mod_status: Add cumulated response duration time in milliseconds.

Re: svn commit: r1837599 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Am 28.08.2018 um 15:54 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:19 PM wrote: Log: Propose a few monitoring improvements. Those changes look fine (and great) to me, I wanted to +1 but I'm wondering if they really belong in 2.4.x since the output of mod_status is changed in a way that

Re: svn commit: r1837599 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Hi Yann, I will try to comment inline per patch. Yes, that's always a difficult decision. I think for the "?auto" part it should be easy: it uses a line based key-value format, so adding new keys should be fine for nearly any parser. For the HTML based output the decision is more difficult.

Fwd: [PHP-DEV] Re: apache2 buckets API masters needed

Hi all, I just noticed this mail on PHP internals (intern...@lists.php.net) and wanted to let the httpd dev list know in case anyone would be able to step up and lend them a hand. Thanks and regards, Rainer --- Begin Message --- Hi! > I need help from somebody who knows how to deal with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.34 as GA

Am 13.07.2018 um 15:03 schrieb Rainer Jung: e I expect prefork on Solaris still to observe timeouts during   proxy tests like reported for previous versions, but didn't test   it this time due to the long test runs when the problem happens.   I started these runs right now just to be able

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.34 as GA

Am 10.07.2018 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger

Build error in trunk for json modules (mod_md using md_json plus mod_log_json)

When trying to do a reallyall modules build I get an error during compilation of md_json. The compile command does not contain and "-I" flag for the jansson library. For mod_log_json, which gets build a bit earlier, the include path flag correctly contains jansson. Looking at modules.mk in

mod_cache: Broken Expires from back end and CacheStoreExpired

I have a situation where I have a caching Apache in front of a back end. The backend sends a response header "Expires: -1" and mod_cache unconditionally refuses to cache the response with the error "Broken expires header". RFC 7234 section 5.3 [1] contains the text:

Re: A proposal...

Am 24.04.2018 um 19:58 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: On 2018-04-24 09:22, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:08 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Eric Covener wrote: Yes, exactly correct. We have three "contracts" to

Re: A proposal...

Am 24.04.2018 um 13:19 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: On April 24, 2018 1:38:26 AM CDT, "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Ap

Re: Expanding httpd adoption internationally - POC

Am 24.04.2018 um 07:20 schrieb Marion et Christophe JAILLET: Le 24/04/2018 à 02:58, William A Rowe Jr a écrit : On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 18/04/2018 à 22:12, William A Rowe Jr a écrit : On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:31

Re: A proposal...

Am 23.04.2018 um 16:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: It seems that, IMO, if there was not so much concern about "regressions" in releases, this whole revisit-versioning debate would not have come up. This implies, to me at least, that the root cause (as I've said before) appears to be one related to

Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

Am 20.04.2018 um 11:39 schrieb Eric Covener: On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:15 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: Do we need a quick APR 1.6.4 to pick up r1819938? From CHANGES: *) poll, port: re-add the wakeup pipe to the pollset after it triggered. Not doing this occasi

Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

Am 20.04.2018 um 09:22 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: Do we need a quick APR 1.6.4 to pick up r1819938? From CHANGES: *) poll, port: re-add the wakeup pipe to the pollset after it triggered. Not

Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

Do we need a quick APR 1.6.4 to pick up r1819938? From CHANGES: *) poll, port: re-add the wakeup pipe to the pollset after it triggered. Not doing this occasionally lead to httpd event MPM processes hanging during process shutdown. PR 61786. [Yann Ylavic] From the commit log:

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

Am 19.04.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski: On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:26 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: With all this in mind, should we try to set things up so that the next release cycle uses the

Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)

Am 18.04.2018 um 18:07 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: Since this thread was triggered by the mod_ssl config merging problems: I think that was a case where a new feature was really nice, but to implement it the

Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)

Am 18.04.2018 um 15:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: There are, IMO at least, 3 types of "regression" that we should be concerned about or that some people are concerned about: 1. New features: Undoubtedly, new features will likely have bugs and no by adding new features we could be

Re: buildbot success in on httpd-trunk

don't know enough about how hooks work on Windows to propose a solution. Builds fine now with OpenSSL 1.1.1 pre4, tls1.3 test looks promising. Thanks. The below errors was my fault, was mixing, sorry. OK, no problem. Regards, Rainer On Monday 09/04/2018 at 19:22, Rainer Jung wrote:

Re: buildbot success in on httpd-trunk

Hi Steffen, are the below errors you reported from building trunk or from building 2.4? Your mail subject was "Re: buildbot success in on httpd-trunk" so I thought trunk but after trying for quite some time couldn't find any reason for problems there. Your second email makes me wonder

Re: svn commit: r1828670 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES CMakeLists.txt

NP, that was an easy one. Thanks for the useful feature :) I did not try to fix the missing mod_md build. I'm hoping for someone more cmake-aware to fix it ... Regards, Rainer

Re: TLSv1.3

I don't know whether it helps, but OpenSSL release pre4 (beta 2) yesterday. Regards, Rainer Am 04.04.2018 um 13:24 schrieb Stefan Eissing: Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately, my FF 58.0.2 and 59.0.2 still keeps doing TLSv1.2 while the Nightly goes TLSv1.3. Perhaps a matter of the previous

Re: TLSv1.3

Am 29.03.2018 um 16:15 schrieb Eric Covener: If you have this setup handy, could you check what happens if you negotiate TLS1.3 then request a directory that has per-directory SSL settings in it? I assume it fails (renegotiation) but not sure how the logs will look. That would be one big

Bugzilla admin rights for httpd should now be available to Christophe

Am 24.03.2018 um 15:55 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 24.03.2018 um 15:16 schrieb Eric Covener: On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Christophe Jaillet Could mod_md, mod_macro and mod_authnz_fcgi be added to the Component list, please? Done -- thanks for pointing it out and all the maintenance

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

Am 24.03.2018 um 15:16 schrieb Eric Covener: On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: Le 22/03/2018 à 11:14, Rainer Jung a écrit : Am 22.03.2018 um 08:32 schrieb Eric Covener: On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

Am 22.03.2018 um 08:32 schrieb Eric Covener: On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of pushing the

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

Am 18.03.2018 um 00:43 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.33: [X] +1: It's not just good,

Re: mod_md : not possible to use Lets-Encrypt-Win-Simple

Am 18.03.2018 um 20:07 schrieb Eric Covener: On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Steffen wrote: It is indeed a limitation for an "old" account, and when LE enables TLS again (not sure it does already in ACMEv2 protocol) When did this become about TLS-SNI challenges and

Re: [NOTICE] T of 2.4.33 imminent

Am 17.03.2018 um 20:37 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all; I will be doing the tag and roll of 2.4.33 very soon (2ish hours). I am on mobile so haven't reviewed STATUS since yesterday during the day - now would be a great time for votes and backports just before bundling it all up :-) In

Re: Poll: increase OpenSSL version requirement for trunk?

Am 16.03.2018 um 13:20 schrieb Eric Covener: On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: Last time we had the discussion was 2010/2011. We might increase minimum OpenSSL version for everything newer than 2.4.x to OpenSSL 1.0.1. I think RHEL 6 and SLES1

Re: Poll: increase OpenSSL version requirement for trunk?

Am 16.03.2018 um 13:20 schrieb Eric Covener: On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: Last time we had the discussion was 2010/2011. We might increase minimum OpenSSL version for everything newer than 2.4.x to OpenSSL 1.0.1. I think RHEL 6 and SLES1

Poll: increase OpenSSL version requirement for trunk?

Last time we had the discussion was 2010/2011. We might increase minimum OpenSSL version for everything newer than 2.4.x to OpenSSL 1.0.1. I think RHEL 6 and SLES11 both provide OpenSSL 1.0.1 at least as an alternative. RHEL 7 and SLES 12 still seems to be at 1.0.1 (at least without service

Re: mod_md OpenSSL version requirement 1.0.0

Am 16.03.2018 um 12:21 schrieb Rainer Jung: It seems mod_md (trunk and 2.4, currently identical) needs OpenSSL 1.0.2 (for ASN1_TIME_diff), but with a small change (using the already existing LIBRESSL alternative code) it only needs 1.0.0. Since we still support 0.9.8a+ for 2.4.x and trunk, I

mod_md OpenSSL version requirement 1.0.0

It seems mod_md (trunk and 2.4, currently identical) needs OpenSSL 1.0.2 (for ASN1_TIME_diff), but with a small change (using the already existing LIBRESSL alternative code) it only needs 1.0.0. Since we still support 0.9.8a+ for 2.4.x and trunk, I think we need to add a version check to

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 18:25 schrieb lucas29252: Steffen sent me the patched module and it works! Same here. Regards, Rainer

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 -0400): +1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't quickly/casually picking up source

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via ANNOUNCE. Thoughts? I

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: Index: modules/slotmem/mod_slotmem_shm.c === --- modules/slotmem/mod_slotmem_shm.c (revision 1

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: For the sake of completeness, here are the full trace8 (failed) startup logs for this reproduction scenario: Thanks Rainer! Could you (or Steffen, or Luca

Re: mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work with 2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:59 PM, lucas29252 wrote: Hi, I'm the original reporter. I've just make a fresh install of httpd-2.4.32-Win64-VC15.zip

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 14.03.2018 um 16:10 schrieb Joe Orton: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote: This looks like the failure I see when localhost resolves to both ::1 and 127.0.0.1, which happens with modern Fedora hosts: $ grep localhost /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 14.03.2018 um 19:59 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: On 2018-03-14 09:56, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: All 280 builds succeeded. Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff! +1! Rainer must be a machine... or, perhaps only partially

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 10.03.2018 um 03:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.32: [X] +1: It's not just

Re: mod_security Chrash in 2.9.2 libapr1.dll

Hi Steffen, hi list, Am 12.03.2018 um 14:07 schrieb Steffen: I think it should released with 2.4.32 (+) . Endly  solved  a pain with  all that crashes. thanks for reminding us of that problem. Since it is a logging only change for INFO log level and our default log level is WARN, plus as

Re: svn commit: r1826543 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http/http_request.c

Hi Yann, Am 12.03.2018 um 13:24 schrieb yla...@apache.org: Author: ylavic Date: Mon Mar 12 12:24:27 2018 New Revision: 1826543 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1826543=rev Log: Fix timeout logging in ap_process_request(). We can't use 'r' after ap_process_request_after_handler(), the

Re: apr trunk make test results on LFS

Am 27.02.2018 um 00:13 schrieb Alain Toussaint: Hello, I have a test log of trunk apr build with these configure settings: ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-static --enable-nonportable-atomics --enable-threads --enable- posix-shm --enable-allocator-uses-mmap --enable-allocator-guard-pages

Re: [Bug 42610] mod_rewrite and mod_proxy handle ';' incorrectly

show_bug.cgi?id=42610> Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de <mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de>> changed: --- Comment #3 from Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de <mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de>> --- Undo spam change Thanks a lot for cleaning up all t

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s not

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s not

Re: mod_ssl and SSLPolicy

Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen: As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to object to the existence of SSLPolicy and . I think it's unwise to have two directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. As long as it's still only in trunk, we

Re: Serf support in trunk

19.11.2017 um 12:49 schrieb Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: While testing the 2.5.0 alpha candidate I noticed, that our optional use of serf in mod_proxy and mpm_event is pretty outdated (so unmaintained): - the serf API we use was only present in serf until version 0.3.1 (February

MPM motorz

During testing the 2.5.0 alpha candidate I observed various problems with the motorz MPM: looping on CPU, segmentation faults and quite some test errors I do not get for the event MPM. Do others see such issues as well? Regards, Rainer

Serf support in trunk

While testing the 2.5.0 alpha candidate I noticed, that our optional use of serf in mod_proxy and mpm_event is pretty outdated (so unmaintained): - the serf API we use was only present in serf until version 0.3.1 (February 2010) - in May 2010 it was changed inside serf and httpd does not

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

Hi Steffen, Am 07.11.2017 um 10:10 schrieb Steffen: Jim wrote below: /What, exactly, are the expected differences between trunk and 2.5.0-alpha?/ I could not find the answer in this (long) thread ? as far as I understand Daniel, he will tag current trunk as 2.5.0-alpha or more likely

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

Although that list is almost 5 years old, people interested for some major differences between trunk and 2.4.x might have a look at: https://home.apache.org/~rjung/patches/possible-backports-httpd-trunk-2_4.txt especially at items 1)-7). Regards, Rainer

Re: svn commit: r1813027 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Hi Bill, Am 31.10.2017 um 21:29 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:17 AM, wrote: Author: ylavic Date: Mon Oct 23 15:17:02 2017 New Revision: 1813027 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1813027=rev Log: Update comment according to patch version (v5).

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

Am 26.10.2017 um 10:30 schrieb Yann Ylavic: I like this "attic" idea better, resurrecting something is easier if you can find that it ever existed (w/o diving into svn history, à la "svn delete"). +1

Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

Am 24.10.2017 um 23:05 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen wrote: On Tuesday 24/10/2017 at 10:26, Steffen wrote: Can someone clean up the not needed anymore

Re: buildbot failure in on httpd-trunk

Am 17.10.2017 um 02:19 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:48 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Rainer, https://ci.apache.org/builders/httpd-trunk/builds/1203 would you please re-kick this

Re: buildbot failure in on httpd-trunk

Am 16.10.2017 um 11:23 schrieb build...@apache.org: The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder httpd-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/httpd-trunk/builds/1199 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build:

Re: AC_CHECK_LIB issues under maintainer mode (Was: Re: Tagging 2.4.29 / 2.5.0-{alpha/beta?} today)

Am 16.10.2017 um 12:31 schrieb Joe Orton: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:51:54AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: The long and short is that under maintainer mode, we cannot expect AC_CHECK_LIB to being correct any longer, because the combination of -Werror and -Wstrict-prototypes means that any and all

gcc error (-Werror=pointer-compare) in trunk util_expr_eval.c

I get the following error for an old line (r1037504, but now trying maintainer-mode): .../server/util_expr_eval.c: In function 'ap_expr_eval_re_backref': .../server/util_expr_eval.c:265:63: error: comparison between pointer and zero character constant [-Werror=pointer-compare] if

Re: AC_CHECK_LIB issues under maintainer mode (Was: Re: Tagging 2.4.29 / 2.5.0-{alpha/beta?} today)

Am 15.10.2017 um 16:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: Why is this happening now? The "-Werror" was backported last December in r1772330, which was a backport of r1702948 from trunk (May 2015). Maybe peo

Re: AC_CHECK_LIB issues under maintainer mode (Was: Re: Tagging 2.4.29 / 2.5.0-{alpha/beta?} today)

Hi Jim, Am 13.10.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Let's recall what is really happening... In maintainer mode, the build system sets -Werror and -Wstrict-prototypes. This means that functions which lack strict prototypes will "fail". Now note that AC_CHECK_LIB does not worry about

Solaris prefork proxy failures (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

I observe sporadic failures in the proxy tests for 2.4.x. They only happen on Solaris (Sparc) and only for prefork MPM. Although they are not strictly reproducible, I think they only happen with APR 1.6 an with mod_http2/mod_proxy_http2 loaded (although they do not happen during their test

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

An update concerning the sporadic proxy test failures for prefork on Solaris that I observed: These are a bit difficult to nail down, because running only the proxy tests does not fail. One has to run a relatively big part of the test suite to have a chance of triggering the problem during

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

Am 25.09.2017 um 14:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. [X] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger

Re: svn commit: r1800835 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES modules/lua/README modules/lua/config.m4 modules/lua/lua_apr.c modules/lua/lua_config.c modules/lua/lua_request.c modules/lua/mod_

Am 06.07.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Jacob Champion: On 07/06/2017 07:21 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: From IRC: [10:09:37] I've personally never used apr_table like described by jchampion_ [10:09:46] and I don't believe it's documented? [10:10:15] if you want to set a header, you'd use

Re: svn commit: r1800835 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES modules/lua/README modules/lua/config.m4 modules/lua/lua_apr.c modules/lua/lua_config.c modules/lua/lua_request.c modules/lua/mod_

Hi Jacob, Am 05.07.2017 um 22:10 schrieb Jacob Champion: On 07/05/2017 12:30 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: So... do we care? If we do, here's a potential patch to *partially* return to the previous behavior: --- modules/lua/lua_apr.c +++ modules/lua/lua_apr.c @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ int

Re: perl test framework

Am 05.07.2017 um 13:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: I am curious... what versions of Perl are people using when running the Perl test framework? It seems that, at least to me, it is quite picky regarding versions, at least on macOS. Just my personal recipe: Solaris: self-compiled 5.22.0 Linux:

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

Hi Jan, Am 29.05.2017 um 10:54 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt: Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sun, 28 May 2017 23:20:35 +0200): Due to quick votes from the team this has now been committed in r1796539 for 2.4.26. Thanks. I checked woth the 2.4.x branch, built on Windows with CMake/VC14 (plus

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

Am 28.05.2017 um 16:16 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 28.05.2017 um 13:13 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt: Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:29:38 +0200): ... In addition I noticed the following glitch: ... The "-m" option is independent of SSL use and should be handl

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

Am 28.05.2017 um 13:13 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt: Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:29:38 +0200): Thanks for the analysis. So the following patch on trunk works for me when using OpenSSL 1.0.1e (on Solaris 10): Index: support/ab.c

Re: Change from ad-hoc/historical security process to ASF process?

Am 22.05.2017 um 22:38 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 3:17 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On May 5, 2017 13:32, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: +1... Lets do it. BTW, I would adjust #16 to include: Add the CVE to the CHANGES file. That way, it's

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

Thanks for the list. One remark inline ... Am 18.05.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Based on feedback from various sessions: o A new-kind of "hot standby" in mod_proxy which kicks in whenever a worker moves out of the pool (ie, doesn't wait until all workers are out)... ala a

Re: SSL and Usability and Safety

Am 02.05.2017 um 15:19 schrieb Stefan Eissing: With 71 configuration directives, mod_ssl can manage probably every user's needs, but two: Mr and Ms Normal. Ms and Mr Normal have a basic understanding about SSL, sorry TLS, and what a cipher is, but HonorCipherOrder is already a bit much and on

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

Am 20.04.2017 um 21:23 schrieb Jacob Champion: On 04/20/2017 07:31 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: ABS doesn't work with openssl 1.1.0, on windows anyway. It builds without warning yet doesn't work. abs https://www.domain.com just sits there forever and never completes or shows anything. I cannot

Re: The drive for 2.4.26

Am 20.04.2017 um 16:31 schrieb Gregg Smith: ABS doesn't work with openssl 1.1.0, on windows anyway. It builds without warning yet doesn't work. abs https://www.domain.com just sits there forever and never completes or shows anything. I cannot imagine this being a windows only problem. Any

Re: Fixing more OpenSSL callback crashes

Am 13.04.2017 um 23:40 schrieb Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO: ...oh. So errno is actually threadsafe, but its "address" is the same in every thread? Interesting. MT-Safe errno of Solaris is implemented as a function, so its address is same but the value is different. cf.

Re: Fixing more OpenSSL callback crashes

Hi Jacob, Am 12.04.2017 um 02:16 schrieb Jacob Champion: On 04/10/2017 03:59 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: So it looks like my test program might still be a possible solution for detecting whether we need a callback at configure time, unless anyone knows of a platform where two thread-local errnos

Re: Fixing more OpenSSL callback crashes

Am 10.04.2017 um 22:41 schrieb Jacob Champion: A few questions for the list while I'm brainstorming the best way to fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 ... - What is the oldest version of OpenSSL we'll support for the 2.4.x line? Will that version change in 2.next? For

Re: svn commit: r1779738 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ modules/http2/

Am 21.01.2017 um 16:07 schrieb ic...@apache.org: Author: icing Date: Sat Jan 21 15:07:42 2017 New Revision: 1779738 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779738=rev Log: On the trunk: *) mod_http2: rework of stream resource cleanup to avoid a crash in a close of a lingering connection.

Re: Welcome Lucien Gentis and Luca Tascano to the HTTP Server PMC

Am 13.01.2017 um 02:23 schrieb Eric Covener: HTTP Server committers Lucien Gentis and Luca Tascano were recently elected to the HTTP Server Project Management Committee (PMC). Welcome Lucien and Luca to the PMC! Rainer

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.2.32

Am 09.01.2017 um 19:21 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: The pre-release candidate tarballs of Apache legacy httpd 2.2.32 can be found in; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Thanks to all for patches and reviews to get us to this point. STATUS file is updated to reflect end of maintenance Jul 1 '17.

Re: svn commit: r1769669 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-merge-http-strict: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ server/

Am 22.12.2016 um 18:25 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Eric Covener > wrote: I think the log severity changes below could use some eyes, especially in context of 2.2. Are these lowered because they're redundant?

Re: svn commit: r1775186 - /httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/http_strict.t

Hi Bill, Am 20.12.2016 um 18:22 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:20 PM, > wrote: Author: rjung Date: Mon Dec 19 22:20:12 2016 New Revision: 1775186 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775186=rev

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >