[This is my first post to this list, but I've been lurking for a month or so. Hello.]
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:46:31AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > GNATS (bugs.apache.org), in short, sucks (that's an understatement). > All I want is a usable web interface to manage our bugs. I have > spent way too much time over the last few weeks fighting this > horrible bug system and trying to clean up the entries. > > So, who among those who would go through the bugs would veto the use > of bugzilla? It may be crap, but I believe less so than GNATS. Pier > already has bugzilla setup on nagoya, so it should be fairly trivial > to add an httpd-2.0 project. > > Please don't tell me that bugzilla is insecure - it's already being > used by the ASF - adding one more project isn't going to introduce > any new holes. And, it may just make it so that mere mortals can > triage the bugs that we need to address before 2.0 GA. I'd like this a lot, because at present, I have some time. I'd like to help, but I find it very difficult to see what bugs need to be fixed for 2.0 and to track if anyone else is working on them. I've used 'zilla before, and yes, it's a dreadful tool. But if it's already set up on apache.org, other folks are using it, and getting this project on it will not require much effort, I think it would be a good idea. Just so that everyone can see exactly what we need to crack, and hopefully get those last few issues resolved. Ben
